<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mtbrenna</id>
	<title>Soil Ecology Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mtbrenna"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php/Special:Contributions/Mtbrenna"/>
	<updated>2026-04-15T05:42:08Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2449</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2449"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:58:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Soil.jpg|thumb|A soil profile. [24]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a mixture of minerals, liquids, gases, organisms, and organic matter that when together can support life. The Earth’s soil is called the pedosphere, which has 4 main functions: it is a means of water storage, purification and supply; it is a medium for plant growth; it is habitat for organisms that modify the soil; it is a modifier of Earth’s atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Things like the lithosphere, the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the hydrosphere interact with soil. In soil there is a solid phase of organic matter and minerals, as well as a water and gas holding porous phase. [1,2,3] Soils are sometimes treated as a 3-state system of solid, liquids, and gases.[4] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is influenced by temporally interacting with factors of the [[Jenny equation]] S= f (cl, o, r, p, t, …) where S is soil formation, f is for a function of, cl is climate, o is organisms, r is relief (topography), p is parent material, and t is time. The ‘…’ was left just in case there were more factors that could be considered in the future.[5] Soil is continually being subjected to many chemical, physical, and biological processes. This includes weathering with erosion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A characteristic of most soils is that they have a dry bulk density between 1.1 and 1.6 g/cm^3, but while also having a particle density that can go from 2.6 to 2.7 g/cm^3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil science has two basic branches of study: edaphology and pedology. Edaphology is concerned with the influence of soils on living things. [6] Pedology is focused on the formation, description (morphology), and classification of soils in their natural environment. [7] In engineering terms, soil is included in the broader concept of regolith, which also includes other loose material that lies above the bedrock. [8] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Function==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a major component of the Earth&#039;s ecosystem. The world&#039;s ecosystems are impacted in far-reaching ways by the processes carried out in the soil, from ozone depletion and global warming, to rainforest destruction and water pollution. With respect to Earth&#039;s carbon cycle, soil is an important carbon reservoir, and it is potentially one of the most reactive to human disturbance and climate change. [9]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil can act as a habitat for [[soil organisms]], a regulator of water quality, an atmosphere composition modifier, an engineering medium, a recycling system for organic wastes and nutrients, and a medium of plant growth. This makes it a very import provider of ecosystem services. Since soil has a tremendous range of available niches and habitats, it contains most of the Earth&#039;s genetic diversity. A gram of soil can contain billions of organisms, belonging to thousands of species, mostly microbial and in the main still unexplored. [10] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil Horizons.gif|thumb|left|A basic diagram of the most common Master Horizons of a soil profile, with the E Horizon omitted [22]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is typically 50% pores half/half occupied with water and gas, and solids like minerals or organic matter. [11] The pore space allows for the infiltration and movement of air and water, both of which are critical for life in soil. [12] Compaction creates problems for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, soil will develop a soil profile which consists of multiple layers or [[soil horizons]] that differ in one or more [[properties]] ([[Soil Textures|texture]], structure, porosity, density, etc.). [13] They differ in thickness and don’t exhibit hard boundaries. The formation of these layers is reliant on the parent material, the modification processes of the parent materials, and soil forming factors that influence those processes. The biological influences on soil [[properties]] are strongest near the surface, while the geochemical influences on soil [[properties]] increase with depth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[soil texture]] is determined by the relative proportions of the individual particles of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] that make up the soil. The interaction of the individual mineral particles with organic matter, water, gases via biotic and abiotic processes causes those particles to flocculate (stick together) to form aggregates or peds. [14] Where these [[Aggregate formation|aggregates]] can be identified, a soil can be said to be developed, and can be described further in terms of color, porosity, consistency, reaction (acidity), etc. [[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [21]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil formation, or [[pedogenesis]], is a combination of the effects of chemical, biological, physical, and anthropogenic processes on soil parent material. Soil is formed when organic matter has accumulated and colloids are washed downward, leaving deposits of clay, humus, iron oxide, carbonate, and gypsum, producing a distinct layer called the B horizon. These constituents are moved from one level to another by water and animal activity. Resulting in the forming of layers. Movement of materials in the soil causes the forming of [[soil horizons]]. [15]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Forming Factors==&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 factors that influence how soil is formed. Those being climate, organisms, relief (topography), parent material and time. These factors make up the soil formation equation or the [[Jenny Equation]] S=f (cl, o, r, p, t). [[File:Jenny.png|The Jenny Equation [23]|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Parent Material===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parent material is the mineral material that forms soil. Igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks are the source of mineral material within soils. The parent material is transformed into a soil through being transported, deposited, physically weathered and precipitated. [16] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Physical Properties==&lt;br /&gt;
The physical [[properties]] of soil include [[Soil Textures|texture]], [[Soil Structures|structure]], bulk density, consistency, temperature, porosity, color, and resistivity. [17] [[Soil Textures|Soil texture]] is determined by the mixture proportions of 3 soil mineral particles: [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]]. At the next larger scale, [[soil structures]] called peds or more commonly soil [[Aggregate Formation|aggregates]] are created from the soil separates when iron oxides, carbonates, clay, silica and humus, coat particles and cause them to adhere into larger, relatively stable secondary structures. Bulk density is an estimate of soil compaction. Consistency is the ability for soil materials to stick to one another. Porosity is the empty space part of the soil volume which is occupied by water or gases. Temperature and color explain themselves. Resistivity has to do with the soils’ resistance to conduction of electric currents. Throughout the [[soil horizons]] these [[properties]] can vary. Soil aeration and water filtration ability can be determined from most of these [[properties]]. [18]&lt;br /&gt;
[[&lt;br /&gt;
Influence of Soil Texture on Properties of Soils [19]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Property/behavior	&lt;br /&gt;
!Sand	&lt;br /&gt;
!Silt	&lt;br /&gt;
!Clay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Water-holding capacity	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Aeration	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Drainage rate&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow to medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Soil organic matter level	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High to medium &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Decomposition of organic matter	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
	|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Warm-up in spring	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Compactability	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to wind erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate (High if fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to water erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low if aggregated, otherwise high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Shrink/Swell Potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate to very high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Sealing of ponds, dams, and landfills	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Suitability for tillage after rain	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Pollutant leaching potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless cracked) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ability to store plant nutrients	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to High	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Resistance to pH change	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Voroney, R. Paul &amp;amp; Heck, Richard J. (2007). &amp;quot;The soil habitat&amp;quot;. In Paul, Eldor A. Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry (PDF) (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 25–49. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Taylor, Sterling A. &amp;amp; Ashcroft, Gaylen L. (1972). Physical edaphology: the physics of irrigated and nonirrigated soils. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. McCarthy, David F. (2006). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Gilluly, James; Waters, Aaron Clement &amp;amp; Woodford, Alfred Oswald (1975). Principles of geology (4th ed.). San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &amp;quot;Glossary of Terms in Soil Science&amp;quot;. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Amundson, Ronald. &amp;quot;Soil preservation and the future of pedology&amp;quot; (PDF). Faculty of Natural Resources. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Simonson, Roy W. (1957). &amp;quot;What soils are&amp;quot;. The yearbook of agriculture 1957 (PDF) (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Davidson, Eric A. &amp;amp; Janssens, Ivan A. (2006). &amp;quot;Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change&amp;quot; (PDF). Nature. 440 (9 March 2006): 165‒73. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Torsvik, Vigdis &amp;amp; Øvreås, Lise (2002). &amp;quot;Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems&amp;quot; (PDF). Current Opinion in Microbiology. 5 (3): 240‒45. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7. &lt;br /&gt;
11. McClellan, Tai. &amp;quot;Soil composition&amp;quot;. University of Hawai‘i – College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. Retrieved 29 April 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. Buol, Stanley W.; Southard, Randal J.; Graham, Robert C. &amp;amp; McDaniel, Paul A. (2011). Soil genesis and classification (6th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. Bronick, Carol J. &amp;amp; Lal, Ratan (January 2005). &amp;quot;Soil structure and management: a review&amp;quot; (PDF). Geoderma. 124 (1/2): 3–22. Bibcode:2005Geode.124....3B. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. Bishop, Janice L.; Murchie, Scott L.; Pieters, Carlé L. &amp;amp; Zent, Aaron P. (2002). &amp;quot;A model for formation of dust, soil, and rock coatings on Mars: physical and chemical processes on the Martian surface&amp;quot; (PDF). Journal &lt;br /&gt;
of Geophysical Research. 107 (E11): 1–17. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5097B. doi:10.1029/2001JE001581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. Donahue, Miller &amp;amp; Shickluna 1977, pp. 20–21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. Gardner, Catriona M.K.; Laryea, Kofi Buna &amp;amp; Unger, Paul W. (1999). Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production (PDF) (1st ed.). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19. Tamboli, Prabhakar Mahadeo (1961). The influence of bulk density and aggregate size on soil moisture retention (PDF). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20. Brady, Nyle C. (1984). The nature and properties of soils (9th ed.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
21. A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
22. http://soils.usda.gov/education/resources/lessons/profile/profile.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
23. See [[Jenny Equation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
24. “SOIL FORMATION.” Science Zone Jamaica, 23 Feb. 2014, https://sciencezoneja.wordpress.com/2014/02/23/soil-formation/.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2448</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2448"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:57:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Soil.jpg|thumb|A soil profile. [24]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a mixture of minerals, liquids, gases, organisms, and organic matter that when together can support life. The Earth’s soil is called the pedosphere, which has 4 main functions: it is a means of water storage, purification and supply; it is a medium for plant growth; it is habitat for organisms that modify the soil; it is a modifier of Earth’s atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Things like the lithosphere, the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the hydrosphere interact with soil. In soil there is a solid phase of organic matter and minerals, as well as a water and gas holding porous phase. [1,2,3] Soils are sometimes treated as a 3-state system of solid, liquids, and gases.[4] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is influenced by temporally interacting with factors of the [[Jenny equation]] S= f (cl, o, r, p, t, …) where S is soil formation, f is for a function of, cl is climate, o is organisms, r is relief (topography), p is parent material, and t is time. The ‘…’ was left just in case there were more factors that could be considered in the future.[5] Soil is continually being subjected to many chemical, physical, and biological processes. This includes weathering with erosion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A characteristic of most soils is that they have a dry bulk density between 1.1 and 1.6 g/cm^3, but while also having a particle density that can go from 2.6 to 2.7 g/cm^3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil science has two basic branches of study: edaphology and pedology. Edaphology is concerned with the influence of soils on living things. [6] Pedology is focused on the formation, description (morphology), and classification of soils in their natural environment. [7] In engineering terms, soil is included in the broader concept of regolith, which also includes other loose material that lies above the bedrock. [8] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Function==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a major component of the Earth&#039;s ecosystem. The world&#039;s ecosystems are impacted in far-reaching ways by the processes carried out in the soil, from ozone depletion and global warming, to rainforest destruction and water pollution. With respect to Earth&#039;s carbon cycle, soil is an important carbon reservoir, and it is potentially one of the most reactive to human disturbance and climate change. [9]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil can act as a habitat for [[soil organisms]], a regulator of water quality, an atmosphere composition modifier, an engineering medium, a recycling system for organic wastes and nutrients, and a medium of plant growth. This makes it a very import provider of ecosystem services. Since soil has a tremendous range of available niches and habitats, it contains most of the Earth&#039;s genetic diversity. A gram of soil can contain billions of organisms, belonging to thousands of species, mostly microbial and in the main still unexplored. [10] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil Horizons.gif|thumb|left|A basic diagram of the most common Master Horizons of a soil profile, with the E Horizon omitted [22]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is typically 50% pores half/half occupied with water and gas, and solids like minerals or organic matter. [11] The pore space allows for the infiltration and movement of air and water, both of which are critical for life in soil. [12] Compaction creates problems for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, soil will develop a soil profile which consists of multiple layers or [[soil horizons]] that differ in one or more [[properties]] ([[Soil Textures|texture]], structure, porosity, density, etc.). [13] They differ in thickness and don’t exhibit hard boundaries. The formation of these layers is reliant on the parent material, the modification processes of the parent materials, and soil forming factors that influence those processes. The biological influences on soil [[properties]] are strongest near the surface, while the geochemical influences on soil [[properties]] increase with depth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[soil texture]] is determined by the relative proportions of the individual particles of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] that make up the soil. The interaction of the individual mineral particles with organic matter, water, gases via biotic and abiotic processes causes those particles to flocculate (stick together) to form aggregates or peds. [14] Where these [[Aggregate formation|aggregates]] can be identified, a soil can be said to be developed, and can be described further in terms of color, porosity, consistency, reaction (acidity), etc. [[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [21]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil formation, or [[pedogenesis]], is a combination of the effects of chemical, biological, physical, and anthropogenic processes on soil parent material. Soil is formed when organic matter has accumulated and colloids are washed downward, leaving deposits of clay, humus, iron oxide, carbonate, and gypsum, producing a distinct layer called the B horizon. These constituents are moved from one level to another by water and animal activity. Resulting in the forming of layers. Movement of materials in the soil causes the forming of [[soil horizons]]. [15]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Forming Factors==&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 factors that influence how soil is formed. Those being climate, organisms, relief (topography), parent material and time. These factors make up the soil formation equation or the [[Jenny Equation]] S=f (cl, o, r, p, t). [[File:Jenny.png|The Jenny Equation [23]|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Parent Material===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parent material is the mineral material that forms soil. Igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks are the source of mineral material within soils. The parent material is transformed into a soil through being transported, deposited, physically weathered and precipitated. [16] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Physical Properties==&lt;br /&gt;
The physical properties of soil include [[Soil Textures|texture]], [[Soil Structures|structure]], bulk density, consistency, temperature, porosity, color, and resistivity. [17] [[Soil Textures|Soil texture]] is determined by the mixture proportions of 3 soil mineral particles: [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]]. At the next larger scale, [[soil structures]] called peds or more commonly soil [[Aggregate Formation|aggregates]] are created from the soil separates when iron oxides, carbonates, clay, silica and humus, coat particles and cause them to adhere into larger, relatively stable secondary structures. Bulk density is an estimate of soil compaction. Consistency is the ability for soil materials to stick to one another. Porosity is the empty space part of the soil volume which is occupied by water or gases. Temperature and color explain themselves. Resistivity has to do with the soils’ resistance to conduction of electric currents. Throughout the [[soil horizons]] these properties can vary. Soil aeration and water filtration ability can be determined from most of these properties. [18]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Influence of Soil Texture on Properties of Soils [19]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Property/behavior	&lt;br /&gt;
!Sand	&lt;br /&gt;
!Silt	&lt;br /&gt;
!Clay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Water-holding capacity	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Aeration	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Drainage rate&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow to medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Soil organic matter level	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High to medium &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Decomposition of organic matter	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
	|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Warm-up in spring	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Compactability	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to wind erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate (High if fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to water erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low if aggregated, otherwise high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Shrink/Swell Potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate to very high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Sealing of ponds, dams, and landfills	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Suitability for tillage after rain	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Pollutant leaching potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless cracked) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ability to store plant nutrients	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to High	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Resistance to pH change	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Voroney, R. Paul &amp;amp; Heck, Richard J. (2007). &amp;quot;The soil habitat&amp;quot;. In Paul, Eldor A. Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry (PDF) (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 25–49. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Taylor, Sterling A. &amp;amp; Ashcroft, Gaylen L. (1972). Physical edaphology: the physics of irrigated and nonirrigated soils. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. McCarthy, David F. (2006). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Gilluly, James; Waters, Aaron Clement &amp;amp; Woodford, Alfred Oswald (1975). Principles of geology (4th ed.). San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &amp;quot;Glossary of Terms in Soil Science&amp;quot;. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Amundson, Ronald. &amp;quot;Soil preservation and the future of pedology&amp;quot; (PDF). Faculty of Natural Resources. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Simonson, Roy W. (1957). &amp;quot;What soils are&amp;quot;. The yearbook of agriculture 1957 (PDF) (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Davidson, Eric A. &amp;amp; Janssens, Ivan A. (2006). &amp;quot;Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change&amp;quot; (PDF). Nature. 440 (9 March 2006): 165‒73. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Torsvik, Vigdis &amp;amp; Øvreås, Lise (2002). &amp;quot;Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems&amp;quot; (PDF). Current Opinion in Microbiology. 5 (3): 240‒45. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7. &lt;br /&gt;
