Soil Particle Size Analysis Methods: Difference between revisions

From Soil Ecology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).)
m (The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Soil Particle Size Analysis Methods==
There are three basic classifications of [[soil]] particle size: [[clay]], [[silt]] and [[sand]], from smallest to largest, respectively. These three basic classifications are subdivided into more groups due to the large range, and are often called soil separates. There are several different methods to determining how much clay, silt and sand is in a sample of soil. Methods may be mechanical, chemical, or both with many different innovations on these methods to fit unique situations being utilized by researchers.
Please redirect to the [[Loss on Ignition]] test, for a method which determines the amount of [[Organic Matter|organic matter]] in the soil.


[[File:sieve.jpg|left|thumb|caption|US Standard Sieve]]
==Basic Analysis==
Soil has three basic classifications, but there are further definitions within those classifications to clarify analysis. These can vary a small amount across soil classification systems, but for the purposes of soil [[ecology]], the utilization of the USDA classification is a standardized classification, as well as the World Reference Base (WRB), an international standard for soil classification system endorsed by the International Union of Soil Sciences.  The USDA classification is based off the grade scale from Wentworth (1922).<ref name="USGS">[https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1195/htmldocs/nomenclature.htm "USGS Open-File Report 2006-1195: Nomenclature"], ''USGS'', 05/01/2020. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref>


There are three basic classifications of [[soil]] particle size. They include [[clay]], [[silt]] and [[sand]], from smallest to largest, respectively. There are several different methods to determining how much clay, silt and sand is in a sample of soil, two include sieving, and another which uses a hydrometer. There is another method used in determining the amount of organic mater in soil, to do this one might use the [[Loss on Ignition]] test, however the purpose of this article will be to focus on clay, silt and sand only. 
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Soil particle names
! Diameter Ranges (mm)
USDA classification


===Sieving===
! Diameter Ranges (mm)
WRB classification


To begin, the soil sample needs to be dried to a constant weight, for 24 hrs at 120˚F this will eliminate all the moisture held in the soil.
|-
Once the soil is dried to constant weight, the sieving can begin. The sieves come with different size screens and they should be chosen according to the particles that are to be isolated.
| Clay
[[File:sievestack.jpeg|right|thumb|caption|Stacked Sieve: largest screen size at the top, smallest screen sieve at the bottom]]
| less than 0.002
There should be one sieve on top with larger holes to accommodate for gravel that is in the soil. Gravel includes any particle larger than 2mm and will be considered as "sand". [1]
| less than 0.002
|-
| Silt
| 0.002 - 0.05
| 0.002 - 0.063
|-
| Very fine sand
| 0.05 - 0.10
| 0.063 - 0.125
|-
| Fine sand
| 0.10 - 0.25
| 0.125 - 0.20
|-
| Medium sand
| 0.25 - 0.50
| 0.20 - 0.63
|-
| Coarse sand
| 0.50 - 1.00
| 0.63 - 1.25
|-
| Very coarse sand  
| 1.00 - 2.00
| 1.25 - 2.00
|}


Course sand particles range from 1.0 - 2.0 mm while very fine sand particles range from 0.05 - 0.10mm.[1] Choosing two or more sieves within that range might be helpful to account for larger or smaller sand particles; for instance, include a sieve at 2.0mm and one at 0.05mm.
There is also soil material classification which is based off the percentage of clay, silt, and sand within the sampled material, which can vary across soil classification systems. For the purposes of [[Soil Ecology|soil ecology]], soil classifications are defined by the USDA.
Silt particles ranges from 0.05mm - 0.002 mm [1], therefore a sieve with a corresponding screen hole size of 0.002 mm should suffice.


Lastly, clay particles are anything smaller than 0.002mm. [1] At the bottom of the stack of sieves should be placed a bottom container with a solid bottom to collect the clay particle that will sift past the 0.002mm sieve. 
''See also:'' [[Soil Textures]]


Once the sieves are set up, the soil sample that has been dried to a constant weight will be sifted through the sieves using a sieve shaker. After about 15-20 min of shaking the soil should be separated into gravel, sand, silt and clay. The proportions can then be calculated to determine how much of each particle is one soil sample. For instance, 26g sand/50g total soil = 52% sand.
==Methods==
[[File:sieve.jpg|left|thumb|caption|US Standard Sieve]]
===Sieving===
There are different methods of sieving, such as dry or wet sieving, with different innovations on the basic process.<ref name="Diaz">Dı́az-Zorita, M., E. Perfect, and J. H. Grove, "Disruptive methods for assessing soil structure", ''Soil and Tillage Research 64:3–22'', 2002. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref>


Soil sieving is a purely mechanical process of determining soil particle size in a sample of soil. [2] A better method to accurately separating clay particles from the soil would be to use a hydrometer.


