Microplastics: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).) |
||
(24 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Overview== | |||
Most commonly studied for the detrimental effects caused in marine environments, the impact of '''Microplastics''' on [[soil]] ecosystems have been largely neglected. The main sources of microplastic pollution in soil is thought to be plastic mulching film and fertilizer produced through waste water irrigation [1]. "Microplastics are widely defined as synthetic polymers with an upper size limit of 5mm and without specified lower limit" [10]. | |||
[[File:Microplasticsfoundinsoil.jpg|center|thumb|450px| A microscopic look at plastic microfibers found in soil.]] | |||
===Primary Microplastics=== | |||
Primary microplastics are originally manufactured to be smaller than 5mm, and are typically found in the following [10]: | |||
*Textiles | |||
*Medicines | |||
*Personal care products | |||
These may be transported through rivers, water-treatment plants, and wind or surface run-off [10]. | |||
== | ===Secondary Microplastics=== | ||
Secondary microplastics are typically derived from the fragmentation or degradation of larger plastic debris through a few processes including photo-degradation, physical, chemical and biological interactions [10]. The majority of microplastics are categorized as secondary microplastics, and can originate from both land and ocean based sources including the following: [10] | |||
*Fishing nets | |||
*Industrial resin pellets | |||
*Household items | |||
*Other discarded plastic debris | |||
Estimates have concluded that ocean based sources contribute approximately 20% of total plastic debris in the marine environment, whereas terrestrial based sources contribute the remaining 80% [10]. | |||
==Plastic Mulching== | ==Plastic Mulching== | ||
[[File:20110829-FSA-XX-0028 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg|thumb|Plastic mulching in agriculture]] | [[File:20110829-FSA-XX-0028 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg|120px|left|thumb|Plastic mulching in agriculture]] | ||
Plastic mulch is used to conserve water and subdue weed growth in agriculture. Conventional plastic polymers are typically used as biodegradable alternatives are usually much more expensive [3]. Plastic polymers tend to accumulate in soil as it is broken down due to lack of economical and legal incentive surrounding removal of plastic mulching [1]. | Plastic mulch is used to conserve water and subdue weed growth in [[agriculture]]. Conventional plastic polymers are typically used as biodegradable alternatives are usually much more expensive [3]. Plastic polymers tend to accumulate in soil as it is broken down due to lack of economical and legal incentive surrounding removal of plastic mulching [1]. | ||
==Buildup of Microplastics Due to Fertilizer Application== | ==Buildup of Microplastics Due to Fertilizer Application== | ||
[[File:Shovel excavator loading the sewage sludge (6305610332).jpg|thumb|Shovel excavator loading sewage sludge fertilizer onto farmland.]] | |||
Wastewater facilities receive a large amount of microplastic fibers emitted from industry, surface run-off, and households in urban areas. A surprisingly large amount may come through use of washer machines [4]. Most of these fibers accumulate in sewage sludge, which is often turned into a fertilizer. While there are regulatory methods on the possible pollutants in waste water sludge, there remains none regarding the accumulation of microplastics. Microplastics are able to accumulate in soil through the repeat application of this sewage sludge fertilizer[2]. | Wastewater facilities receive a large amount of microplastic fibers emitted from industry, surface run-off, and households in urban areas. A surprisingly large amount may come through use of washer machines [4]. Most of these fibers accumulate in sewage sludge, which is often turned into a fertilizer. While there are regulatory methods on the possible pollutants in waste water sludge, there remains none regarding the accumulation of microplastics. Microplastics are able to accumulate in soil through the repeat application of this sewage sludge fertilizer[2]. | ||
Line 15: | Line 34: | ||
==Potential Impacts on Plant and Soil Health== | ==Potential Impacts on Plant and Soil Health== | ||
The vast potential consequences of microplastics on soil and plant ecology in generally unknown [2]. In a study conducted over five weeks, soil was exposed to a concentration of up to 2% of micro-fibrous plastics. Bulk density, water holding capacity, hydraulic conductivity, soil aggregation, and microbial activity were all measured. It was concluded that microplastics effected the bulk density of soil, water holding capacity, and the relationship between microbes and soil. The study suggests that microplastics could potentially be interfering with [[Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi]], a crucial symbiotic relationship many plants rely on. In another study, it was found that microplastics actually inhibit the movement of [[ | [[File:Isotoma Habitus.jpg|left|200px|thumb|A [[springtail]], whose movement and ability to escape predations may be debilitated due to microplastic interference with the furcula appendage.]] | ||
The vast potential consequences of microplastics on soil and plant [[ecology]] in generally unknown [2]. In a study conducted over five weeks, soil was exposed to a concentration of up to 2% of micro-fibrous plastics. Bulk density, water holding capacity, hydraulic conductivity, soil aggregation, and microbial activity were all measured. It was concluded that microplastics effected the bulk density of soil, water holding capacity, and the relationship between microbes and soil. The study suggests that microplastics could potentially be interfering with [[Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi]], a crucial symbiotic relationship many plants rely on. In another study, it was found that microplastics actually inhibit the movement of [[springtail]], an organism that plays a part in [[Soil Ecology|soil ecology]] [8]. There is a clear and surprising knowledge gap on the effects on microplastics on soils and more research is needed in order get a better understanding of the problem and the solutions to fix it [1]. | |||