11. McClellan, Tai. &amp;quot;Soil composition&amp;quot;. University of Hawai‘i – College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. Retrieved 29 April 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. Buol, Stanley W.; Southard, Randal J.; Graham, Robert C. &amp;amp; McDaniel, Paul A. (2011). Soil genesis and classification (6th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. Bronick, Carol J. &amp;amp; Lal, Ratan (January 2005). &amp;quot;Soil structure and management: a review&amp;quot; (PDF). Geoderma. 124 (1/2): 3–22. Bibcode:2005Geode.124....3B. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. Bishop, Janice L.; Murchie, Scott L.; Pieters, Carlé L. &amp;amp; Zent, Aaron P. (2002). &amp;quot;A model for formation of dust, soil, and rock coatings on Mars: physical and chemical processes on the Martian surface&amp;quot; (PDF). Journal &lt;br /&gt;
of Geophysical Research. 107 (E11): 1–17. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5097B. doi:10.1029/2001JE001581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. Donahue, Miller &amp;amp; Shickluna 1977, pp. 20–21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. Gardner, Catriona M.K.; Laryea, Kofi Buna &amp;amp; Unger, Paul W. (1999). Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production (PDF) (1st ed.). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19. Tamboli, Prabhakar Mahadeo (1961). The influence of bulk density and aggregate size on soil moisture retention (PDF). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20. Brady, Nyle C. (1984). The nature and properties of soils (9th ed.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
21. A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
22. http://soils.usda.gov/education/resources/lessons/profile/profile.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
23. See [[Jenny Equation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
24. “SOIL FORMATION.” Science Zone Jamaica, 23 Feb. 2014, https://sciencezoneja.wordpress.com/2014/02/23/soil-formation/.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=2439</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=2439"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:52:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like &#039;&#039;&#039;texture by feel&#039;&#039;&#039;, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as &#039;&#039;&#039;the hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]]. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]]. The more frequently used class systems are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems, and both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Texture Classifications==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [9]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include [[sand]], sandy loam, loam, silt loam, [[silt]], sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy [[clay]], silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size ([[clay]], [[silt]], [[sand]]) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). [[Loam]] is a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of [[sand]], [[silt]], and a smaller amount of [[clay]]. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than [[loam]] itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
[&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] that you have in your given soil sample (see &#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say [[silt]], and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent [[silt]] and 35 percent [[clay]] then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Particle Sizes==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wentworth Grain size.png|230px|thumb|right|The terminology for grain size naming adapted from Wentworth by the USGS [8]]]&lt;br /&gt;
For soil, there are specific particle size ranges that determine what its components are classified as. Be it [[clay]], [[silt]], or [[sand]]. [[Clay]] particles are amongst the smallest, having diameters of less than 0.002 mm. [[Clay]] is structured in a plate-like manner which also allows for its hydroplastic properties induced by the increased surface area due to its small particle size [4]. Following [[clay]] are [[silt]] particles having diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm with the USDA classification. [[Sand]] has the largest of the particle sizes with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm. [[Sand]] is divided further due its large diameter range into the categories of very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, and very coarse sand. The USDA and WRB classifications differ only slightly in the ranges of particle diameter, but both classify [[clay]] particles with the same value. The chart to the right provides a more detailed description of the soil particles and their classifications [8].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Soil particle names&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
USDA classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
WRB classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Clay&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Silt&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.063&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.05 - 0.10&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.063 - 0.125&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.10 - 0.25&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.125 - 0.20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Medium sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.25 - 0.50&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.20 - 0.63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.50 - 1.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.63 - 1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 1.00 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.25 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Methods of Determining Soil Texture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Texture by feel Method===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Texture_by_Feel.png|280px|thumb|right|Texture by feel flowchart [10]]]&lt;br /&gt;
This method of determining soil texture is very qualitative. It allows for a quick hands-on approach to assess an estimate as to what soil class you may have. No equipment is required, just some knowledge of particular soil characteristics is needed. These soil characteristics are laid out within the texture by feel flowchart to the right [10]. The flowchart is relatively easy to follow and will help you determine your soil type [5]. Although you will be able to roughly determine what class your soil sample resides in, you won’t directly know what percentages of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] are present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To use the texture by feel flowchart, simply start by taking a small portion of your soil sample, wetting it, and trying to form it into a ribbon. This can be done by forming the soil portion into a ball and then pressing it with your fingers until it has a longer flat shape to it. If the ball resists being formed into a ribbon (falling apart) then your soil sample is most likely [[sand]]. If the ball doesn’t fall apart but also doesn’t form into a ribbon, then your soil may be a loamy sand. If the soil sample does form a ribbon, then you must determine roughly what length the ribbon is that was able to be formed. Once this is determined, follow the flowchart in the respective path of the ribbon length. Further classification is then found by feeling how gritty or smooth the soil sample feels after you excessively wet it in your palm [1]. The method of texture by feel of course takes practice, but is very useful when lab equipment is not at your disposal or if you are working in the field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Hydrometer Method===&lt;br /&gt;
The hydrometer method, developed in 1927 [7], is a very widely used way to determine soil texture through quantitative means. This method provides percentage estimates of the [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] within a given soil [6]. The major requirement for this method is the use of the chemical compound sodium hexametaphosphate. Sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent to separate aggregates of soil. To carry out this method, start by mixing some of the soil with hexametaphosphate in a test tube. Then place the solution into an orbital shaker overnight or shake the tube with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, remove the stone, and then place it in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution is then transferred to 1 liter graduated cylinders and then filled with water. The soil is then mixed to help separate the soil particles [6]. The particles separate based on their size and sink. The largest being [[sand]] particles with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm sink to the bottom first. Following are the medium-sized [[silt]] particles with diameters ranging from 0.002 mm to 0.05 mm. Then finally the smallest particles being clay with diameters less than 0.002 mm settle out above the [[silt]] layer. A soil hydrometer is then used to take the soil measurements. A soil hydrometer measures the density of a liquid compared to the density of water, or the relative density of the liquid. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution. To start the measurements, place the hydrometer into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at varying time frames. For sand, place it in for 45 seconds to measure that content. For silt, place it in for 1.5 hours. Then for [[clay]], place it in for 6-24 hours. The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded [6].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows [6]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]	 Soil Science Division Staff. 2017. Soil survey manual. C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H.C. Monger (eds.). USDA Handbook 18. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]	Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture. pp. 63–65. Retrieved 30 August 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]	Lindbo, Hayes, Adewunmi (2012). Know Soil Know Life: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation. Soil Science Society of America. p. 17. ISBN 9780891189541.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]	 Foth, Henry D. (1990). Fundamentals of Soil Science 8th Edition. Canada: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons. p. 23. ISBN 0-471-52279-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]	Thien, Steven. &amp;quot;Determining Soil Texture by the &amp;quot;Feel Method&amp;quot;&amp;quot; (PDF). NDHealth.gov.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]	Bouyoucos, George. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]	Bouyoucos G. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. American Society of Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]	Wentworth grain size chart from United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006- 1195, &amp;quot;Surficial sediment character of the Louisiana offshore continental shelf region: A GIS Compilation&amp;quot; by Jeffress Williams, Matthew A. Arsenault, Brian J. Buczkowski, Jane A. Reid, James G. Flocks, Mark A. Kulp, Shea Penland, and Chris J. Jenkins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]	A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10]	Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/edu/?cid=nrcs142p2_054311&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=2436</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=2436"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:51:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like &#039;&#039;&#039;texture by feel&#039;&#039;&#039;, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as &#039;&#039;&#039;the hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]]. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]]. The more frequently used class systems are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems, and both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Texture Classifications==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [9]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include [[sand]], sandy loam, loam, silt loam, [[silt]], sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy [[clay]], silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size ([[clay]], [[silt]], [[sand]]) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). Loam is a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of [[sand]], [[silt]], and a smaller amount of [[clay]]. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than loam itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] that you have in your given soil sample (see &#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say [[silt]], and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent [[silt]] and 35 percent [[clay]] then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Particle Sizes==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wentworth Grain size.png|230px|thumb|right|The terminology for grain size naming adapted from Wentworth by the USGS [8]]]&lt;br /&gt;
For soil, there are specific particle size ranges that determine what its components are classified as. Be it [[clay]], [[silt]], or [[sand]]. [[Clay]] particles are amongst the smallest, having diameters of less than 0.002 mm. [[Clay]] is structured in a plate-like manner which also allows for its hydroplastic properties induced by the increased surface area due to its small particle size [4]. Following [[clay]] are [[silt]] particles having diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm with the USDA classification. [[Sand]] has the largest of the particle sizes with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm. [[Sand]] is divided further due its large diameter range into the categories of very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, and very coarse sand. The USDA and WRB classifications differ only slightly in the ranges of particle diameter, but both classify [[clay]] particles with the same value. The chart to the right provides a more detailed description of the soil particles and their classifications [8].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Soil particle names&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
USDA classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
WRB classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Clay&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Silt&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.063&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.05 - 0.10&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.063 - 0.125&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.10 - 0.25&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.125 - 0.20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Medium sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.25 - 0.50&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.20 - 0.63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.50 - 1.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.63 - 1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 1.00 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.25 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Methods of Determining Soil Texture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Texture by feel Method===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Texture_by_Feel.png|280px|thumb|right|Texture by feel flowchart [10]]]&lt;br /&gt;
This method of determining soil texture is very qualitative. It allows for a quick hands-on approach to assess an estimate as to what soil class you may have. No equipment is required, just some knowledge of particular soil characteristics is needed. These soil characteristics are laid out within the texture by feel flowchart to the right [10]. The flowchart is relatively easy to follow and will help you determine your soil type [5]. Although you will be able to roughly determine what class your soil sample resides in, you won’t directly know what percentages of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] are present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To use the texture by feel flowchart, simply start by taking a small portion of your soil sample, wetting it, and trying to form it into a ribbon. This can be done by forming the soil portion into a ball and then pressing it with your fingers until it has a longer flat shape to it. If the ball resists being formed into a ribbon (falling apart) then your soil sample is most likely [[sand]]. If the ball doesn’t fall apart but also doesn’t form into a ribbon, then your soil may be a loamy sand. If the soil sample does form a ribbon, then you must determine roughly what length the ribbon is that was able to be formed. Once this is determined, follow the flowchart in the respective path of the ribbon length. Further classification is then found by feeling how gritty or smooth the soil sample feels after you excessively wet it in your palm [1]. The method of texture by feel of course takes practice, but is very useful when lab equipment is not at your disposal or if you are working in the field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Hydrometer Method===&lt;br /&gt;
The hydrometer method, developed in 1927 [7], is a very widely used way to determine soil texture through quantitative means. This method provides percentage estimates of the [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] within a given soil [6]. The major requirement for this method is the use of the chemical compound sodium hexametaphosphate. Sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent to separate aggregates of soil. To carry out this method, start by mixing some of the soil with hexametaphosphate in a test tube. Then place the solution into an orbital shaker overnight or shake the tube with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, remove the stone, and then place it in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution is then transferred to 1 liter graduated cylinders and then filled with water. The soil is then mixed to help separate the soil particles [6]. The particles separate based on their size and sink. The largest being [[sand]] particles with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm sink to the bottom first. Following are the medium-sized [[silt]] particles with diameters ranging from 0.002 mm to 0.05 mm. Then finally the smallest particles being clay with diameters less than 0.002 mm settle out above the [[silt]] layer. A soil hydrometer is then used to take the soil measurements. A soil hydrometer measures the density of a liquid compared to the density of water, or the relative density of the liquid. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution. To start the measurements, place the hydrometer into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at varying time frames. For sand, place it in for 45 seconds to measure that content. For silt, place it in for 1.5 hours. Then for [[clay]], place it in for 6-24 hours. The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded [6].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows [6]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]	 Soil Science Division Staff. 2017. Soil survey manual. C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H.C. Monger (eds.). USDA Handbook 18. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]	Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture. pp. 63–65. Retrieved 30 August 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]	Lindbo, Hayes, Adewunmi (2012). Know Soil Know Life: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation. Soil Science Society of America. p. 17. ISBN 9780891189541.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]	 Foth, Henry D. (1990). Fundamentals of Soil Science 8th Edition. Canada: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons. p. 23. ISBN 0-471-52279-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]	Thien, Steven. &amp;quot;Determining Soil Texture by the &amp;quot;Feel Method&amp;quot;&amp;quot; (PDF). NDHealth.gov.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]	Bouyoucos, George. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]	Bouyoucos G. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. American Society of Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]	Wentworth grain size chart from United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006- 1195, &amp;quot;Surficial sediment character of the Louisiana offshore continental shelf region: A GIS Compilation&amp;quot; by Jeffress Williams, Matthew A. Arsenault, Brian J. Buczkowski, Jane A. Reid, James G. Flocks, Mark A. Kulp, Shea Penland, and Chris J. Jenkins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]	A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10]	Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/edu/?cid=nrcs142p2_054311&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=2434</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=2434"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:50:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like &#039;&#039;&#039;texture by feel&#039;&#039;&#039;, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as &#039;&#039;&#039;the hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]]. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]]. The more frequently used class systems are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems, and both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Texture Classifications==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [9]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include [[sand]], sandy loam, loam, silt loam, [[silt]], sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy [[clay]], silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size ([[clay]], [[silt]], [[sand]]) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). Loam is a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of [[sand]], [[silt]], and a smaller amount of [[clay]]. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than loam itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of [[sand]], silt, and clay within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of [[sand]], silt, and clay that you have in your given soil sample (see &#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say silt, and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent silt and 35 percent [[clay]] then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Particle Sizes==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wentworth Grain size.png|230px|thumb|right|The terminology for grain size naming adapted from Wentworth by the USGS [8]]]&lt;br /&gt;