===Hydrometer===
For dry, flat sieving, the soil must be dried to a constant weight before the sample is actually put through any sieves. All moisture held in the soil should be eliminated either by exposing the sample to 120˚F for at least 24 hours or air drying.<ref name="Diaz" />  Once this is accomplished, the sample is put through a series of sieves, which should be arranged with a larger size mesh on top to the smaller size mesh on the bottom. The size of these screens is dependent on which particles are to be isolated for the experiment.


[[Clay]] particles are made up of either three or four charged ions, because of this they tend to cling to one another [3], this tendency is called flocculation[4].  This can sometimes pose a problem when trying to accurately determine the proportion of clay particles in a sample of soil. When measuring soil samples using a hydrometer, sodium hexametaphospahte is added to the water, this acts as a defloccuant, meaning the clay particle ions will now repulse each other instead of clinging to one another. [4,5] This will result in a more accurate reading of sand, silt, and clay particles than could be achieved by sieving alone.
[[File:sievestack.jpeg|right|thumb|caption|Stacked Sieve: largest screen size at the top, smallest screen sieve at the bottom]]
[[File:hydrometer.jpg|right|thumb]]
To measure using a hydrometer, a solution of water mixed with sodium hexametaphosphate is prepared and poured into a 1000ml graudated cylinder. The solution must be at room temperature for accurate readings[6].


The soil sample (for example 50g soil) is then poured into the solution and shaken or stirred until evenly distributed. Historically, the use of a milk shake, or malt machine was recommended to shake the solution! This was to ensure even distribution of the soil throughout the water solution.[7]
There are U.S.A. standard size sieves which are often utilized for this process.


The hydrometer is then placed in the graduated cylinder, and a measurement is read off of it after 40 seconds.  
The sieve with the larger holes will screen out any larger particles present in the soil; this could include [[gravel]], defined as a particle larger than 2mm in diameter. The subsequent sieves will act in the same way for progressively smaller soil particles. For example, silt particles ranges from 0.05mm - 0.002 mm,<ref name="USGS">[https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1195/htmldocs/nomenclature.htm "USGS Open-File Report 2006-1195: Nomenclature"], ''USGS'', 05/01/2020. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref> therefore a sieve with a corresponding screen hole size of 0.002 mm would be necessary to filter for silt particles.


The hydrometer is then taken out and the solution of soil, water, and sodium hexmetaphosphate it stirred or shaken again.
Once the stack of sieves have been set up, the dry soil sample can be sifted. Sieves can be shaken mechanically or manually; this can be done horizontally, vertically, or both.<ref name="Diaz">Dı́az-Zorita, M., E. Perfect, and J. H. Grove, "Disruptive methods for assessing soil structure", ''Soil and Tillage Research 64:3–22'', 2002. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref> There is also no standard time for shaking flat sieves, the duration being dependent on the type of soil and the determined point of stopping the shaking which differs among researchers.<ref name="Diaz">Dı́az-Zorita, M., E. Perfect, and J. H. Grove, "Disruptive methods for assessing soil structure", ''Soil and Tillage Research 64:3–22'', 2002. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref> Regardless, by the end of the sieving, the sample should be roughly separated into gravel, sand, silt and clay. The proportions of different particle amounts to the entire soil sample can then be calculated with basic division. A simple example is, 26g sand/50g total soil = 52% sand.
Dry flat soil sieving is a purely mechanical process to determine soil particle size in a sample of soil, lacking a clear standardization of method and so likely to have some level of error in measurements.<ref name="Diaz">Dı́az-Zorita, M., E. Perfect, and J. H. Grove, "Disruptive methods for assessing soil structure", ''Soil and Tillage Research 64:3–22'', 2002. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref> It is also not effective for all types of soil all the time, especially for [[clay]] particles. This is because [[clay]] particles are made up of either three or four charged ions, which leads these charged particles to cling together.<ref>Coleman, D. C., and D. A. Crossley, "Fundamentals of [[Soil Ecology|soil ecology]]. Third edition.", ''Elsevier/Academic Press, London ; San Diego, CA.'', 2018. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref> This tendency is called flocculation, defined as the aggregation or clumping together of smaller particles to form larger particles due to different physical, chemical, and biological interactions.<ref>Liss, S. N., I. G. Droppo, G. G. Leppard, and T. G. Milligan, editors, "Flocculation in Natural and Engineered Environmental Systems.", ''CRC Press'', 2004. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref>


