Measuring Microbial Communities' Biomass: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Direct== | ==Direct== | ||
===Agar Plates== | ===Agar Plates=== | ||
Outlined by Jones et al (1948) the use of agar plates was used to count [[organisms]] in microscopic fields [3]. [[Soil]] samples are first taken at random and sifted through a sieve and then weighed out [3]. Following this the sample is then put into a crucible with sterile distilled water and ground up with a glass rod [3]. The sample is then washed with sterile distilled water with the suspended matter poured into a flask [3]. The soil suspension is then made up to 50ml with 1.5% being agar [3]. Once this is done the flask is shaken and left to rest for a short period. Once rested using a pipette the samples are taken and put on a slide [3]. Once the slide is prepared it is then put into sterile distilled water [3]. Once dried the sample can then be put under a microscope to count organisms [3]. | Outlined by Jones et al (1948) the use of agar plates was used to count [[organisms]] in microscopic fields [3]. [[Soil]] samples are first taken at random and sifted through a sieve and then weighed out [3]. Following this the sample is then put into a crucible with sterile distilled water and ground up with a glass rod [3]. The sample is then washed with sterile distilled water with the suspended matter poured into a flask [3]. The soil suspension is then made up to 50ml with 1.5% being agar [3]. Once this is done the flask is shaken and left to rest for a short period. Once rested using a pipette the samples are taken and put on a slide [3]. Once the slide is prepared it is then put into sterile distilled water [3]. Once dried the sample can then be put under a microscope to count organisms [3]. | ||
Revision as of 18:46, 4 May 2021
To sample microbial communities’ biomass there are two approaches. The two approaches include several different methods. These approaches are either direct or indirect sampling techniques [2]. Directing sampling involved counting while indirect sampling involves the use of chemicals [2].
Direct
Agar Plates
Outlined by Jones et al (1948) the use of agar plates was used to count organisms in microscopic fields [3]. Soil samples are first taken at random and sifted through a sieve and then weighed out [3]. Following this the sample is then put into a crucible with sterile distilled water and ground up with a glass rod [3]. The sample is then washed with sterile distilled water with the suspended matter poured into a flask [3]. The soil suspension is then made up to 50ml with 1.5% being agar [3]. Once this is done the flask is shaken and left to rest for a short period. Once rested using a pipette the samples are taken and put on a slide [3]. Once the slide is prepared it is then put into sterile distilled water [3]. Once dried the sample can then be put under a microscope to count organisms [3].
Extractable DNA
Torsvik et al (1990) used the extractable DNA to determine the identities of organisms in soil samples [2]. Six 30g soil samples were first prepared. Following this samples were washed with 2% sodium hexametaphosphate to increase the yield of DNA [6]. This allows for the extraction of naked DNA adsorbs to colloids [6]. The suspensions are then stored in a refrigerator and the pellets were stored in isopropanol [6]. Pellets are then centrifuged, suspended in a buffer, and then homogenized to lyse the soil bacteria [6]. Following this the volume is adjusted to 25ml using a buffer and then incubated for one hour [6]. Then 2 mg of proteinase K ml-1 was added and then incubated for another hour [6]. The suspension is then heated to 60oC, sodium dodecyl sulfate was added, and then incubated for five minutes [6]. The lysate was then, KCl was added, refrigerated overnight, and then centrifuged [6]. The supernatants were pooled and purified on a hydroxyapatite (HAP) column [6]. DNA from the pooled fractions were then concentrated by cetylpyridinium bromide precipitation to purify the DNA [6].
Signature Lipid Biomarkers (SLB)
This technique involves the measurement of ester-linked polar lipid fatty acids and steroids to find microbial biomass and community structure [2]. A common biomarker used for this technique are phospholipids fatty acids (PFLAs) [2]. The total number of PFLAs provides quantitative measure of viable or potentially viable biomass []. When a cell dies the cellular enzymes hydrolyze and release a phosphate group. The remaining lipid is then compared to the ratio of PFLAs to the remaining lipid []. This provides evidence of viable and non-viable microbes [].