==Potential Impacts on Human Health== | |||
"Microplastics are considered an emerging environmental contaminant, and so there is a dearth of convincing evidence on adverse human health effects" [9]. Evidence through research involving mathematic modeling, animal studies, and in vitro testing suggests that microplastics pose the following health risks [9]: | |||
*Oxidative stress and cytotoxicity | |||
*Altering metabolism and energy balance | |||
*Disruption of immune function | |||
*Translocation to distant tissues | |||
*Neurotoxicity | |||
*Reproductive toxicity | |||
*Carcinogenicity | |||
It is hypothesized that the adverse effects of microplastics on humans largely depends on the degree of exposure and the susceptibility of the individual [9]. | |||
===Routes of Exposure=== | |||
Direct routes of microplastic exposure include ingestion of contaminated food and water, inhalation, and through skin (dermal) contact of of microplastics found in a number of personal care products, textiles, or indoor dust [9]. | |||
Of these routes, the most common tends to be ingestion of microplastics through contaminated food and water sources. Microplastic ingestion based on American diet and lifestyle patterns was estimated to be between 39,000 and 52,000 particles per individual, and when combined with the inhalation route of exposure, these estimates increased to 74,000 to 121,000 particles per individual [9]. | |||
==Refrences== | ==Refrences== | ||
Line 28: | Line 77: | ||
[5] Rodríguez-Seijo, Andrés & Pereira, Ruth. (2019). Chapter 3. Microplastics in Agricultural Soils: Are They a Real Environmental Hazard?. 10.1201/9781315205137. | [5] Rodríguez-Seijo, Andrés & Pereira, Ruth. (2019). Chapter 3. Microplastics in Agricultural Soils: Are They a Real Environmental Hazard?. 10.1201/9781315205137. | ||
[6] Luís Carlos de Sá, Miguel Oliveira, Francisca Ribeiro, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Martyn Norman Futter.(2018).studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future?.Science of The Total Environment.Volume.645.1029-1039.0048-9697.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.207 | [6] Luís Carlos de Sá, Miguel Oliveira, Francisca Ribeiro, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Martyn Norman Futter.(2018).studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic [[organisms]]: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future?.Science of The Total Environment.Volume.645.1029-1039.0048-9697.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.207 | ||
[7] Anderson Abel de Souza Machado, Chung Wai Lau, Jennifer Till, Werner Kloas, Anika Lehmann, Roland Becker, and Matthias C. Rillig | [7] Anderson Abel de Souza Machado, Chung Wai Lau, Jennifer Till, Werner Kloas, Anika Lehmann, Roland Becker, and Matthias C. Rillig | ||
Line 34: | Line 83: | ||
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02212 | DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02212 | ||
[8]Kim, S. W., and Y.-J. An. 2019. Soil microplastics inhibit the movement of springtail species. Environment International 126:699–706. | [8] Kim, S. W., and Y.-J. An. 2019. Soil microplastics inhibit the movement of springtail species. Environment International 126:699–706. | ||
[9] Rahman, Arifur, et al. “Potential Human Health Risks Due to Environmental Exposure to Nano- and Microplastics and Knowledge Gaps: A Scoping Review.” The Science of the Total Environment, vol. 757, Elsevier B.V, 2021, pp. 143872–143872, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143872. | |||
[10] Li, Jingyi, et al. “Microplastics in Freshwater Systems: A Review on Occurrence, Environmental Effects, and Methods for Microplastics Detection.” Water Research (Oxford), vol. 137, Elsevier Ltd, 2018, pp. 362–74, doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.056. |
Latest revision as of 13:07, 10 May 2023
Overview
Most commonly studied for the detrimental effects caused in marine environments, the impact of Microplastics on soil ecosystems have been largely neglected. The main sources of microplastic pollution in soil is thought to be plastic mulching film and fertilizer produced through waste water irrigation [1]. "Microplastics are widely defined as synthetic polymers with an upper size limit of 5mm and without specified lower limit" [10].
Primary Microplastics
Primary microplastics are originally manufactured to be smaller than 5mm, and are typically found in the following [10]:
- Textiles
- Medicines
- Personal care products
These may be transported through rivers, water-treatment plants, and wind or surface run-off [10].
Secondary Microplastics
Secondary microplastics are typically derived from the fragmentation or degradation of larger plastic debris through a few processes including photo-degradation, physical, chemical and biological interactions [10]. The majority of microplastics are categorized as secondary microplastics, and can originate from both land and ocean based sources including the following: [10]
- Fishing nets
- Industrial resin pellets
- Household items
- Other discarded plastic debris
Estimates have concluded that ocean based sources contribute approximately 20% of total plastic debris in the marine environment, whereas terrestrial based sources contribute the remaining 80% [10].
Plastic Mulching
Plastic mulch is used to conserve water and subdue weed growth in agriculture. Conventional plastic polymers are typically used as biodegradable alternatives are usually much more expensive [3]. Plastic polymers tend to accumulate in soil as it is broken down due to lack of economical and legal incentive surrounding removal of plastic mulching [1].