Another 40 second reading will be taken and then an average of the two readings will be calculated to determine the amount of sand (and gravel) in the sample.  
===Hydrometer===
 
Using a hydrometer is a second method to determine the proportion of different particles in a soil sample, orginally developed in 1927.<ref>Bouyoucos G, "A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils", ''American Society of Agronomy'', 2951. 3/29/2022.</ref> To address the issue of the ionic bonds between clay particles, sodium hexametaphosphate is added to the water as a deflocculant. The sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent, interacting with the charged particles on clay particles to prevent the clay particles from coming together into a clump.<ref name="Andreola">Andreola, F., E. Castellini, T. Manfredini, and M. Romagnoli, "The role of sodium hexametaphosphate in the dissolution process of kaolinite and kaolin", ''Journal of the European Ceramic Society 24:2113–2124.'', 2004. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref>
To obtain an accurate reading of clay and silt percentages the solution should sit for 6.5-8 hours at least, 12 at the most[6], however if 100% accuracy isn't need, an hour will suffice.  
To use the hydrometer method, a solution of water mixed with sodium hexametaphosphate is prepared.<ref name="Dir Bour">Bouyoucos, George, "Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method", ''Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230'', 1936e. Retrieved 3/29/2022. </ref> The accuracy of particle percentages is dependent on a constant temperature, adequate particle dispersal, and correct timing of the density observations.<ref name="Carolyn">Carolyn, C. B., and G. Karl, "Comparison of Hydrometer Settling Times in Soil Particle Size Analysis",  ''Journal of Range Management 42:81-83'', 1989. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref> Once the solution is prepared, it must be placed into an orbital shaker overnight.<ref name="Dir Bour">Bouyoucos, George, "Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method", ''Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230'', 1936e. Retrieved 3/29/2022. </ref> If it is not placed into an orbital shaker, it should be shaken with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, the stone removed, and placed in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution must then be transferred to 1000 milliliters or 1 liter graduated cylinder, where water is added to fill the graduated cylinders totally.<ref name="Dir Bour">Bouyoucos, George, "Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method", ''Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230'', 1936e. Retrieved 3/29/2022. </ref> The particles should separate based on their size and sink, with the largest flaling to the bottom and the smallest particles remaining higher. The soil hydrometer is then used to measure the relative density of the solution. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution as a baseline. For accurate measurements, the hydrometer should be placed into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at different time frames.  The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded.<ref name="Bouy recalibration"> Bouyoucos G, ["A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils"], ''American Society of Agronomy'', 1951. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref>


The solution, with the hydrometer in it still, will then sit for at least 1-8 hours depending on the accuracy desiredDuring this time the silt will settle to the bottom on the cylinder and the clay particles will remain suspended in the water[6], this suspension will allow the hydrometer to stay suspended as well and the water line will correlate to a reading which will allow the reader to determine the amount of clay in the sample. The remaining part of the proportion of sand + clay subtracted from the total soil sample will determine the amount of silt in the sample.
For sand percent composition, the hydrometer should be put in and measurement should be read between 30 to 60 seconds, with general recommendations to mark the measurement at 40-45 seconds.<ref name="Carolyn">Carolyn, C. B., and G. Karl, "Comparison of Hydrometer Settling Times in Soil Particle Size Analysis", ''Journal of Range Management 42:81-83'', 1989. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref> Once this has been recorded, the hydrometer should be removed, and the solution is to be stirred or shaken again. For further accuracy, the hydrometer can be put in again and the measurement can be recorded at 40 seconds again to take the average of the two readings of the sample.<ref name="Carolyn">Carolyn, C. B., and G. Karl, "Comparison of Hydrometer Settling Times in Soil Particle Size Analysis",  ''Journal of Range Management 42:81-83'', 1989. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref>


==Conclusion==
For silt percentage composition, the hydrometer should be read between 1 to 1.5 hours.


In conclusion, performing both experiments is a good way to compare and contrast results. The gravel/sand, and silt proportions should resemble one another between the two tests, however a more accurate proportion of clay particle may be obtained from a hydrometer reading.  
For clay percentage composition, the hydrometer should be read between 6 to 24 hours, though there is variation depending on the time that the hydrometer is read.<ref name="Carolyn">Carolyn, C. B., and G. Karl, "Comparison of Hydrometer Settling Times in Soil Particle Size Analysis", ''Journal of Range Management 42:81-83'', 1989. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref>


===References===
With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows:<ref name="Bouy recalibration"> Bouyoucos G, ["A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils"], ''American Society of Agronomy'', 1951. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref>
1. Whiting, David, et al. Estimating Soil Texture. 2003, Estimating Soil Texture, culter.colorado.edu/~kittel/SoilChar(&RibbonTest)_handout.pdf.