For soil, there are specific particle size ranges that determine what its components are classified as. Be it [[clay]], [[silt]], or [[sand]]. [[Clay]] particles are amongst the smallest, having diameters of less than 0.002 mm. [[Clay]] is structured in a plate-like manner which also allows for its hydroplastic properties induced by the increased surface area due to its small particle size [4]. Following [[clay]] are [[silt]] particles having diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm with the USDA classification. [[Sand]] has the largest of the particle sizes with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm. [[Sand]] is divided further due its large diameter range into the categories of very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, and very coarse sand. The USDA and WRB classifications differ only slightly in the ranges of particle diameter, but both classify [[clay]] particles with the same value. The chart to the right provides a more detailed description of the soil particles and their classifications [8].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Soil particle names&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
USDA classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
WRB classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Clay&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Silt&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.063&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.05 - 0.10&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.063 - 0.125&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.10 - 0.25&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.125 - 0.20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Medium sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.25 - 0.50&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.20 - 0.63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.50 - 1.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.63 - 1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 1.00 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.25 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Methods of Determining Soil Texture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Texture by feel Method===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Texture_by_Feel.png|280px|thumb|right|Texture by feel flowchart [10]]]&lt;br /&gt;
This method of determining soil texture is very qualitative. It allows for a quick hands-on approach to assess an estimate as to what soil class you may have. No equipment is required, just some knowledge of particular soil characteristics is needed. These soil characteristics are laid out within the texture by feel flowchart to the right [10]. The flowchart is relatively easy to follow and will help you determine your soil type [5]. Although you will be able to roughly determine what class your soil sample resides in, you won’t directly know what percentages of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] are present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To use the texture by feel flowchart, simply start by taking a small portion of your soil sample, wetting it, and trying to form it into a ribbon. This can be done by forming the soil portion into a ball and then pressing it with your fingers until it has a longer flat shape to it. If the ball resists being formed into a ribbon (falling apart) then your soil sample is most likely [[sand]]. If the ball doesn’t fall apart but also doesn’t form into a ribbon, then your soil may be a loamy sand. If the soil sample does form a ribbon, then you must determine roughly what length the ribbon is that was able to be formed. Once this is determined, follow the flowchart in the respective path of the ribbon length. Further classification is then found by feeling how gritty or smooth the soil sample feels after you excessively wet it in your palm [1]. The method of texture by feel of course takes practice, but is very useful when lab equipment is not at your disposal or if you are working in the field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Hydrometer Method===&lt;br /&gt;
The hydrometer method, developed in 1927 [7], is a very widely used way to determine soil texture through quantitative means. This method provides percentage estimates of the [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] within a given soil [6]. The major requirement for this method is the use of the chemical compound sodium hexametaphosphate. Sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent to separate aggregates of soil. To carry out this method, start by mixing some of the soil with hexametaphosphate in a test tube. Then place the solution into an orbital shaker overnight or shake the tube with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, remove the stone, and then place it in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution is then transferred to 1 liter graduated cylinders and then filled with water. The soil is then mixed to help separate the soil particles [6]. The particles separate based on their size and sink. The largest being [[sand]] particles with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm sink to the bottom first. Following are the medium-sized [[silt]] particles with diameters ranging from 0.002 mm to 0.05 mm. Then finally the smallest particles being clay with diameters less than 0.002 mm settle out above the [[silt]] layer. A soil hydrometer is then used to take the soil measurements. A soil hydrometer measures the density of a liquid compared to the density of water, or the relative density of the liquid. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution. To start the measurements, place the hydrometer into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at varying time frames. For sand, place it in for 45 seconds to measure that content. For silt, place it in for 1.5 hours. Then for [[clay]], place it in for 6-24 hours. The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded [6].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows [6]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]	 Soil Science Division Staff. 2017. Soil survey manual. C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H.C. Monger (eds.). USDA Handbook 18. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]	Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture. pp. 63–65. Retrieved 30 August 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]	Lindbo, Hayes, Adewunmi (2012). Know Soil Know Life: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation. Soil Science Society of America. p. 17. ISBN 9780891189541.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]	 Foth, Henry D. (1990). Fundamentals of Soil Science 8th Edition. Canada: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons. p. 23. ISBN 0-471-52279-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]	Thien, Steven. &amp;quot;Determining Soil Texture by the &amp;quot;Feel Method&amp;quot;&amp;quot; (PDF). NDHealth.gov.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]	Bouyoucos, George. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]	Bouyoucos G. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. American Society of Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]	Wentworth grain size chart from United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006- 1195, &amp;quot;Surficial sediment character of the Louisiana offshore continental shelf region: A GIS Compilation&amp;quot; by Jeffress Williams, Matthew A. Arsenault, Brian J. Buczkowski, Jane A. Reid, James G. Flocks, Mark A. Kulp, Shea Penland, and Chris J. Jenkins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]	A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10]	Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/edu/?cid=nrcs142p2_054311&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=2432</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=2432"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:49:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like &#039;&#039;&#039;texture by feel&#039;&#039;&#039;, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as &#039;&#039;&#039;the hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]]. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]]. The more frequently used class systems are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems, and both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Texture Classifications==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [9]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include [[sand]], sandy loam, loam, silt loam, [[silt]], sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy [[clay]], silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size ([[clay]], [[silt]], [[sand]]) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). Loam is a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of [[sand]], [[silt]], and a smaller amount of clay. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than loam itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of [[sand]], silt, and clay within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of [[sand]], silt, and clay that you have in your given soil sample (see &#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say silt, and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent silt and 35 percent clay then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Particle Sizes==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wentworth Grain size.png|230px|thumb|right|The terminology for grain size naming adapted from Wentworth by the USGS [8]]]&lt;br /&gt;
For soil, there are specific particle size ranges that determine what its components are classified as. Be it [[clay]], [[silt]], or [[sand]]. [[Clay]] particles are amongst the smallest, having diameters of less than 0.002 mm. [[Clay]] is structured in a plate-like manner which also allows for its hydroplastic properties induced by the increased surface area due to its small particle size [4]. Following [[clay]] are [[silt]] particles having diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm with the USDA classification. [[Sand]] has the largest of the particle sizes with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm. [[Sand]] is divided further due its large diameter range into the categories of very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, and very coarse sand. The USDA and WRB classifications differ only slightly in the ranges of particle diameter, but both classify clay particles with the same value. The chart to the right provides a more detailed description of the soil particles and their classifications [8].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Soil particle names&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
USDA classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
WRB classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Clay&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Silt&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.063&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.05 - 0.10&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.063 - 0.125&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.10 - 0.25&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.125 - 0.20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Medium sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.25 - 0.50&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.20 - 0.63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.50 - 1.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.63 - 1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 1.00 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.25 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Methods of Determining Soil Texture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Texture by feel Method===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Texture_by_Feel.png|280px|thumb|right|Texture by feel flowchart [10]]]&lt;br /&gt;
This method of determining soil texture is very qualitative. It allows for a quick hands-on approach to assess an estimate as to what soil class you may have. No equipment is required, just some knowledge of particular soil characteristics is needed. These soil characteristics are laid out within the texture by feel flowchart to the right [10]. The flowchart is relatively easy to follow and will help you determine your soil type [5]. Although you will be able to roughly determine what class your soil sample resides in, you won’t directly know what percentages of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] are present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To use the texture by feel flowchart, simply start by taking a small portion of your soil sample, wetting it, and trying to form it into a ribbon. This can be done by forming the soil portion into a ball and then pressing it with your fingers until it has a longer flat shape to it. If the ball resists being formed into a ribbon (falling apart) then your soil sample is most likely [[sand]]. If the ball doesn’t fall apart but also doesn’t form into a ribbon, then your soil may be a loamy sand. If the soil sample does form a ribbon, then you must determine roughly what length the ribbon is that was able to be formed. Once this is determined, follow the flowchart in the respective path of the ribbon length. Further classification is then found by feeling how gritty or smooth the soil sample feels after you excessively wet it in your palm [1]. The method of texture by feel of course takes practice, but is very useful when lab equipment is not at your disposal or if you are working in the field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Hydrometer Method===&lt;br /&gt;
The hydrometer method, developed in 1927 [7], is a very widely used way to determine soil texture through quantitative means. This method provides percentage estimates of the [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] within a given soil [6]. The major requirement for this method is the use of the chemical compound sodium hexametaphosphate. Sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent to separate aggregates of soil. To carry out this method, start by mixing some of the soil with hexametaphosphate in a test tube. Then place the solution into an orbital shaker overnight or shake the tube with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, remove the stone, and then place it in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution is then transferred to 1 liter graduated cylinders and then filled with water. The soil is then mixed to help separate the soil particles [6]. The particles separate based on their size and sink. The largest being [[sand]] particles with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm sink to the bottom first. Following are the medium-sized [[silt]] particles with diameters ranging from 0.002 mm to 0.05 mm. Then finally the smallest particles being clay with diameters less than 0.002 mm settle out above the [[silt]] layer. A soil hydrometer is then used to take the soil measurements. A soil hydrometer measures the density of a liquid compared to the density of water, or the relative density of the liquid. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution. To start the measurements, place the hydrometer into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at varying time frames. For sand, place it in for 45 seconds to measure that content. For silt, place it in for 1.5 hours. Then for [[clay]], place it in for 6-24 hours. The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded [6].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows [6]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]	 Soil Science Division Staff. 2017. Soil survey manual. C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H.C. Monger (eds.). USDA Handbook 18. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]	Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture. pp. 63–65. Retrieved 30 August 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]	Lindbo, Hayes, Adewunmi (2012). Know Soil Know Life: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation. Soil Science Society of America. p. 17. ISBN 9780891189541.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]	 Foth, Henry D. (1990). Fundamentals of Soil Science 8th Edition. Canada: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons. p. 23. ISBN 0-471-52279-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]	Thien, Steven. &amp;quot;Determining Soil Texture by the &amp;quot;Feel Method&amp;quot;&amp;quot; (PDF). NDHealth.gov.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]	Bouyoucos, George. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]	Bouyoucos G. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. American Society of Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]	Wentworth grain size chart from United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006- 1195, &amp;quot;Surficial sediment character of the Louisiana offshore continental shelf region: A GIS Compilation&amp;quot; by Jeffress Williams, Matthew A. Arsenault, Brian J. Buczkowski, Jane A. Reid, James G. Flocks, Mark A. Kulp, Shea Penland, and Chris J. Jenkins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]	A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10]	Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/edu/?cid=nrcs142p2_054311&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2424</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2424"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:44:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Soil.jpg|thumb|A soil profile. [24]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a mixture of minerals, liquids, gases, organisms, and organic matter that when together can support life. The Earth’s soil is called the pedosphere, which has 4 main functions: it is a means of water storage, purification and supply; it is a medium for plant growth; it is habitat for organisms that modify the soil; it is a modifier of Earth’s atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Things like the lithosphere, the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the hydrosphere interact with soil. In soil there is a solid phase of organic matter and minerals, as well as a water and gas holding porous phase. [1,2,3] Soils are sometimes treated as a 3-state system of solid, liquids, and gases.[4] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is influenced by temporally interacting with factors of the [[Jenny equation]] S= f (cl, o, r, p, t, …) where S is soil formation, f is for a function of, cl is climate, o is organisms, r is relief (topography), p is parent material, and t is time. The ‘…’ was left just in case there were more factors that could be considered in the future.[5] Soil is continually being subjected to many chemical, physical, and biological processes. This includes weathering with erosion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A characteristic of most soils is that they have a dry bulk density between 1.1 and 1.6 g/cm^3, but while also having a particle density that can go from 2.6 to 2.7 g/cm^3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil science has two basic branches of study: edaphology and pedology. Edaphology is concerned with the influence of soils on living things. [6] Pedology is focused on the formation, description (morphology), and classification of soils in their natural environment. [7] In engineering terms, soil is included in the broader concept of regolith, which also includes other loose material that lies above the bedrock. [8] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Function==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a major component of the Earth&#039;s ecosystem. The world&#039;s ecosystems are impacted in far-reaching ways by the processes carried out in the soil, from ozone depletion and global warming, to rainforest destruction and water pollution. With respect to Earth&#039;s carbon cycle, soil is an important carbon reservoir, and it is potentially one of the most reactive to human disturbance and climate change. [9]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil can act as a habitat for [[soil organisms]], a regulator of water quality, an atmosphere composition modifier, an engineering medium, a recycling system for organic wastes and nutrients, and a medium of plant growth. This makes it a very import provider of ecosystem services. Since soil has a tremendous range of available niches and habitats, it contains most of the Earth&#039;s genetic diversity. A gram of soil can contain billions of organisms, belonging to thousands of species, mostly microbial and in the main still unexplored. [10] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil Horizons.gif|thumb|left|A basic diagram of the most common Master Horizons of a soil profile, with the E Horizon omitted [22]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is typically 50% pores half/half occupied with water and gas, and solids like minerals or organic matter. [11] The pore space allows for the infiltration and movement of air and water, both of which are critical for life in soil. [12] Compaction creates problems for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, soil will develop a soil profile which consists of multiple layers or [[soil horizons]] that differ in one or more properties ([[Soil Textures|texture]], structure, porosity, density, etc.). [13] They differ in thickness and don’t exhibit hard boundaries. The formation of these layers is reliant on the parent material, the modification processes of the parent materials, and soil forming factors that influence those processes. The biological influences on soil properties are strongest near the surface, while the geochemical influences on soil properties increase with depth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[soil texture]] is determined by the relative proportions of the individual particles of [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]] that make up the soil. The interaction of the individual mineral particles with organic matter, water, gases via biotic and abiotic processes causes those particles to flocculate (stick together) to form aggregates or peds. [14] Where these [[Aggregate formation|aggregates]] can be identified, a soil can be said to be developed, and can be described further in terms of color, porosity, consistency, reaction (acidity), etc. [[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [21]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil formation, or [[pedogenesis]], is a combination of the effects of chemical, biological, physical, and anthropogenic processes on soil parent material. Soil is formed when organic matter has accumulated and colloids are washed downward, leaving deposits of clay, humus, iron oxide, carbonate, and gypsum, producing a distinct layer called the B horizon. These constituents are moved from one level to another by water and animal activity. Resulting in the forming of layers. Movement of materials in the soil causes the forming of [[soil horizons]]. [15]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Forming Factors==&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 factors that influence how soil is formed. Those being climate, organisms, relief (topography), parent material and time. These factors make up the soil formation equation or the [[Jenny Equation]] S=f (cl, o, r, p, t). [[File:Jenny.png|The Jenny Equation [23]|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Parent Material===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parent material is the mineral material that forms soil. Igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks are the source of mineral material within soils. The parent material is transformed into a soil through being transported, deposited, physically weathered and precipitated. [16] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Physical Properties==&lt;br /&gt;