Buildup of Microplastics Due to Fertilizer Application
Wastewater facilities receive a large amount of microplastic fibers emitted from industry, surface run-off, and households in urban areas. A surprisingly large amount may come through use of washer machines [4]. Most of these fibers accumulate in sewage sludge, which is often turned into a fertilizer. While there are regulatory methods on the possible pollutants in waste water sludge, there remains none regarding the accumulation of microplastics. Microplastics are able to accumulate in soil through the repeat application of this sewage sludge fertilizer[2].
Unknown Consequences
Studies done in Norway suggest a large portion of microplastics generated in western societies end up in the sludge found at wastewater treatment facilities [1]. In America and Europe, it is estimated that about half of total sewage sludge accumulated each year is used as fertilizer. Estimates range anywhere from 110,000 tons and 730,000 tons of microplastics being transferred to American and European soil each year [5]. There is an estimated total of 93,000 to 236,000 metric tons of microplastic entering the ocean each year [6], making soil potentially a larger reservoir than the ocean for microplastics.
Potential Impacts on Plant and Soil Health
The vast potential consequences of microplastics on soil and plant ecology in generally unknown [2]. In a study conducted over five weeks, soil was exposed to a concentration of up to 2% of micro-fibrous plastics. Bulk density, water holding capacity, hydraulic conductivity, soil aggregation, and microbial activity were all measured. It was concluded that microplastics effected the bulk density of soil, water holding capacity, and the relationship between microbes and soil. The study suggests that microplastics could potentially be interfering with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, a crucial symbiotic relationship many plants rely on. In another study, it was found that microplastics actually inhibit the movement of springtail, an organism that plays a part in soil ecology [8]. There is a clear and surprising knowledge gap on the effects on microplastics on soils and more research is needed in order get a better understanding of the problem and the solutions to fix it [1].
Potential Impacts on Human Health
"Microplastics are considered an emerging environmental contaminant, and so there is a dearth of convincing evidence on adverse human health effects" [9]. Evidence through research involving mathematic modeling, animal studies, and in vitro testing suggests that microplastics pose the following health risks [9]:
- Oxidative stress and cytotoxicity
- Altering metabolism and energy balance
- Disruption of immune function
- Translocation to distant tissues
- Neurotoxicity
- Reproductive toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
It is hypothesized that the adverse effects of microplastics on humans largely depends on the degree of exposure and the susceptibility of the individual [9].
Routes of Exposure
Direct routes of microplastic exposure include ingestion of contaminated food and water, inhalation, and through skin (dermal) contact of of microplastics found in a number of personal care products, textiles, or indoor dust [9].
Of these routes, the most common tends to be ingestion of microplastics through contaminated food and water sources. Microplastic ingestion based on American diet and lifestyle patterns was estimated to be between 39,000 and 52,000 particles per individual, and when combined with the inhalation route of exposure, these estimates increased to 74,000 to 121,000 particles per individual [9].
Refrences
[1] Lei.(2018).Microplastics in soils: Analytical methods, pollution characteristics and ecological risks.TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.163-172.0165-9936.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.006.
[2] Rillig,M.C.(2012).Microplastic in Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Soil?.Environ.Sci.Technol. 46 (12), 6453– 6454, DOI: 10.1021/es302011r
[3] Nizzetto et al (2016): “A theoretical assessment of microplastic transport in river catchments and their retention by soils and river sediments” in Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2016, 18, 1050-1059. DOI: 10.1039/C6EM00206D
[4] Nizzetto, Futter, Langaas (2016): “Are Agricultural Soils Dumps for Microplastics of Urban Origin?“ in Environ. Sci. Technol. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04140
[5] Rodríguez-Seijo, Andrés & Pereira, Ruth. (2019). Chapter 3. Microplastics in Agricultural Soils: Are They a Real Environmental Hazard?. 10.1201/9781315205137.
[6] Luís Carlos de Sá, Miguel Oliveira, Francisca Ribeiro, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Martyn Norman Futter.(2018).studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future?.Science of The Total Environment.Volume.645.1029-1039.0048-9697.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.207
[7] Anderson Abel de Souza Machado, Chung Wai Lau, Jennifer Till, Werner Kloas, Anika Lehmann, Roland Becker, and Matthias C. Rillig Environmental Science & Technology 2018 52 (17), 9656-9665 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02212
[8] Kim, S. W., and Y.-J. An. 2019. Soil microplastics inhibit the movement of springtail species. Environment International 126:699–706.
[9] Rahman, Arifur, et al. “Potential Human Health Risks Due to Environmental Exposure to Nano- and Microplastics and Knowledge Gaps: A Scoping Review.” The Science of the Total Environment, vol. 757, Elsevier B.V, 2021, pp. 143872–143872, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143872.
[10] Li, Jingyi, et al. “Microplastics in Freshwater Systems: A Review on Occurrence, Environmental Effects, and Methods for Microplastics Detection.” Water Research (Oxford), vol. 137, Elsevier Ltd, 2018, pp. 362–74, doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.056.