2. “Particle Size Analysis (for Soils/Sediments).” UCL Department of Geography, www.geog.ucl.ac.uk/resources/laboratory/laboratory-
%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100
methods/particle-size-analysis/particle-size-analysis-for-soils-sediments.


3. “1.8 Clay Mineral Structure.” Fundamentals of Soil [[Ecology]], by David C. Coleman et al., Academic Press, 2018.
%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100


4. Tozzi, Nilo. “Deflocculants: A Detailed Overview.” Deflocculants: A Detailed Overview, digitalfire.com/4sight/education/deflocculants_a_detailed_overview_324.html.
%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)


5. Andreola, Fernanda, et al. “The Role of Sodium Hexametaphosphate in the Dissolution Process of Kaolinite and Kaolin.” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Elsevier, 24 Sept. 2003, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955221903003662.
The sand and silt proportions may be similar between the dry flat sieving and hydrometer tests, however a more accurate proportion of clay particle may be obtained from a hydrometer reading due to the nature of the sodium hexametaphosphate acting as a deflocculant.<ref name="Andreola">Andreola, F., E. Castellini, T. Manfredini, and M. Romagnoli, "The role of sodium hexametaphosphate in the dissolution process of kaolinite and kaolin", ''Journal of the European Ceramic Society 24:2113–2124.'', 2004. Retrieved 3/29/2022.</ref>


6. Carolyn, C. B., and G. Karl. 1989. Comparison of Hydrometer Settling Times in Soil Particle Size Analysis. Journal of Range Management 42:81-83.


7. Bouyoucos, G. J. 1927. Directions for Determining the Colloidal Material of Soils by the Hydrometer Method. Science 66:16-17.
==References==
<references />

Latest revision as of 13:30, 31 March 2023

There are three basic classifications of soil particle size: clay, silt and sand, from smallest to largest, respectively. These three basic classifications are subdivided into more groups due to the large range, and are often called soil separates. There are several different methods to determining how much clay, silt and sand is in a sample of soil. Methods may be mechanical, chemical, or both with many different innovations on these methods to fit unique situations being utilized by researchers. Please redirect to the Loss on Ignition test, for a method which determines the amount of organic matter in the soil.

Basic Analysis

Soil has three basic classifications, but there are further definitions within those classifications to clarify analysis. These can vary a small amount across soil classification systems, but for the purposes of soil ecology, the utilization of the USDA classification is a standardized classification, as well as the World Reference Base (WRB), an international standard for soil classification system endorsed by the International Union of Soil Sciences. The USDA classification is based off the grade scale from Wentworth (1922).[1]

Soil particle names Diameter Ranges (mm)

USDA classification

Diameter Ranges (mm)

WRB classification

Clay less than 0.002 less than 0.002
Silt 0.002 - 0.05 0.002 - 0.063
Very fine sand 0.05 - 0.10 0.063 - 0.125
Fine sand 0.10 - 0.25 0.125 - 0.20
Medium sand 0.25 - 0.50 0.20 - 0.63
Coarse sand 0.50 - 1.00 0.63 - 1.25
Very coarse sand 1.00 - 2.00 1.25 - 2.00

There is also soil material classification which is based off the percentage of clay, silt, and sand within the sampled material, which can vary across soil classification systems. For the purposes of soil ecology, soil classifications are defined by the USDA.

See also: Soil Textures

Methods

US Standard Sieve

Sieving

There are different methods of sieving, such as dry or wet sieving, with different innovations on the basic process.[2]


For dry, flat sieving, the soil must be dried to a constant weight before the sample is actually put through any sieves. All moisture held in the soil should be eliminated either by exposing the sample to 120˚F for at least 24 hours or air drying.[2] Once this is accomplished, the sample is put through a series of sieves, which should be arranged with a larger size mesh on top to the smaller size mesh on the bottom. The size of these screens is dependent on which particles are to be isolated for the experiment.

Stacked Sieve: largest screen size at the top, smallest screen sieve at the bottom

There are U.S.A. standard size sieves which are often utilized for this process.

The sieve with the larger holes will screen out any larger particles present in the soil; this could include gravel, defined as a particle larger than 2mm in diameter. The subsequent sieves will act in the same way for progressively smaller soil particles. For example, silt particles ranges from 0.05mm - 0.002 mm,[1] therefore a sieve with a corresponding screen hole size of 0.002 mm would be necessary to filter for silt particles.