The physical properties of soil include [[Soil Textures|texture]], [[Soil Structures|structure]], bulk density, consistency, temperature, porosity, color, and resistivity. [17] [[Soil Textures|Soil texture]] is determined by the mixture proportions of 3 soil mineral particles: [[sand]], [[silt]], and [[clay]]. At the next larger scale, [[soil structures]] called peds or more commonly soil [[Aggregate Formation|aggregates]] are created from the soil separates when iron oxides, carbonates, clay, silica and humus, coat particles and cause them to adhere into larger, relatively stable secondary structures. Bulk density is an estimate of soil compaction. Consistency is the ability for soil materials to stick to one another. Porosity is the empty space part of the soil volume which is occupied by water or gases. Temperature and color explain themselves. Resistivity has to do with the soils’ resistance to conduction of electric currents. Throughout the [[soil horizons]] these properties can vary. Soil aeration and water filtration ability can be determined from most of these properties. [18]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Influence of Soil Texture on Properties of Soils [19]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Property/behavior	&lt;br /&gt;
!Sand	&lt;br /&gt;
!Silt	&lt;br /&gt;
!Clay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Water-holding capacity	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Aeration	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Drainage rate&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow to medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Soil organic matter level	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High to medium &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Decomposition of organic matter	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
	|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Warm-up in spring	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Compactability	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to wind erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate (High if fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to water erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low if aggregated, otherwise high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Shrink/Swell Potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate to very high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Sealing of ponds, dams, and landfills	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Suitability for tillage after rain	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Pollutant leaching potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless cracked) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ability to store plant nutrients	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to High	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Resistance to pH change	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Voroney, R. Paul &amp;amp; Heck, Richard J. (2007). &amp;quot;The soil habitat&amp;quot;. In Paul, Eldor A. Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry (PDF) (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 25–49. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Taylor, Sterling A. &amp;amp; Ashcroft, Gaylen L. (1972). Physical edaphology: the physics of irrigated and nonirrigated soils. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. McCarthy, David F. (2006). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Gilluly, James; Waters, Aaron Clement &amp;amp; Woodford, Alfred Oswald (1975). Principles of geology (4th ed.). San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &amp;quot;Glossary of Terms in Soil Science&amp;quot;. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Amundson, Ronald. &amp;quot;Soil preservation and the future of pedology&amp;quot; (PDF). Faculty of Natural Resources. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Simonson, Roy W. (1957). &amp;quot;What soils are&amp;quot;. The yearbook of agriculture 1957 (PDF) (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Davidson, Eric A. &amp;amp; Janssens, Ivan A. (2006). &amp;quot;Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change&amp;quot; (PDF). Nature. 440 (9 March 2006): 165‒73. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Torsvik, Vigdis &amp;amp; Øvreås, Lise (2002). &amp;quot;Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems&amp;quot; (PDF). Current Opinion in Microbiology. 5 (3): 240‒45. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7. &lt;br /&gt;
11. McClellan, Tai. &amp;quot;Soil composition&amp;quot;. University of Hawai‘i – College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. Retrieved 29 April 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. Buol, Stanley W.; Southard, Randal J.; Graham, Robert C. &amp;amp; McDaniel, Paul A. (2011). Soil genesis and classification (6th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. Bronick, Carol J. &amp;amp; Lal, Ratan (January 2005). &amp;quot;Soil structure and management: a review&amp;quot; (PDF). Geoderma. 124 (1/2): 3–22. Bibcode:2005Geode.124....3B. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. Bishop, Janice L.; Murchie, Scott L.; Pieters, Carlé L. &amp;amp; Zent, Aaron P. (2002). &amp;quot;A model for formation of dust, soil, and rock coatings on Mars: physical and chemical processes on the Martian surface&amp;quot; (PDF). Journal &lt;br /&gt;
of Geophysical Research. 107 (E11): 1–17. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5097B. doi:10.1029/2001JE001581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. Donahue, Miller &amp;amp; Shickluna 1977, pp. 20–21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. Gardner, Catriona M.K.; Laryea, Kofi Buna &amp;amp; Unger, Paul W. (1999). Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production (PDF) (1st ed.). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19. Tamboli, Prabhakar Mahadeo (1961). The influence of bulk density and aggregate size on soil moisture retention (PDF). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20. Brady, Nyle C. (1984). The nature and properties of soils (9th ed.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
21. A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
22. http://soils.usda.gov/education/resources/lessons/profile/profile.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
23. See [[Jenny Equation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
24. “SOIL FORMATION.” Science Zone Jamaica, 23 Feb. 2014, https://sciencezoneja.wordpress.com/2014/02/23/soil-formation/.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=2419</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=2419"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:41:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like &#039;&#039;&#039;texture by feel&#039;&#039;&#039;, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as &#039;&#039;&#039;the hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include sand, silt, and clay. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of sand, silt, and clay. The more frequently used class systems are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems, and both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Texture Classifications==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [9]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include sand, sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt, sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of sand, silt, and clay present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size (clay, silt, sand) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). Loam is a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of sand, silt, and a smaller amount of clay. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than loam itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of sand, silt, and clay within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay that you have in your given soil sample (see &#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say silt, and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent silt and 35 percent clay then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Particle Sizes==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wentworth Grain size.png|230px|thumb|right|The terminology for grain size naming adapted from Wentworth by the USGS [8]]]&lt;br /&gt;
For soil, there are specific particle size ranges that determine what its components are classified as. Be it clay, silt, or sand. Clay particles are amongst the smallest, having diameters of less than 0.002 mm. Clay is structured in a plate-like manner which also allows for its hydroplastic properties induced by the increased surface area due to its small particle size [4]. Following clay are silt particles having diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm with the USDA classification. Sand has the largest of the particle sizes with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm. Sand is divided further due its large diameter range into the categories of very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, and very coarse sand. The USDA and WRB classifications differ only slightly in the ranges of particle diameter, but both classify clay particles with the same value. The chart to the right provides a more detailed description of the soil particles and their classifications [8].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Soil particle names&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
USDA classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
WRB classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Clay&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Silt&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.063&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.05 - 0.10&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.063 - 0.125&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.10 - 0.25&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.125 - 0.20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Medium sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.25 - 0.50&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.20 - 0.63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.50 - 1.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.63 - 1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 1.00 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.25 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Methods of Determining Soil Texture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Texture by feel Method===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Texture_by_Feel.png|280px|thumb|right|Texture by feel flowchart [10]]]&lt;br /&gt;
This method of determining soil texture is very qualitative. It allows for a quick hands-on approach to assess an estimate as to what soil class you may have. No equipment is required, just some knowledge of particular soil characteristics is needed. These soil characteristics are laid out within the texture by feel flowchart to the right [10]. The flowchart is relatively easy to follow and will help you determine your soil type [5]. Although you will be able to roughly determine what class your soil sample resides in, you won’t directly know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay are present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To use the texture by feel flowchart, simply start by taking a small portion of your soil sample, wetting it, and trying to form it into a ribbon. This can be done by forming the soil portion into a ball and then pressing it with your fingers until it has a longer flat shape to it. If the ball resists being formed into a ribbon (falling apart) then your soil sample is most likely sand. If the ball doesn’t fall apart but also doesn’t form into a ribbon, then your soil may be a loamy sand. If the soil sample does form a ribbon, then you must determine roughly what length the ribbon is that was able to be formed. Once this is determined, follow the flowchart in the respective path of the ribbon length. Further classification is then found by feeling how gritty or smooth the soil sample feels after you excessively wet it in your palm [1]. The method of texture by feel of course takes practice, but is very useful when lab equipment is not at your disposal or if you are working in the field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Hydrometer Method===&lt;br /&gt;
The hydrometer method, developed in 1927 [7], is a very widely used way to determine soil texture through quantitative means. This method provides percentage estimates of the sand, silt, and clay within a given soil [6]. The major requirement for this method is the use of the chemical compound sodium hexametaphosphate. Sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent to separate aggregates of soil. To carry out this method, start by mixing some of the soil with hexametaphosphate in a test tube. Then place the solution into an orbital shaker overnight or shake the tube with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, remove the stone, and then place it in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution is then transferred to 1 liter graduated cylinders and then filled with water. The soil is then mixed to help separate the soil particles [6]. The particles separate based on their size and sink. The largest being sand particles with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm sink to the bottom first. Following are the medium-sized silt particles with diameters ranging from 0.002 mm to 0.05 mm. Then finally the smallest particles being clay with diameters less than 0.002 mm settle out above the silt layer. A soil hydrometer is then used to take the soil measurements. A soil hydrometer measures the density of a liquid compared to the density of water, or the relative density of the liquid. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution. To start the measurements, place the hydrometer into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at varying time frames. For sand, place it in for 45 seconds to measure that content. For silt, place it in for 1.5 hours. Then for clay, place it in for 6-24 hours. The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded [6].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows [6]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]	 Soil Science Division Staff. 2017. Soil survey manual. C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H.C. Monger (eds.). USDA Handbook 18. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]	Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture. pp. 63–65. Retrieved 30 August 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]	Lindbo, Hayes, Adewunmi (2012). Know Soil Know Life: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation. Soil Science Society of America. p. 17. ISBN 9780891189541.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]	 Foth, Henry D. (1990). Fundamentals of Soil Science 8th Edition. Canada: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons. p. 23. ISBN 0-471-52279-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]	Thien, Steven. &amp;quot;Determining Soil Texture by the &amp;quot;Feel Method&amp;quot;&amp;quot; (PDF). NDHealth.gov.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]	Bouyoucos, George. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]	Bouyoucos G. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. American Society of Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]	Wentworth grain size chart from United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006- 1195, &amp;quot;Surficial sediment character of the Louisiana offshore continental shelf region: A GIS Compilation&amp;quot; by Jeffress Williams, Matthew A. Arsenault, Brian J. Buczkowski, Jane A. Reid, James G. Flocks, Mark A. Kulp, Shea Penland, and Chris J. Jenkins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]	A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10]	Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/edu/?cid=nrcs142p2_054311&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2416</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2416"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:40:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Soil.jpg|thumb|A soil profile. [24]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a mixture of minerals, liquids, gases, organisms, and organic matter that when together can support life. The Earth’s soil is called the pedosphere, which has 4 main functions: it is a means of water storage, purification and supply; it is a medium for plant growth; it is habitat for organisms that modify the soil; it is a modifier of Earth’s atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Things like the lithosphere, the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the hydrosphere interact with soil. In soil there is a solid phase of organic matter and minerals, as well as a water and gas holding porous phase. [1,2,3] Soils are sometimes treated as a 3-state system of solid, liquids, and gases.[4] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is influenced by temporally interacting with factors of the [[Jenny equation]] S= f (cl, o, r, p, t, …) where S is soil formation, f is for a function of, cl is climate, o is organisms, r is relief (topography), p is parent material, and t is time. The ‘…’ was left just in case there were more factors that could be considered in the future.[5] Soil is continually being subjected to many chemical, physical, and biological processes. This includes weathering with erosion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A characteristic of most soils is that they have a dry bulk density between 1.1 and 1.6 g/cm^3, but while also having a particle density that can go from 2.6 to 2.7 g/cm^3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil science has two basic branches of study: edaphology and pedology. Edaphology is concerned with the influence of soils on living things. [6] Pedology is focused on the formation, description (morphology), and classification of soils in their natural environment. [7] In engineering terms, soil is included in the broader concept of regolith, which also includes other loose material that lies above the bedrock. [8] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Function==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a major component of the Earth&#039;s ecosystem. The world&#039;s ecosystems are impacted in far-reaching ways by the processes carried out in the soil, from ozone depletion and global warming, to rainforest destruction and water pollution. With respect to Earth&#039;s carbon cycle, soil is an important carbon reservoir, and it is potentially one of the most reactive to human disturbance and climate change. [9]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil can act as a habitat for [[soil organisms]], a regulator of water quality, an atmosphere composition modifier, an engineering medium, a recycling system for organic wastes and nutrients, and a medium of plant growth. This makes it a very import provider of ecosystem services. Since soil has a tremendous range of available niches and habitats, it contains most of the Earth&#039;s genetic diversity. A gram of soil can contain billions of organisms, belonging to thousands of species, mostly microbial and in the main still unexplored. [10] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil Horizons.gif|thumb|left|A basic diagram of the most common Master Horizons of a soil profile, with the E Horizon omitted [22]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is typically 50% pores half/half occupied with water and gas, and solids like minerals or organic matter. [11] The pore space allows for the infiltration and movement of air and water, both of which are critical for life in soil. [12] Compaction creates problems for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, soil will develop a soil profile which consists of multiple layers or [[soil horizons]] that differ in one or more properties ([[Soil Textures|texture]], structure, porosity, density, etc.). [13] They differ in thickness and don’t exhibit hard boundaries. The formation of these layers is reliant on the parent material, the modification processes of the parent materials, and soil forming factors that influence those processes. The biological influences on soil properties are strongest near the surface, while the geochemical influences on soil properties increase with depth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[soil texture]] is determined by the relative proportions of the individual particles of sand, silt, and clay that make up the soil. The interaction of the individual mineral particles with organic matter, water, gases via biotic and abiotic processes causes those particles to flocculate (stick together) to form aggregates or peds. [14] Where these [[Aggregate formation|aggregates]] can be identified, a soil can be said to be developed, and can be described further in terms of color, porosity, consistency, reaction (acidity), etc. [[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [21]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil formation, or [[pedogenesis]], is a combination of the effects of chemical, biological, physical, and anthropogenic processes on soil parent material. Soil is formed when organic matter has accumulated and colloids are washed downward, leaving deposits of clay, humus, iron oxide, carbonate, and gypsum, producing a distinct layer called the B horizon. These constituents are moved from one level to another by water and animal activity. Resulting in the forming of layers. Movement of materials in the soil causes the forming of [[soil horizons]]. [15]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Forming Factors==&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 factors that influence how soil is formed. Those being climate, organisms, relief (topography), parent material and time. These factors make up the soil formation equation or the [[Jenny Equation]] S=f (cl, o, r, p, t). [[File:Jenny.png|The Jenny Equation [23]|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Parent Material===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parent material is the mineral material that forms soil. Igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks are the source of mineral material within soils. The parent material is transformed into a soil through being transported, deposited, physically weathered and precipitated. [16] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Physical Properties==&lt;br /&gt;
The physical properties of soil include [[Soil Textures|texture]], [[Soil Structures|structure]], bulk density, consistency, temperature, porosity, color, and resistivity. [17] [[Soil Textures|Soil texture]] is determined by the mixture proportions of 3 soil mineral particles: sand, silt, and clay. At the next larger scale, [[soil structures]] called peds or more commonly soil [[Aggregate Formation|aggregates]] are created from the soil separates when iron oxides, carbonates, clay, silica and humus, coat particles and cause them to adhere into larger, relatively stable secondary structures. Bulk density is an estimate of soil compaction. Consistency is the ability for soil materials to stick to one another. Porosity is the empty space part of the soil volume which is occupied by water or gases. Temperature and color explain themselves. Resistivity has to do with the soils’ resistance to conduction of electric currents. Throughout the [[soil horizons]] these properties can vary. Soil aeration and water filtration ability can be determined from most of these properties. [18]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Influence of Soil Texture on Properties of Soils [19]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Property/behavior	&lt;br /&gt;
!Sand	&lt;br /&gt;
!Silt	&lt;br /&gt;
!Clay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Water-holding capacity	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Aeration	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Drainage rate&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow to medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Soil organic matter level	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High to medium &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Decomposition of organic matter	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