Once the stack of sieves have been set up, the dry soil sample can be sifted. Sieves can be shaken mechanically or manually; this can be done horizontally, vertically, or both.[2] There is also no standard time for shaking flat sieves, the duration being dependent on the type of soil and the determined point of stopping the shaking which differs among researchers.[2] Regardless, by the end of the sieving, the sample should be roughly separated into gravel, sand, silt and clay. The proportions of different particle amounts to the entire soil sample can then be calculated with basic division. A simple example is, 26g sand/50g total soil = 52% sand. Dry flat soil sieving is a purely mechanical process to determine soil particle size in a sample of soil, lacking a clear standardization of method and so likely to have some level of error in measurements.[2] It is also not effective for all types of soil all the time, especially for clay particles. This is because clay particles are made up of either three or four charged ions, which leads these charged particles to cling together.[3] This tendency is called flocculation, defined as the aggregation or clumping together of smaller particles to form larger particles due to different physical, chemical, and biological interactions.[4]

Hydrometer

Using a hydrometer is a second method to determine the proportion of different particles in a soil sample, orginally developed in 1927.[5] To address the issue of the ionic bonds between clay particles, sodium hexametaphosphate is added to the water as a deflocculant. The sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent, interacting with the charged particles on clay particles to prevent the clay particles from coming together into a clump.[6]

To use the hydrometer method, a solution of water mixed with sodium hexametaphosphate is prepared.[7] The accuracy of particle percentages is dependent on a constant temperature, adequate particle dispersal, and correct timing of the density observations.[8] Once the solution is prepared, it must be placed into an orbital shaker overnight.[7] If it is not placed into an orbital shaker, it should be shaken with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, the stone removed, and placed in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution must then be transferred to 1000 milliliters or 1 liter graduated cylinder, where water is added to fill the graduated cylinders totally.[7] The particles should separate based on their size and sink, with the largest flaling to the bottom and the smallest particles remaining higher. The soil hydrometer is then used to measure the relative density of the solution. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution as a baseline. For accurate measurements, the hydrometer should be placed into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at different time frames. The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded.[9]

For sand percent composition, the hydrometer should be put in and measurement should be read between 30 to 60 seconds, with general recommendations to mark the measurement at 40-45 seconds.[8] Once this has been recorded, the hydrometer should be removed, and the solution is to be stirred or shaken again. For further accuracy, the hydrometer can be put in again and the measurement can be recorded at 40 seconds again to take the average of the two readings of the sample.[8]

For silt percentage composition, the hydrometer should be read between 1 to 1.5 hours.

For clay percentage composition, the hydrometer should be read between 6 to 24 hours, though there is variation depending on the time that the hydrometer is read.[8]

With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows:[9]

%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100

%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100

%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)

The sand and silt proportions may be similar between the dry flat sieving and hydrometer tests, however a more accurate proportion of clay particle may be obtained from a hydrometer reading due to the nature of the sodium hexametaphosphate acting as a deflocculant.[6]


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 "USGS Open-File Report 2006-1195: Nomenclature", USGS, 05/01/2020. Retrieved 3/29/2022.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Dı́az-Zorita, M., E. Perfect, and J. H. Grove, "Disruptive methods for assessing soil structure", Soil and Tillage Research 64:3–22, 2002. Retrieved 3/29/2022.
  3. Coleman, D. C., and D. A. Crossley, "Fundamentals of soil ecology. Third edition.", Elsevier/Academic Press, London ; San Diego, CA., 2018. Retrieved 3/29/2022.
  4. Liss, S. N., I. G. Droppo, G. G. Leppard, and T. G. Milligan, editors, "Flocculation in Natural and Engineered Environmental Systems.", CRC Press, 2004. Retrieved 3/29/2022.
  5. Bouyoucos G, "A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils", American Society of Agronomy, 2951. 3/29/2022.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Andreola, F., E. Castellini, T. Manfredini, and M. Romagnoli, "The role of sodium hexametaphosphate in the dissolution process of kaolinite and kaolin", Journal of the European Ceramic Society 24:2113–2124., 2004. Retrieved 3/29/2022.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Bouyoucos, George, "Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method", Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230, 1936e. Retrieved 3/29/2022.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Carolyn, C. B., and G. Karl, "Comparison of Hydrometer Settling Times in Soil Particle Size Analysis", Journal of Range Management 42:81-83, 1989. Retrieved 3/29/2022.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Bouyoucos G, ["A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils"], American Society of Agronomy, 1951. Retrieved 3/29/2022.