	|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Warm-up in spring	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Compactability	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to wind erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate (High if fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to water erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low if aggregated, otherwise high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Shrink/Swell Potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate to very high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Sealing of ponds, dams, and landfills	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Suitability for tillage after rain	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Pollutant leaching potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless cracked) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ability to store plant nutrients	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to High	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Resistance to pH change	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Voroney, R. Paul &amp;amp; Heck, Richard J. (2007). &amp;quot;The soil habitat&amp;quot;. In Paul, Eldor A. Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry (PDF) (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 25–49. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Taylor, Sterling A. &amp;amp; Ashcroft, Gaylen L. (1972). Physical edaphology: the physics of irrigated and nonirrigated soils. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. McCarthy, David F. (2006). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Gilluly, James; Waters, Aaron Clement &amp;amp; Woodford, Alfred Oswald (1975). Principles of geology (4th ed.). San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &amp;quot;Glossary of Terms in Soil Science&amp;quot;. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Amundson, Ronald. &amp;quot;Soil preservation and the future of pedology&amp;quot; (PDF). Faculty of Natural Resources. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Simonson, Roy W. (1957). &amp;quot;What soils are&amp;quot;. The yearbook of agriculture 1957 (PDF) (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Davidson, Eric A. &amp;amp; Janssens, Ivan A. (2006). &amp;quot;Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change&amp;quot; (PDF). Nature. 440 (9 March 2006): 165‒73. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Torsvik, Vigdis &amp;amp; Øvreås, Lise (2002). &amp;quot;Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems&amp;quot; (PDF). Current Opinion in Microbiology. 5 (3): 240‒45. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7. &lt;br /&gt;
11. McClellan, Tai. &amp;quot;Soil composition&amp;quot;. University of Hawai‘i – College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. Retrieved 29 April 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. Buol, Stanley W.; Southard, Randal J.; Graham, Robert C. &amp;amp; McDaniel, Paul A. (2011). Soil genesis and classification (6th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. Bronick, Carol J. &amp;amp; Lal, Ratan (January 2005). &amp;quot;Soil structure and management: a review&amp;quot; (PDF). Geoderma. 124 (1/2): 3–22. Bibcode:2005Geode.124....3B. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. Bishop, Janice L.; Murchie, Scott L.; Pieters, Carlé L. &amp;amp; Zent, Aaron P. (2002). &amp;quot;A model for formation of dust, soil, and rock coatings on Mars: physical and chemical processes on the Martian surface&amp;quot; (PDF). Journal &lt;br /&gt;
of Geophysical Research. 107 (E11): 1–17. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5097B. doi:10.1029/2001JE001581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. Donahue, Miller &amp;amp; Shickluna 1977, pp. 20–21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. Gardner, Catriona M.K.; Laryea, Kofi Buna &amp;amp; Unger, Paul W. (1999). Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production (PDF) (1st ed.). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19. Tamboli, Prabhakar Mahadeo (1961). The influence of bulk density and aggregate size on soil moisture retention (PDF). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20. Brady, Nyle C. (1984). The nature and properties of soils (9th ed.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
21. A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
22. http://soils.usda.gov/education/resources/lessons/profile/profile.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
23. See [[Jenny Equation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
24. “SOIL FORMATION.” Science Zone Jamaica, 23 Feb. 2014, https://sciencezoneja.wordpress.com/2014/02/23/soil-formation/.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Periodical_Cicadas&amp;diff=2409</id>
		<title>Periodical Cicadas</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Periodical_Cicadas&amp;diff=2409"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:37:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Periodical Cicadas==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:cicada.jpg|280px|thumb|right|Periodical Cicada [18]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Periodical cicadas of eastern Northern America fall within the genus Magicicada. This 13-year and 17-year species are often referred to as “locusts” which is incorrect. Cicadas fall into the order Hemiptera while locusts fall into the order Orthoptera like grasshoppers [1].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 13 and 17-year lives of cicadas is spent primarily underground where they consume the xylem from the roots of eastern U.S. deciduous trees [2]. Mature cicada nymphs crawl up to the surface and emerge in the springtime after 13 or 17 years at any location, simultaneously in massive numbers. These mature adults are only active for about 4 to 6 weeks after emergence [3]. To attract mates, males conglomerate into a noisy chorus. This lifecycle is finished after about 2 months of the initial emergence, where at this point the adult cicadas are absent for another 13 or 17-year period and the eggs have been laid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
The periodical cicada has a black dorsal thorax, red eyes, and translucent wings with orange veins. Depending on the species, the abdomen underside can be black, orange, or striped with orange and black [4].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adults are usually 2.4 to 3.3 cm, which is a little smaller than most annual cicada species found in the same location of the United States. Females are larger than males at maturity [5]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Males of the Magicicada attract females by forming large aggregations that “sing” in a chorus. This chorus typically sounds like loud buzzing, ticking, or both. The characteristics of these chorus “songs” vary depending on the species [6].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cicadas are not known for biting or stinging. They have mouthparts that are used to pierce plants and suck their sap like other Auchenorrhyncha bugs. The only way a cicada can be harmful is that when being handled their proboscis can painfully pierce human skin. There is no evidence that they transmit disease and are venomous. Mature vegetation experience little threat from periodical cicadas, but planting new trees and shrubs is better to be pushed off until after their expected emergence. Twig die-off or flagging can result from egg-laying [7]. To prevent damage to young trees or shrubs during the egg-laying period, which starts a week after emergence of the first adult and lasts until females have died, they can be covered with cheesecloth or another similar material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lifecycle==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:cycle.png|150px|thumb|right|Transformation of the periodical cicada from the mature nymph to the adult [19]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:molting.jpg|150px|thumb|left|Molting Cicada [20]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:finalmolt.jpg|150px|thumb|left|Cicada in final molting stage [21]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:eggslits.jpg|150px|thumb|right|Cicada egg slits [22]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every cicada spends many years as a juvenile underground, but then emerges above ground for a small adult period that can last several weeks to a few months. All the adults of the 7 periodical cicada species emerge in any one location all at once in the same year, in a synchronized fashion. Their lifecycle of periodicity are a very long 13 to 17 years. Annual cicadas are not synchronized; some adults mature every summer while the rest of the population develops underground.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the juvenile stage periodical cicada nymphs live underground within 2 ft of the surface and feed on plant root juices [8]. These nymphs in their underground development undergo 5 instar stages (arthropod developmental stages). The difference in the 13 and 17-year lifecycle is the time taken for the maturity of the second instar. As the nymphs feed they move deeper below ground to get to larger roots during their time underground [9].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nymphs emerge when the soil temperature at about 20 cm deep is above 17.9 °C in the spring. The time of the emergence varies depending on location. In the far south the emergence occurs in late April or early May, in the far north they emerge late May to early June. When they emerge, nymphs move to complete their transformation into adults by climbing to a suitable place on nearby vegetation. After their final molt, they spend 6 days in the trees waiting for the hardening of their exoskeletons to complete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As adults, periodical cicadas only live for a few weeks; having disappeared by mid-July. Their adult lives are short lived, with the singular purpose of reproduction. Using their tymbals, males “sing” a species-specific mating song. When males “sing” they usually aggregate together which is typically sexually attractive to females. These males alternate singing and short flights from tree to tree to find females [10].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Receptive females respond to these males with timed wing-flicks that attract them for mating [11]. The sound created by a chorus can reach a deafening 100 decibels. Other than their calling song, when approaching an individual female males produce a courtship song that is distinctive [4].&lt;br /&gt;
Mating can happen multiple times for both male and females, but females mostly mate just once. The female after mating cuts V-shaped slits in bark of young twigs and lays around 20 eggs in each slit. Totaling of around 600 or more eggs. The eggs hatch into newborn nymphs that drop to the ground after about 6 to 10 weeks, where they then burrow into the ground to start another 13 or 17-year cycle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Survival Strategy==&lt;br /&gt;
===Predator Satiation=== &lt;br /&gt;
Cicada nymphs emerge synchronously in large numbers, more than 1.5 million individuals per acre sometimes [12]. This large emergence is a survival trait called predator satiation. Early after their emergence, the periodical cicadas are easy prey for birds, reptiles, cats, and other small and large mammals [3]. The overall survival mechanism of the cicadas is just to simply overwhelm predators with their large numbers, allowing for most individuals to survive. Their large period before emergence is most likely a predator avoidance strategy. This being adopted to eliminate the possibility of predators having periodic population boosts that would be synchronized with the cicada emergence [13]. Another view of why their developmental period is so long is to prevent hybridization between broods of differing cycles. This adaptation most likely resulted from cycles during a period of heavy selection pressure that were brought on by lowered and isolated populations [14].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cicada population cycles are momentous enough to affect other animals and plants. Tree growth has been observed to decrease the year before the emergence of a cicada brood, due to the increased eating by nymphs on roots [15]. The mole uses them as a food source and has shown to do well the year before an emergence, but do poorly the following year due to the reduced source of food [16]. The carcasses that are uneaten decompose on the ground providing nutrients to the soil [15]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Distribution==&lt;br /&gt;
The 17-year cicadas are found across the eastern, upper Midwestern, and Great Plains states of the U.S., but with some overlap the 13-year cicadas are found in the southern and Mississippi Valley States. Efforts are currently underway to generate new distribution maps of all periodical cicada broods. This effort makes use of crowdsourced records and records collected by entomologists [17].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]&amp;quot;Periodical Cicada&amp;quot;. magicicada.org.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Lloyd, M. &amp;amp; H.S. Dybas (1966). &amp;quot;The periodical cicada problem. I. Population ecology&amp;quot;. Evolution. 20 (2): 133–149. doi:10.2307/2406568. JSTOR 2406568.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Williams, K.S. &amp;amp; C. Simon (1995). &amp;quot;The ecology, behavior, and evolution of periodical cicadas&amp;quot; (PDF). Annual Review of Entomology. 40: 269–295. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.001413.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Alexander, Richard D.; Moore, Thomas E. (1962). &amp;quot;The Evolutionary Relationships of 17-Year and 13-Year Cicadas, and Three New Species (Homoptera, Cicadidae,Magicicada)&amp;quot; (PDF). University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. Retrieved 9 June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Capinera, John L. (2008). Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer. pp. 2785–2794. ISBN 1-4020-6242-7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] Stranahan, Nancy. &amp;quot;Nature Notes from the Eastern Forest&amp;quot;. Arc of Appalachia. Archived from the originalon 5 October 2011. Retrieved 10 June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] Cook, William M.; Robert D. Holt (2002). &amp;quot;Periodical cicada (Magicicada cassini) oviposition damage: visually impressive yet dynamically irrelevant&amp;quot; (PDF). American Midland Naturalist. 147 (2): 214–224. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2002)147[0214:PCMCOD]2.0.CO;2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 August 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Marlatt, C. L. (1907). The Periodical Cicada (Bulletin No. 71 - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. pp. 123–125.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9] White, J; Lloyd, M. (1979). &amp;quot;Seventeen year cicadas emerging after eighteen years-a new brood?&amp;quot;. Evolution. 33: 1193–1199. doi:10.2307/2407477.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10] &amp;quot;Magicicada Broods III and XXII will emerge in 2014&amp;quot;. www.magicicada.org.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[11] &amp;quot;Sexual Signals in Periodical Cicadas&amp;quot; (PDF). Behaviour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[12] Dybas, H. S.; Davis, D. D. (1962). &amp;quot;A populations census of seventeen-year periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada)&amp;quot;. Ecology. 43 (3): 432–444. doi:10.2307/1933372. JSTOR 1933372.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[13] Goles, E.; Schulz, O.; Markus, M. (2001). &amp;quot;Prime number selection of cycles in a predator-prey model&amp;quot;. Complexity. 6 (4): 33–38. doi:10.1002/cplx.1040.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[14] Cox, R. T. &amp;amp; C. E. Carlton (1988). &amp;quot;Paleoclimatic influences in the evolution of periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada spp.)&amp;quot;. American Midland Naturalist. 120 (1): 183–193. doi:10.2307/2425898. JSTOR 2425898.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[15] Yang, Louie H. (2004). &amp;quot;Periodical cicadas as resource pulses in North American forests&amp;quot;. Science. 306(5701): 1565–1567. Bibcode:2004Sci...306.1565Y. doi:10.1126/science.1103114. PMID 15567865.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[16] National Geographic: Cicada Outbreaks Linked to Other Animals&#039; Booms, Busts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[17] http://www.magicicada.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[18] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWr8fzUz-Yw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[19] &#039;&#039;Insects, their way and means of living&#039;&#039;, R. E. Snodgrass. http://www.archive.org/details/39088001578236&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[20] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cicada_Molting.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[21] http://bugoftheweek.com/blog/2013/6/10/egg-laying-in-the-treetops-imagicicadai-brood-ii&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[22] http://plotfiftyfive.blogspot.com/2016/05/magicicada.html&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2403</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2403"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:33:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Soil.jpg|thumb|A soil profile. [24]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a mixture of minerals, liquids, gases, organisms, and organic matter that when together can support life. The Earth’s soil is called the pedosphere, which has 4 main functions: it is a means of water storage, purification and supply; it is a medium for plant growth; it is habitat for organisms that modify the soil; it is a modifier of Earth’s atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
Things like the lithosphere, the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the hydrosphere interact with soil. In soil there is a solid phase of organic matter and minerals, as well as a water and gas holding porous phase [1,2,3]. Soils are sometimes treated as a 3-state system of solid, liquids, and gases [4]. &lt;br /&gt;
Soil is influenced by temporally interacting with factors of the [[Jenny equation]] S= f (cl, o, r, p, t, …) where S is soil formation, f is for a function of, cl is climate, o is organisms, r is relief (topography), p is parent material, and t is time. The ‘…’ was left just in case there were more factors that could be considered in the future [5]. Soil is continually being subjected to many chemical, physical, and biological processes. This includes weathering with erosion. &lt;br /&gt;
A characteristic of most soils is that they have a dry bulk density between 1.1 and 1.6 g/cm^3, but while also having a particle density that can go from 2.6 to 2.7 g/cm^3.&lt;br /&gt;
Soil science has two basic branches of study: edaphology and pedology. Edaphology is concerned with the influence of soils on living things. [6] Pedology is focused on the formation, description (morphology), and classification of soils in their natural environment. [7] In engineering terms, soil is included in the broader concept of regolith, which also includes other loose material that lies above the bedrock. [8] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Function==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a major component of the Earth&#039;s ecosystem. The world&#039;s ecosystems are impacted in far-reaching ways by the processes carried out in the soil, from ozone depletion and global warming, to rainforest destruction and water pollution. With respect to Earth&#039;s carbon cycle, soil is an important carbon reservoir, and it is potentially one of the most reactive to human disturbance and climate change. [9]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil can act as a habitat for [[soil organisms]], a regulator of water quality, an atmosphere composition modifier, an engineering medium, a recycling system for organic wastes and nutrients, and a medium of plant growth. This makes it a very import provider of ecosystem services. Since soil has a tremendous range of available niches and habitats, it contains most of the Earth&#039;s genetic diversity. A gram of soil can contain billions of organisms, belonging to thousands of species, mostly microbial and in the main still unexplored. [10] &lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil Horizons.gif|thumb|left|A basic diagram of the most common Master Horizons of a soil profile, with the E Horizon omitted [22]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is typically 50% pores half/half occupied with water and gas, and solids like minerals or organic matter. [11] The pore space allows for the infiltration and movement of air and water, both of which are critical for life in soil. [12] Compaction creates problems for this.&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, soil will develop a soil profile which consists of multiple layers or [[soil horizons]] that differ in one or more properties ([[Soil Textures|texture]], structure, porosity, density, etc.). [13] They differ in thickness and don’t exhibit hard boundaries. The formation of these layers is reliant on the parent material, the modification processes of the parent materials, and soil forming factors that influence those processes. The biological influences on soil properties are strongest near the surface, while the geochemical influences on soil properties increase with depth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[soil texture]] is determined by the relative proportions of the individual particles of sand, silt, and clay that make up the soil. The interaction of the individual mineral particles with organic matter, water, gases via biotic and abiotic processes causes those particles to flocculate (stick together) to form aggregates or peds. [14] Where these [[Aggregate formation|aggregates]] can be identified, a soil can be said to be developed, and can be described further in terms of color, porosity, consistency, reaction (acidity), etc. [[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [21]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil formation, or [[pedogenesis]], is a combination of the effects of chemical, biological, physical, and anthropogenic processes on soil parent material. Soil is formed when organic matter has accumulated and colloids are washed downward, leaving deposits of clay, humus, iron oxide, carbonate, and gypsum, producing a distinct layer called the B horizon. These constituents are moved from one level to another by water and animal activity. Resulting in the forming of layers. Movement of materials in the soil causes the forming of [[soil horizons]]. [15]&lt;br /&gt;
==Forming Factors==&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 factors that influence how soil is formed. Those being climate, organisms, relief (topography), parent material and time. These factors make up the soil formation equation or the [[Jenny Equation]] S=f (cl, o, r, p, t). [[File:Jenny.png|The Jenny Equation [23]|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Parent Material===&lt;br /&gt;
Parent material is the mineral material that forms soil. Igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks are the source of mineral material within soils. The parent material is transformed into a soil through being transported, deposited, physically weathered and precipitated. [16] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Physical Properties==&lt;br /&gt;
The physical properties of soil include [[Soil Textures|texture]], [[Soil Structures|structure]], bulk density, consistency, temperature, porosity, color, and resistivity. [17] [[Soil Textures|Soil texture]] is determined by the mixture proportions of 3 soil mineral particles: sand, silt, and clay. At the next larger scale, [[soil structures]] called peds or more commonly soil [[Aggregate Formation|aggregates]] are created from the soil separates when iron oxides, carbonates, clay, silica and humus, coat particles and cause them to adhere into larger, relatively stable secondary structures. Bulk density is an estimate of soil compaction. Consistency is the ability for soil materials to stick to one another. Porosity is the empty space part of the soil volume which is occupied by water or gases. Temperature and color explain themselves. Resistivity has to do with the soils’ resistance to conduction of electric currents. Throughout the [[soil horizons]] these properties can vary. Soil aeration and water filtration ability can be determined from most of these properties. [18]&lt;br /&gt;
Influence of Soil Texture on Properties of Soils [19]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Property/behavior	&lt;br /&gt;
!Sand	&lt;br /&gt;
!Silt	&lt;br /&gt;
!Clay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Water-holding capacity	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Aeration	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Drainage rate&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow to medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Soil organic matter level	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High to medium &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Decomposition of organic matter	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
	|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Warm-up in spring	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Compactability	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to wind erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate (High if fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to water erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low if aggregated, otherwise high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Shrink/Swell Potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate to very high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Sealing of ponds, dams, and landfills	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Suitability for tillage after rain	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Pollutant leaching potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless cracked) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ability to store plant nutrients	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to High	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Resistance to pH change	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Voroney, R. Paul &amp;amp; Heck, Richard J. (2007). &amp;quot;The soil habitat&amp;quot;. In Paul, Eldor A. Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry (PDF) (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 25–49. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Taylor, Sterling A. &amp;amp; Ashcroft, Gaylen L. (1972). Physical edaphology: the physics of irrigated and nonirrigated soils. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. McCarthy, David F. (2006). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Gilluly, James; Waters, Aaron Clement &amp;amp; Woodford, Alfred Oswald (1975). Principles of geology (4th ed.). San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &amp;quot;Glossary of Terms in Soil Science&amp;quot;. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Amundson, Ronald. &amp;quot;Soil preservation and the future of pedology&amp;quot; (PDF). Faculty of Natural Resources. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Simonson, Roy W. (1957). &amp;quot;What soils are&amp;quot;. The yearbook of agriculture 1957 (PDF) (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Davidson, Eric A. &amp;amp; Janssens, Ivan A. (2006). &amp;quot;Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change&amp;quot; (PDF). Nature. 440 (9 March 2006): 165‒73. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Torsvik, Vigdis &amp;amp; Øvreås, Lise (2002). &amp;quot;Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems&amp;quot; (PDF). Current Opinion in Microbiology. 5 (3): 240‒45. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7. &lt;br /&gt;
11. McClellan, Tai. &amp;quot;Soil composition&amp;quot;. University of Hawai‘i – College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. Retrieved 29 April 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. Buol, Stanley W.; Southard, Randal J.; Graham, Robert C. &amp;amp; McDaniel, Paul A. (2011). Soil genesis and classification (6th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. Bronick, Carol J. &amp;amp; Lal, Ratan (January 2005). &amp;quot;Soil structure and management: a review&amp;quot; (PDF). Geoderma. 124 (1/2): 3–22. Bibcode:2005Geode.124....3B. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. Bishop, Janice L.; Murchie, Scott L.; Pieters, Carlé L. &amp;amp; Zent, Aaron P. (2002). &amp;quot;A model for formation of dust, soil, and rock coatings on Mars: physical and chemical processes on the Martian surface&amp;quot; (PDF). Journal &lt;br /&gt;
of Geophysical Research. 107 (E11): 1–17. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5097B. doi:10.1029/2001JE001581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. Donahue, Miller &amp;amp; Shickluna 1977, pp. 20–21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. Gardner, Catriona M.K.; Laryea, Kofi Buna &amp;amp; Unger, Paul W. (1999). Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production (PDF) (1st ed.). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19. Tamboli, Prabhakar Mahadeo (1961). The influence of bulk density and aggregate size on soil moisture retention (PDF). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20. Brady, Nyle C. (1984). The nature and properties of soils (9th ed.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
21. A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
22. http://soils.usda.gov/education/resources/lessons/profile/profile.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
23. See [[Jenny Equation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
24. “SOIL FORMATION.” Science Zone Jamaica, 23 Feb. 2014, https://sciencezoneja.wordpress.com/2014/02/23/soil-formation/.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2399</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2399"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:30:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Soil.jpg|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a mixture of minerals, liquids, gases, organisms, and organic matter that when together can support life. The Earth’s soil is called the pedosphere, which has 4 main functions: it is a means of water storage, purification and supply; it is a medium for plant growth; it is habitat for organisms that modify the soil; it is a modifier of Earth’s atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
Things like the lithosphere, the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the hydrosphere interact with soil. In soil there is a solid phase of organic matter and minerals, as well as a water and gas holding porous phase [1,2,3]. Soils are sometimes treated as a 3-state system of solid, liquids, and gases [4]. &lt;br /&gt;
Soil is influenced by temporally interacting with factors of the [[Jenny equation]] S= f (cl, o, r, p, t, …) where S is soil formation, f is for a function of, cl is climate, o is organisms, r is relief (topography), p is parent material, and t is time. The ‘…’ was left just in case there were more factors that could be considered in the future [5]. Soil is continually being subjected to many chemical, physical, and biological processes. This includes weathering with erosion. &lt;br /&gt;
A characteristic of most soils is that they have a dry bulk density between 1.1 and 1.6 g/cm^3, but while also having a particle density that can go from 2.6 to 2.7 g/cm^3.&lt;br /&gt;
Soil science has two basic branches of study: edaphology and pedology. Edaphology is concerned with the influence of soils on living things. [6] Pedology is focused on the formation, description (morphology), and classification of soils in their natural environment. [7] In engineering terms, soil is included in the broader concept of regolith, which also includes other loose material that lies above the bedrock. [8] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Function==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a major component of the Earth&#039;s ecosystem. The world&#039;s ecosystems are impacted in far-reaching ways by the processes carried out in the soil, from ozone depletion and global warming, to rainforest destruction and water pollution. With respect to Earth&#039;s carbon cycle, soil is an important carbon reservoir, and it is potentially one of the most reactive to human disturbance and climate change. [9]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil can act as a habitat for [[soil organisms]], a regulator of water quality, an atmosphere composition modifier, an engineering medium, a recycling system for organic wastes and nutrients, and a medium of plant growth. This makes it a very import provider of ecosystem services. Since soil has a tremendous range of available niches and habitats, it contains most of the Earth&#039;s genetic diversity. A gram of soil can contain billions of organisms, belonging to thousands of species, mostly microbial and in the main still unexplored. [10] &lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil Horizons.gif|thumb|left|A basic diagram of the most common Master Horizons of a soil profile, with the E Horizon omitted [22]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is typically 50% pores half/half occupied with water and gas, and solids like minerals or organic matter. [11] The pore space allows for the infiltration and movement of air and water, both of which are critical for life in soil. [12] Compaction creates problems for this.&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, soil will develop a soil profile which consists of multiple layers or [[soil horizons]] that differ in one or more properties ([[Soil Textures|texture]], structure, porosity, density, etc.). [13] They differ in thickness and don’t exhibit hard boundaries. The formation of these layers is reliant on the parent material, the modification processes of the parent materials, and soil forming factors that influence those processes. The biological influences on soil properties are strongest near the surface, while the geochemical influences on soil properties increase with depth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[soil texture]] is determined by the relative proportions of the individual particles of sand, silt, and clay that make up the soil. The interaction of the individual mineral particles with organic matter, water, gases via biotic and abiotic processes causes those particles to flocculate (stick together) to form aggregates or peds. [14] Where these [[Aggregate formation|aggregates]] can be identified, a soil can be said to be developed, and can be described further in terms of color, porosity, consistency, reaction (acidity), etc. [[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [21]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil formation, or [[pedogenesis]], is a combination of the effects of chemical, biological, physical, and anthropogenic processes on soil parent material. Soil is formed when organic matter has accumulated and colloids are washed downward, leaving deposits of clay, humus, iron oxide, carbonate, and gypsum, producing a distinct layer called the B horizon. These constituents are moved from one level to another by water and animal activity. Resulting in the forming of layers. Movement of materials in the soil causes the forming of [[soil horizons]]. [15]&lt;br /&gt;
==Forming Factors==&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 factors that influence how soil is formed. Those being climate, organisms, relief (topography), parent material and time. These factors make up the soil formation equation or the [[Jenny Equation]] S=f (cl, o, r, p, t). [[File:Jenny.png|[23]|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Parent Material===&lt;br /&gt;
Parent material is the mineral material that forms soil. Igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks are the source of mineral material within soils. The parent material is transformed into a soil through being transported, deposited, physically weathered and precipitated. [16] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Physical Properties==&lt;br /&gt;
The physical properties of soil include [[Soil Textures|texture]], [[Soil Structures|structure]], bulk density, consistency, temperature, porosity, color, and resistivity. [17] [[Soil Textures|Soil texture]] is determined by the mixture proportions of 3 soil mineral particles: sand, silt, and clay. At the next larger scale, [[soil structures]] called peds or more commonly soil [[Aggregate Formation|aggregates]] are created from the soil separates when iron oxides, carbonates, clay, silica and humus, coat particles and cause them to adhere into larger, relatively stable secondary structures. Bulk density is an estimate of soil compaction. Consistency is the ability for soil materials to stick to one another. Porosity is the empty space part of the soil volume which is occupied by water or gases. Temperature and color explain themselves. Resistivity has to do with the soils’ resistance to conduction of electric currents. Throughout the [[soil horizons]] these properties can vary. Soil aeration and water filtration ability can be determined from most of these properties. [18]&lt;br /&gt;
Influence of Soil Texture on Properties of Soils [19]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Property/behavior	&lt;br /&gt;
!Sand	&lt;br /&gt;
!Silt	&lt;br /&gt;
!Clay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Water-holding capacity	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Aeration	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Drainage rate&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow to medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Soil organic matter level	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High to medium &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Decomposition of organic matter	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
	|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Warm-up in spring	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Compactability	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to wind erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate (High if fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to water erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low if aggregated, otherwise high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Shrink/Swell Potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate to very high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Sealing of ponds, dams, and landfills	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Suitability for tillage after rain	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Pollutant leaching potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless cracked) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ability to store plant nutrients	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to High	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Resistance to pH change	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Voroney, R. Paul &amp;amp; Heck, Richard J. (2007). &amp;quot;The soil habitat&amp;quot;. In Paul, Eldor A. Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry (PDF) (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 25–49. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Taylor, Sterling A. &amp;amp; Ashcroft, Gaylen L. (1972). Physical edaphology: the physics of irrigated and nonirrigated soils. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. McCarthy, David F. (2006). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Gilluly, James; Waters, Aaron Clement &amp;amp; Woodford, Alfred Oswald (1975). Principles of geology (4th ed.). San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &amp;quot;Glossary of Terms in Soil Science&amp;quot;. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Amundson, Ronald. &amp;quot;Soil preservation and the future of pedology&amp;quot; (PDF). Faculty of Natural Resources. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Simonson, Roy W. (1957). &amp;quot;What soils are&amp;quot;. The yearbook of agriculture 1957 (PDF) (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Davidson, Eric A. &amp;amp; Janssens, Ivan A. (2006). &amp;quot;Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change&amp;quot; (PDF). Nature. 440 (9 March 2006): 165‒73. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Torsvik, Vigdis &amp;amp; Øvreås, Lise (2002). &amp;quot;Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems&amp;quot; (PDF). Current Opinion in Microbiology. 5 (3): 240‒45. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7. &lt;br /&gt;
11. McClellan, Tai. &amp;quot;Soil composition&amp;quot;. University of Hawai‘i – College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. Retrieved 29 April 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. Buol, Stanley W.; Southard, Randal J.; Graham, Robert C. &amp;amp; McDaniel, Paul A. (2011). Soil genesis and classification (6th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. Bronick, Carol J. &amp;amp; Lal, Ratan (January 2005). &amp;quot;Soil structure and management: a review&amp;quot; (PDF). Geoderma. 124 (1/2): 3–22. Bibcode:2005Geode.124....3B. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. Bishop, Janice L.; Murchie, Scott L.; Pieters, Carlé L. &amp;amp; Zent, Aaron P. (2002). &amp;quot;A model for formation of dust, soil, and rock coatings on Mars: physical and chemical processes on the Martian surface&amp;quot; (PDF). Journal &lt;br /&gt;
of Geophysical Research. 107 (E11): 1–17. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5097B. doi:10.1029/2001JE001581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. Donahue, Miller &amp;amp; Shickluna 1977, pp. 20–21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. Gardner, Catriona M.K.; Laryea, Kofi Buna &amp;amp; Unger, Paul W. (1999). Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production (PDF) (1st ed.). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19. Tamboli, Prabhakar Mahadeo (1961). The influence of bulk density and aggregate size on soil moisture retention (PDF). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20. Brady, Nyle C. (1984). The nature and properties of soils (9th ed.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
21. A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
22. http://soils.usda.gov/education/resources/lessons/profile/profile.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
23. See [[Jenny Equation]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2398</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2398"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:28:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Soil.jpg|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a mixture of minerals, liquids, gases, organisms, and organic matter that when together can support life. The Earth’s soil is called the pedosphere, which has 4 main functions: it is a means of water storage, purification and supply; it is a medium for plant growth; it is habitat for organisms that modify the soil; it is a modifier of Earth’s atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
Things like the lithosphere, the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the hydrosphere interact with soil. In soil there is a solid phase of organic matter and minerals, as well as a water and gas holding porous phase [1,2,3]. Soils are sometimes treated as a 3-state system of solid, liquids, and gases [4]. &lt;br /&gt;
Soil is influenced by temporally interacting with factors of the equation S= f (cl, o, r, p, t, …) where S is soil formation, f is for a function of, cl is climate, o is organisms, r is relief (topography), p is parent material, and t is time. The ‘…’ was left just in case there were more factors that could be considered in the future [5]. Soil is continually being subjected to many chemical, physical, and biological processes. This includes weathering with erosion. &lt;br /&gt;
A characteristic of most soils is that they have a dry bulk density between 1.1 and 1.6 g/cm^3, but while also having a particle density that can go from 2.6 to 2.7 g/cm^3.&lt;br /&gt;
Soil science has two basic branches of study: edaphology and pedology. Edaphology is concerned with the influence of soils on living things. [6] Pedology is focused on the formation, description (morphology), and classification of soils in their natural environment. [7] In engineering terms, soil is included in the broader concept of regolith, which also includes other loose material that lies above the bedrock. [8] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Function==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a major component of the Earth&#039;s ecosystem. The world&#039;s ecosystems are impacted in far-reaching ways by the processes carried out in the soil, from ozone depletion and global warming, to rainforest destruction and water pollution. With respect to Earth&#039;s carbon cycle, soil is an important carbon reservoir, and it is potentially one of the most reactive to human disturbance and climate change. [9]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil can act as a habitat for [[soil organisms]], a regulator of water quality, an atmosphere composition modifier, an engineering medium, a recycling system for organic wastes and nutrients, and a medium of plant growth. This makes it a very import provider of ecosystem services. Since soil has a tremendous range of available niches and habitats, it contains most of the Earth&#039;s genetic diversity. A gram of soil can contain billions of organisms, belonging to thousands of species, mostly microbial and in the main still unexplored. [10] &lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil Horizons.gif|thumb|left|A basic diagram of the most common Master Horizons of a soil profile, with the E Horizon omitted [22]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is typically 50% pores half/half occupied with water and gas, and solids like minerals or organic matter. [11] The pore space allows for the infiltration and movement of air and water, both of which are critical for life in soil. [12] Compaction creates problems for this.&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, soil will develop a soil profile which consists of multiple layers or [[soil horizons]] that differ in one or more properties ([[Soil Textures|texture]], structure, porosity, density, etc.). [13] They differ in thickness and don’t exhibit hard boundaries. The formation of these layers is reliant on the parent material, the modification processes of the parent materials, and soil forming factors that influence those processes. The biological influences on soil properties are strongest near the surface, while the geochemical influences on soil properties increase with depth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[soil texture]] is determined by the relative proportions of the individual particles of sand, silt, and clay that make up the soil. The interaction of the individual mineral particles with organic matter, water, gases via biotic and abiotic processes causes those particles to flocculate (stick together) to form aggregates or peds. [14] Where these [[Aggregate formation|aggregates]] can be identified, a soil can be said to be developed, and can be described further in terms of color, porosity, consistency, reaction (acidity), etc. [[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [21]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil formation, or [[pedogenesis]], is a combination of the effects of chemical, biological, physical, and anthropogenic processes on soil parent material. Soil is formed when organic matter has accumulated and colloids are washed downward, leaving deposits of clay, humus, iron oxide, carbonate, and gypsum, producing a distinct layer called the B horizon. These constituents are moved from one level to another by water and animal activity. Resulting in the forming of layers. Movement of materials in the soil causes the forming of [[soil horizons]]. [15]&lt;br /&gt;
==Forming Factors==&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 factors that influence how soil is formed. Those being climate, organisms, relief (topography), parent material and time. These factors make up the soil formation equation or the [[Jenny Equation]] S=f (cl, o, r, p, t). [[File:Jenny.png|[23]|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Parent Material===&lt;br /&gt;
Parent material is the mineral material that forms soil. Igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks are the source of mineral material within soils. The parent material is transformed into a soil through being transported, deposited, physically weathered and precipitated. [16] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Physical Properties==&lt;br /&gt;
The physical properties of soil include [[Soil Textures|texture]], [[Soil Structures|structure]], bulk density, consistency, temperature, porosity, color, and resistivity. [17] [[Soil Textures|Soil texture]] is determined by the mixture proportions of 3 soil mineral particles: sand, silt, and clay. At the next larger scale, [[soil structures]] called peds or more commonly soil [[Aggregate Formation|aggregates]] are created from the soil separates when iron oxides, carbonates, clay, silica and humus, coat particles and cause them to adhere into larger, relatively stable secondary structures. Bulk density is an estimate of soil compaction. Consistency is the ability for soil materials to stick to one another. Porosity is the empty space part of the soil volume which is occupied by water or gases. Temperature and color explain themselves. Resistivity has to do with the soils’ resistance to conduction of electric currents. Throughout the [[soil horizons]] these properties can vary. Soil aeration and water filtration ability can be determined from most of these properties. [18]&lt;br /&gt;
Influence of Soil Texture on Properties of Soils [19]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Property/behavior	&lt;br /&gt;
!Sand	&lt;br /&gt;
!Silt	&lt;br /&gt;
!Clay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Water-holding capacity	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Aeration	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Drainage rate&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow to medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Soil organic matter level	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High to medium &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Decomposition of organic matter	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
	|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Warm-up in spring	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Compactability	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to wind erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate (High if fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to water erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low if aggregated, otherwise high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Shrink/Swell Potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate to very high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Sealing of ponds, dams, and landfills	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Suitability for tillage after rain	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Pollutant leaching potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless cracked) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ability to store plant nutrients	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to High	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Resistance to pH change	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Voroney, R. Paul &amp;amp; Heck, Richard J. (2007). &amp;quot;The soil habitat&amp;quot;. In Paul, Eldor A. Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry (PDF) (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 25–49. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Taylor, Sterling A. &amp;amp; Ashcroft, Gaylen L. (1972). Physical edaphology: the physics of irrigated and nonirrigated soils. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. McCarthy, David F. (2006). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Gilluly, James; Waters, Aaron Clement &amp;amp; Woodford, Alfred Oswald (1975). Principles of geology (4th ed.). San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &amp;quot;Glossary of Terms in Soil Science&amp;quot;. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Amundson, Ronald. &amp;quot;Soil preservation and the future of pedology&amp;quot; (PDF). Faculty of Natural Resources. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Simonson, Roy W. (1957). &amp;quot;What soils are&amp;quot;. The yearbook of agriculture 1957 (PDF) (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Davidson, Eric A. &amp;amp; Janssens, Ivan A. (2006). &amp;quot;Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change&amp;quot; (PDF). Nature. 440 (9 March 2006): 165‒73. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Torsvik, Vigdis &amp;amp; Øvreås, Lise (2002). &amp;quot;Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems&amp;quot; (PDF). Current Opinion in Microbiology. 5 (3): 240‒45. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7. &lt;br /&gt;
11. McClellan, Tai. &amp;quot;Soil composition&amp;quot;. University of Hawai‘i – College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. Retrieved 29 April 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. Buol, Stanley W.; Southard, Randal J.; Graham, Robert C. &amp;amp; McDaniel, Paul A. (2011). Soil genesis and classification (6th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. Bronick, Carol J. &amp;amp; Lal, Ratan (January 2005). &amp;quot;Soil structure and management: a review&amp;quot; (PDF). Geoderma. 124 (1/2): 3–22. Bibcode:2005Geode.124....3B. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. Bishop, Janice L.; Murchie, Scott L.; Pieters, Carlé L. &amp;amp; Zent, Aaron P. (2002). &amp;quot;A model for formation of dust, soil, and rock coatings on Mars: physical and chemical processes on the Martian surface&amp;quot; (PDF). Journal &lt;br /&gt;
of Geophysical Research. 107 (E11): 1–17. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5097B. doi:10.1029/2001JE001581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. Donahue, Miller &amp;amp; Shickluna 1977, pp. 20–21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. Gardner, Catriona M.K.; Laryea, Kofi Buna &amp;amp; Unger, Paul W. (1999). Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production (PDF) (1st ed.). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19. Tamboli, Prabhakar Mahadeo (1961). The influence of bulk density and aggregate size on soil moisture retention (PDF). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20. Brady, Nyle C. (1984). The nature and properties of soils (9th ed.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
21. A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
22. http://soils.usda.gov/education/resources/lessons/profile/profile.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
23. See [[Jenny Equation]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2394</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2394"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:25:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a mixture of minerals, liquids, gases, organisms, and organic matter that when together can support life. The Earth’s soil is called the pedosphere, which has 4 main functions: it is a means of water storage, purification and supply; it is a medium for plant growth; it is habitat for organisms that modify the soil; it is a modifier of Earth’s atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
Things like the lithosphere, the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the hydrosphere interact with soil. In soil there is a solid phase of organic matter and minerals, as well as a water and gas holding porous phase [1,2,3]. Soils are sometimes treated as a 3-state system of solid, liquids, and gases [4]. &lt;br /&gt;
Soil is influenced by temporally interacting with factors of the equation S= f (cl, o, r, p, t, …) where S is soil formation, f is for a function of, cl is climate, o is organisms, r is relief (topography), p is parent material, and t is time. The ‘…’ was left just in case there were more factors that could be considered in the future [5]. Soil is continually being subjected to many chemical, physical, and biological processes. This includes weathering with erosion. [[File:Jenny.png|[23]|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
A characteristic of most soils is that they have a dry bulk density between 1.1 and 1.6 g/cm^3, but while also having a particle density that can go from 2.6 to 2.7 g/cm^3.&lt;br /&gt;
Soil science has two basic branches of study: edaphology and pedology. Edaphology is concerned with the influence of soils on living things. [6] Pedology is focused on the formation, description (morphology), and classification of soils in their natural environment. [7] In engineering terms, soil is included in the broader concept of regolith, which also includes other loose material that lies above the bedrock. [8] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Function==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a major component of the Earth&#039;s ecosystem. The world&#039;s ecosystems are impacted in far-reaching ways by the processes carried out in the soil, from ozone depletion and global warming, to rainforest destruction and water pollution. With respect to Earth&#039;s carbon cycle, soil is an important carbon reservoir, and it is potentially one of the most reactive to human disturbance and climate change. [9]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil can act as a habitat for [[soil organisms]], a regulator of water quality, an atmosphere composition modifier, an engineering medium, a recycling system for organic wastes and nutrients, and a medium of plant growth. This makes it a very import provider of ecosystem services. Since soil has a tremendous range of available niches and habitats, it contains most of the Earth&#039;s genetic diversity. A gram of soil can contain billions of organisms, belonging to thousands of species, mostly microbial and in the main still unexplored. [10] &lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil Horizons.gif|thumb|left|A basic diagram of the most common Master Horizons of a soil profile, with the E Horizon omitted [22]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is typically 50% pores half/half occupied with water and gas, and solids like minerals or organic matter. [11] The pore space allows for the infiltration and movement of air and water, both of which are critical for life in soil. [12] Compaction creates problems for this.&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, soil will develop a soil profile which consists of multiple layers or [[soil horizons]] that differ in one or more properties ([[Soil Textures|texture]], structure, porosity, density, etc.). [13] They differ in thickness and don’t exhibit hard boundaries. The formation of these layers is reliant on the parent material, the modification processes of the parent materials, and soil forming factors that influence those processes. The biological influences on soil properties are strongest near the surface, while the geochemical influences on soil properties increase with depth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[soil texture]] is determined by the relative proportions of the individual particles of sand, silt, and clay that make up the soil. The interaction of the individual mineral particles with organic matter, water, gases via biotic and abiotic processes causes those particles to flocculate (stick together) to form aggregates or peds. [14] Where these [[Aggregate formation|aggregates]] can be identified, a soil can be said to be developed, and can be described further in terms of color, porosity, consistency, reaction (acidity), etc. [[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [21]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil formation, or [[pedogenesis]], is a combination of the effects of chemical, biological, physical, and anthropogenic processes on soil parent material. Soil is formed when organic matter has accumulated and colloids are washed downward, leaving deposits of clay, humus, iron oxide, carbonate, and gypsum, producing a distinct layer called the B horizon. These constituents are moved from one level to another by water and animal activity. Resulting in the forming of layers. Movement of materials in the soil causes the forming of [[soil horizons]]. [15]&lt;br /&gt;
==Forming Factors==&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 factors that influence how soil is formed. Those being climate, organisms, relief (topography), parent material and time. These factors make up the soil formation equation or the [[Jenny Equation]] S=f (cl, o, r, p, t).&lt;br /&gt;
===Parent Material===&lt;br /&gt;
Parent material is the mineral material that forms soil. Igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks are the source of mineral material within soils. The parent material is transformed into a soil through being transported, deposited, physically weathered and precipitated. [16] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Physical Properties==&lt;br /&gt;
The physical properties of soil include [[Soil Textures|texture]], [[Soil Structures|structure]], bulk density, consistency, temperature, porosity, color, and resistivity. [17] [[Soil Textures|Soil texture]] is determined by the mixture proportions of 3 soil mineral particles: sand, silt, and clay. At the next larger scale, [[soil structures]] called peds or more commonly soil [[Aggregate Formation|aggregates]] are created from the soil separates when iron oxides, carbonates, clay, silica and humus, coat particles and cause them to adhere into larger, relatively stable secondary structures. Bulk density is an estimate of soil compaction. Consistency is the ability for soil materials to stick to one another. Porosity is the empty space part of the soil volume which is occupied by water or gases. Temperature and color explain themselves. Resistivity has to do with the soils’ resistance to conduction of electric currents. Throughout the [[soil horizons]] these properties can vary. Soil aeration and water filtration ability can be determined from most of these properties. [18]&lt;br /&gt;
Influence of Soil Texture on Properties of Soils [19]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Property/behavior	&lt;br /&gt;
!Sand	&lt;br /&gt;
!Silt	&lt;br /&gt;
!Clay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Water-holding capacity	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Aeration	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Drainage rate&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow to medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Soil organic matter level	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High to medium &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Decomposition of organic matter	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
	|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Warm-up in spring	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Compactability	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to wind erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate (High if fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to water erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low if aggregated, otherwise high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Shrink/Swell Potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate to very high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Sealing of ponds, dams, and landfills	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Suitability for tillage after rain	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Pollutant leaching potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless cracked) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ability to store plant nutrients	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to High	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Resistance to pH change	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Voroney, R. Paul &amp;amp; Heck, Richard J. (2007). &amp;quot;The soil habitat&amp;quot;. In Paul, Eldor A. Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry (PDF) (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 25–49. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Taylor, Sterling A. &amp;amp; Ashcroft, Gaylen L. (1972). Physical edaphology: the physics of irrigated and nonirrigated soils. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. McCarthy, David F. (2006). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Gilluly, James; Waters, Aaron Clement &amp;amp; Woodford, Alfred Oswald (1975). Principles of geology (4th ed.). San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &amp;quot;Glossary of Terms in Soil Science&amp;quot;. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Amundson, Ronald. &amp;quot;Soil preservation and the future of pedology&amp;quot; (PDF). Faculty of Natural Resources. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Simonson, Roy W. (1957). &amp;quot;What soils are&amp;quot;. The yearbook of agriculture 1957 (PDF) (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Davidson, Eric A. &amp;amp; Janssens, Ivan A. (2006). &amp;quot;Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change&amp;quot; (PDF). Nature. 440 (9 March 2006): 165‒73. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Torsvik, Vigdis &amp;amp; Øvreås, Lise (2002). &amp;quot;Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems&amp;quot; (PDF). Current Opinion in Microbiology. 5 (3): 240‒45. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7. &lt;br /&gt;
11. McClellan, Tai. &amp;quot;Soil composition&amp;quot;. University of Hawai‘i – College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. Retrieved 29 April 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. Buol, Stanley W.; Southard, Randal J.; Graham, Robert C. &amp;amp; McDaniel, Paul A. (2011). Soil genesis and classification (6th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. Bronick, Carol J. &amp;amp; Lal, Ratan (January 2005). &amp;quot;Soil structure and management: a review&amp;quot; (PDF). Geoderma. 124 (1/2): 3–22. Bibcode:2005Geode.124....3B. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. Bishop, Janice L.; Murchie, Scott L.; Pieters, Carlé L. &amp;amp; Zent, Aaron P. (2002). &amp;quot;A model for formation of dust, soil, and rock coatings on Mars: physical and chemical processes on the Martian surface&amp;quot; (PDF). Journal &lt;br /&gt;
of Geophysical Research. 107 (E11): 1–17. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5097B. doi:10.1029/2001JE001581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. Donahue, Miller &amp;amp; Shickluna 1977, pp. 20–21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. Gardner, Catriona M.K.; Laryea, Kofi Buna &amp;amp; Unger, Paul W. (1999). Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production (PDF) (1st ed.). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19. Tamboli, Prabhakar Mahadeo (1961). The influence of bulk density and aggregate size on soil moisture retention (PDF). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20. Brady, Nyle C. (1984). The nature and properties of soils (9th ed.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
21. A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
22. http://soils.usda.gov/education/resources/lessons/profile/profile.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
23. See [[Jenny Equation]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2391</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2391"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:23:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a mixture of minerals, liquids, gases, organisms, and organic matter that when together can support life. The Earth’s soil is called the pedosphere, which has 4 main functions: it is a means of water storage, purification and supply; it is a medium for plant growth; it is habitat for organisms that modify the soil; it is a modifier of Earth’s atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
Things like the lithosphere, the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the hydrosphere interact with soil. In soil there is a solid phase of organic matter and minerals, as well as a water and gas holding porous phase [1,2,3]. Soils are sometimes treated as a 3-state system of solid, liquids, and gases [4]. &lt;br /&gt;
Soil is influenced by temporally interacting with factors of the equation S= f (cl, o, r, p, t, …) where S is soil formation, f is for a function of, cl is climate, o is organisms, r is relief (topography), p is parent material, and t is time. The ‘…’ was left just in case there were more factors that could be considered in the future [5]. Soil is continually being subjected to many chemical, physical, and biological processes. This includes weathering with erosion. [[File:Jenny.png|[23]|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
A characteristic of most soils is that they have a dry bulk density between 1.1 and 1.6 g/cm^3, but while also having a particle density that can go from 2.6 to 2.7 g/cm^3.&lt;br /&gt;
Soil science has two basic branches of study: edaphology and pedology. Edaphology is concerned with the influence of soils on living things. [6] Pedology is focused on the formation, description (morphology), and classification of soils in their natural environment. [7] In engineering terms, soil is included in the broader concept of regolith, which also includes other loose material that lies above the bedrock. [8] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Function==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a major component of the Earth&#039;s ecosystem. The world&#039;s ecosystems are impacted in far-reaching ways by the processes carried out in the soil, from ozone depletion and global warming, to rainforest destruction and water pollution. With respect to Earth&#039;s carbon cycle, soil is an important carbon reservoir, and it is potentially one of the most reactive to human disturbance and climate change. [9]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil can act as a habitat for [[soil organisms]], a regulator of water quality, an atmosphere composition modifier, an engineering medium, a recycling system for organic wastes and nutrients, and a medium of plant growth. This makes it a very import provider of ecosystem services. Since soil has a tremendous range of available niches and habitats, it contains most of the Earth&#039;s genetic diversity. A gram of soil can contain billions of organisms, belonging to thousands of species, mostly microbial and in the main still unexplored. [10] &lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil Horizons.gif|thumb|left|A basic diagram of the most common Master Horizons of a soil profile, with the E Horizon omitted [22]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is typically 50% pores half/half occupied with water and gas, and solids like minerals or organic matter. [11] The pore space allows for the infiltration and movement of air and water, both of which are critical for life in soil. [12] Compaction creates problems for this.&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, soil will develop a soil profile which consists of multiple layers or [[soil horizons]] that differ in one or more properties ([[Soil Textures|texture]], structure, porosity, density, etc.). [13] They differ in thickness and don’t exhibit hard boundaries. The formation of these layers is reliant on the parent material, the modification processes of the parent materials, and soil forming factors that influence those processes. The biological influences on soil properties are strongest near the surface, while the geochemical influences on soil properties increase with depth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[soil texture]] is determined by the relative proportions of the individual particles of sand, silt, and clay that make up the soil. The interaction of the individual mineral particles with organic matter, water, gases via biotic and abiotic processes causes those particles to flocculate (stick together) to form aggregates or peds. [14] Where these [[Aggregate formation|aggregates]] can be identified, a soil can be said to be developed, and can be described further in terms of color, porosity, consistency, reaction (acidity), etc. [[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [21]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil formation, or [[pedogenesis]], is a combination of the effects of chemical, biological, physical, and anthropogenic processes on soil parent material. Soil is formed when organic matter has accumulated and colloids are washed downward, leaving deposits of clay, humus, iron oxide, carbonate, and gypsum, producing a distinct layer called the B horizon. These constituents are moved from one level to another by water and animal activity. Resulting in the forming of layers. Movement of materials in the soil causes the forming of [[soil horizons]]. [15]&lt;br /&gt;
==Forming Factors==&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 factors that influence how soil is formed. Those being climate, organisms, relief (topography), parent material and time. These factors make up the soil formation equation S=f (cl, o, r, p, t).&lt;br /&gt;
===Parent Material===&lt;br /&gt;
Parent material is the mineral material that forms soil. Igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks are the source of mineral material within soils. The parent material is transformed into a soil through being transported, deposited, physically weathered and precipitated. [16] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Physical Properties==&lt;br /&gt;
The physical properties of soil include [[Soil Textures|texture]], [[Soil Structures|structure]], bulk density, consistency, temperature, porosity, color, and resistivity. [17] [[Soil Textures|Soil texture]] is determined by the mixture proportions of 3 soil mineral particles: sand, silt, and clay. At the next larger scale, [[soil structures]] called peds or more commonly soil [[Aggregate Formation|aggregates]] are created from the soil separates when iron oxides, carbonates, clay, silica and humus, coat particles and cause them to adhere into larger, relatively stable secondary structures. Bulk density is an estimate of soil compaction. Consistency is the ability for soil materials to stick to one another. Porosity is the empty space part of the soil volume which is occupied by water or gases. Temperature and color explain themselves. Resistivity has to do with the soils’ resistance to conduction of electric currents. Throughout the [[soil horizons]] these properties can vary. Soil aeration and water filtration ability can be determined from most of these properties. [18]&lt;br /&gt;
Influence of Soil Texture on Properties of Soils [19]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Property/behavior	&lt;br /&gt;
!Sand	&lt;br /&gt;
!Silt	&lt;br /&gt;
!Clay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Water-holding capacity	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Aeration	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Drainage rate&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow to medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Soil organic matter level	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High to medium &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Decomposition of organic matter	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
	|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Warm-up in spring	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Compactability	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to wind erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate (High if fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to water erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low if aggregated, otherwise high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Shrink/Swell Potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate to very high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Sealing of ponds, dams, and landfills	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Suitability for tillage after rain	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Pollutant leaching potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless cracked) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ability to store plant nutrients	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to High	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Resistance to pH change	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Voroney, R. Paul &amp;amp; Heck, Richard J. (2007). &amp;quot;The soil habitat&amp;quot;. In Paul, Eldor A. Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry (PDF) (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 25–49. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Taylor, Sterling A. &amp;amp; Ashcroft, Gaylen L. (1972). Physical edaphology: the physics of irrigated and nonirrigated soils. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. McCarthy, David F. (2006). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Gilluly, James; Waters, Aaron Clement &amp;amp; Woodford, Alfred Oswald (1975). Principles of geology (4th ed.). San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &amp;quot;Glossary of Terms in Soil Science&amp;quot;. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Amundson, Ronald. &amp;quot;Soil preservation and the future of pedology&amp;quot; (PDF). Faculty of Natural Resources. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. Simonson, Roy W. (1957). &amp;quot;What soils are&amp;quot;. The yearbook of agriculture 1957 (PDF) (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Davidson, Eric A. &amp;amp; Janssens, Ivan A. (2006). &amp;quot;Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change&amp;quot; (PDF). Nature. 440 (9 March 2006): 165‒73. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Torsvik, Vigdis &amp;amp; Øvreås, Lise (2002). &amp;quot;Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems&amp;quot; (PDF). Current Opinion in Microbiology. 5 (3): 240‒45. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7. &lt;br /&gt;
11. McClellan, Tai. &amp;quot;Soil composition&amp;quot;. University of Hawai‘i – College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. Retrieved 29 April 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. Buol, Stanley W.; Southard, Randal J.; Graham, Robert C. &amp;amp; McDaniel, Paul A. (2011). Soil genesis and classification (6th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. Bronick, Carol J. &amp;amp; Lal, Ratan (January 2005). &amp;quot;Soil structure and management: a review&amp;quot; (PDF). Geoderma. 124 (1/2): 3–22. Bibcode:2005Geode.124....3B. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. Bishop, Janice L.; Murchie, Scott L.; Pieters, Carlé L. &amp;amp; Zent, Aaron P. (2002). &amp;quot;A model for formation of dust, soil, and rock coatings on Mars: physical and chemical processes on the Martian surface&amp;quot; (PDF). Journal &lt;br /&gt;
of Geophysical Research. 107 (E11): 1–17. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5097B. doi:10.1029/2001JE001581&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. Donahue, Miller &amp;amp; Shickluna 1977, pp. 20–21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. Gardner, Catriona M.K.; Laryea, Kofi Buna &amp;amp; Unger, Paul W. (1999). Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production (PDF) (1st ed.). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19. Tamboli, Prabhakar Mahadeo (1961). The influence of bulk density and aggregate size on soil moisture retention (PDF). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20. Brady, Nyle C. (1984). The nature and properties of soils (9th ed.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
21. A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
22. http://soils.usda.gov/education/resources/lessons/profile/profile.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
23. See [[Jenny Equation]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2386</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2386"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T04:14:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a mixture of minerals, liquids, gases, organisms, and organic matter that when together can support life. The Earth’s soil is called the pedosphere, which has 4 main functions: it is a means of water storage, purification and supply; it is a medium for plant growth; it is habitat for organisms that modify the soil; it is a modifier of Earth’s atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
Things like the lithosphere, the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the hydrosphere interact with soil. In soil there is a solid phase of organic matter and minerals, as well as a water and gas holding porous phase [1,2,3]. Soils are sometimes treated as a 3-state system of solid, liquids, and gases [4]. &lt;br /&gt;
Soil is influenced by temporally interacting with factors of the equation S= f (cl, o, r, p, t, …) where S is soil formation, f is for a function of, cl is climate, o is organisms, r is relief (topography), p is parent material, and t is time. The ‘…’ was left just in case there were more factors that could be considered in the future [5]. Soil is continually being subjected to many chemical, physical, and biological processes. This includes weathering with erosion. [[File:Jenny.png|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
A characteristic of most soils is that they have a dry bulk density between 1.1 and 1.6 g/cm^3, but while also having a particle density that can go from 2.6 to 2.7 g/cm^3.&lt;br /&gt;
Soil science has two basic branches of study: edaphology and pedology. Edaphology is concerned with the influence of soils on living things. [6] Pedology is focused on the formation, description (morphology), and classification of soils in their natural environment. [7] In engineering terms, soil is included in the broader concept of regolith, which also includes other loose material that lies above the bedrock. [8] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Function==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a major component of the Earth&#039;s ecosystem. The world&#039;s ecosystems are impacted in far-reaching ways by the processes carried out in the soil, from ozone depletion and global warming, to rainforest destruction and water pollution. With respect to Earth&#039;s carbon cycle, soil is an important carbon reservoir, and it is potentially one of the most reactive to human disturbance and climate change. [9]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil can act as a habitat for [[soil organisms]], a regulator of water quality, an atmosphere composition modifier, an engineering medium, a recycling system for organic wastes and nutrients, and a medium of plant growth. This makes it a very import provider of ecosystem services. Since soil has a tremendous range of available niches and habitats, it contains most of the Earth&#039;s genetic diversity. A gram of soil can contain billions of organisms, belonging to thousands of species, mostly microbial and in the main still unexplored. [10] &lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil Horizons.gif|thumb|left|A basic diagram of the most common Master Horizons of a soil profile, with the E Horizon omitted]]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is typically 50% pores half/half occupied with water and gas, and solids like minerals or organic matter. [11] The pore space allows for the infiltration and movement of air and water, both of which are critical for life in soil. [12] Compaction creates problems for this.&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, soil will develop a soil profile which consists of multiple layers or [[soil horizons]] that differ in one or more properties ([[Soil Textures|texture]], structure, porosity, density, etc.). [13] They differ in thickness and don’t exhibit hard boundaries. The formation of these layers is reliant on the parent material, the modification processes of the parent materials, and soil forming factors that influence those processes. The biological influences on soil properties are strongest near the surface, while the geochemical influences on soil properties increase with depth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[soil texture]] is determined by the relative proportions of the individual particles of sand, silt, and clay that make up the soil. The interaction of the individual mineral particles with organic matter, water, gases via biotic and abiotic processes causes those particles to flocculate (stick together) to form aggregates or peds. [14] Where these [[Aggregate formation|aggregates]] can be identified, a soil can be said to be developed, and can be described further in terms of color, porosity, consistency, reaction (acidity), etc. [[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [9]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil formation, or [[[pedogenesis]], is a combination of the effects of chemical, biological, physical, and anthropogenic processes on soil parent material. Soil is formed when organic matter has accumulated and colloids are washed downward, leaving deposits of clay, humus, iron oxide, carbonate, and gypsum, producing a distinct layer called the B horizon. These constituents are moved from one level to another by water and animal activity. Resulting in the forming of layers. Movement of materials in the soil causes the forming of [[soil horizons]]. [15]&lt;br /&gt;
==Forming Factors==&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 factors that influence how soil is formed. Those being climate, organisms, relief (topography), parent material and time. These factors make up the soil formation equation S=f (cl, o, r, p, t).&lt;br /&gt;
===Parent Material===&lt;br /&gt;
Parent material is the mineral material that forms soil. Igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks are the source of mineral material within soils. The parent material is transformed into a soil through being transported, deposited, physically weathered and precipitated. [16] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Physical Properties==&lt;br /&gt;
The physical properties of soil include [[Soil Textures|texture]], [[Soil Structures|structure]], bulk density, consistency, temperature, porosity, color, and resistivity. [17] [[Soil Textures|Soil texture]] is determined by the mixture proportions of 3 soil mineral particles: sand, silt, and clay. At the next larger scale, [[soil structures]] called peds or more commonly soil [[Aggregate Formation|aggregates]] are created from the soil separates when iron oxides, carbonates, clay, silica and humus, coat particles and cause them to adhere into larger, relatively stable secondary structures. Bulk density is an estimate of soil compaction. Consistency is the ability for soil materials to stick to one another. Porosity is the empty space part of the soil volume which is occupied by water or gases. Temperature and color explain themselves. Resistivity has to do with the soils’ resistance to conduction of electric currents. Throughout the [[soil horizons]] these properties can vary. Soil aeration and water filtration ability can be determined from most of these properties. [18]&lt;br /&gt;
Influence of Soil Texture on Properties of Soils [19]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Property/behavior	&lt;br /&gt;
!Sand	&lt;br /&gt;
!Silt	&lt;br /&gt;
!Clay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Water-holding capacity	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Aeration	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Drainage rate&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow to medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Soil organic matter level	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High to medium &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Decomposition of organic matter	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium&lt;br /&gt;
	|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Warm-up in spring	&lt;br /&gt;
|Rapid	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Compactability	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to wind erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate (High if fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Susceptibility to water erosion	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless fine sand)	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low if aggregated, otherwise high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Shrink/Swell Potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Moderate to very high &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Sealing of ponds, dams, and landfills	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Suitability for tillage after rain	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Pollutant leaching potential	&lt;br /&gt;
|High	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low (unless cracked) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ability to store plant nutrients	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to High	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Resistance to pH change	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.Voroney, R. Paul &amp;amp; Heck, Richard J. (2007). &amp;quot;The soil habitat&amp;quot;. In Paul, Eldor A. Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry (PDF) (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 25–49. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.Taylor, Sterling A. &amp;amp; Ashcroft, Gaylen L. (1972). Physical edaphology: the physics of irrigated and nonirrigated soils. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.McCarthy, David F. (2006). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.Gilluly, James; Waters, Aaron Clement &amp;amp; Woodford, Alfred Oswald (1975). Principles of geology (4th ed.). San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.&amp;quot;Glossary of Terms in Soil Science&amp;quot;. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.Amundson, Ronald. &amp;quot;Soil preservation and the future of pedology&amp;quot; (PDF). Faculty of Natural Resources. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8.Simonson, Roy W. (1957). &amp;quot;What soils are&amp;quot;. The yearbook of agriculture 1957 (PDF) (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9.Davidson, Eric A. &amp;amp; Janssens, Ivan A. (2006). &amp;quot;Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change&amp;quot; (PDF). Nature. 440 (9 March 2006): 165‒73. Bibcode:2006Natur.440..165D. &lt;br /&gt;
  doi:10.1038/nature04514. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Torsvik, Vigdis &amp;amp; Øvreås, Lise (2002). &amp;quot;Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems&amp;quot; (PDF). Current Opinion in Microbiology. 5 (3): 240‒45. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7. Retrieved 17 &lt;br /&gt;
    December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11. McClellan, Tai. &amp;quot;Soil composition&amp;quot;. University of Hawai‘i – College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. Retrieved 29 April 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12.Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13.Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14.Buol, Stanley W.; Southard, Randal J.; Graham, Robert C. &amp;amp; McDaniel, Paul A. (2011). Soil genesis and classification (6th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15.Bronick, Carol J. &amp;amp; Lal, Ratan (January 2005). &amp;quot;Soil structure and management: a review&amp;quot; (PDF). Geoderma. 124 (1/2): 3–22. Bibcode:2005Geode.124....3B. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16.Bishop, Janice L.; Murchie, Scott L.; Pieters, Carlé L. &amp;amp; Zent, Aaron P. (2002). &amp;quot;A model for formation of dust, soil, and rock coatings on Mars: physical and chemical processes on the Martian surface&amp;quot; (PDF). Journal &lt;br /&gt;
of Geophysical Research. 107 (E11): 1–17. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5097B. doi:10.1029/2001JE001581&lt;br /&gt;
17.	Donahue, Miller &amp;amp; Shickluna 1977, pp. 20–21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18.Gardner, Catriona M.K.; Laryea, Kofi Buna &amp;amp; Unger, Paul W. (1999). Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production (PDF) (1st ed.). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19.Tamboli, Prabhakar Mahadeo (1961). The influence of bulk density and aggregate size on soil moisture retention (PDF). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.&lt;br /&gt;
20.Brady, Nyle C. (1984). The nature and properties of soils (9th ed.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2372</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2372"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:57:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a mixture of minerals, liquids, gases, organisms, and organic matter that when together can support life. The Earth’s soil is called the pedosphere, which has 4 main functions: it is a means of water storage, purification and supply; it is a medium for plant growth; it is habitat for organisms that modify the soil; it is a modifier of Earth’s atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
Things like the lithosphere, the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the hydrosphere interact with soil. In soil there is a solid phase of organic matter and minerals, as well as a water and gas holding porous phase [1,2,3]. Soils are sometimes treated as a 3-state system of solid, liquids, and gases [4]. &lt;br /&gt;
Soil is influenced by temporally interacting with factors of the equation S= f (cl, o, r, p, t, …) where S is soil formation, f is for a function of, cl is climate, o is organisms, r is relief (topography), p is parent material, and t is time. The ‘…’ was left just in case there were more factors that could be considered in the future [5]. Soil is continually being subjected to many chemical, physical, and biological processes. This includes weathering with erosion. [[File:Jenny.png|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
A characteristic of most soils is that they have a dry bulk density between 1.1 and 1.6 g/cm^3, but while also having a particle density that can go from 2.6 to 2.7 g/cm^3.&lt;br /&gt;
Soil science has two basic branches of study: edaphology and pedology. Edaphology is concerned with the influence of soils on living things. [6] Pedology is focused on the formation, description (morphology), and classification of soils in their natural environment. [7] In engineering terms, soil is included in the broader concept of regolith, which also includes other loose material that lies above the bedrock. [8] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Function==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a major component of the Earth&#039;s ecosystem. The world&#039;s ecosystems are impacted in far-reaching ways by the processes carried out in the soil, from ozone depletion and global warming, to rainforest destruction and water pollution. With respect to Earth&#039;s carbon cycle, soil is an important carbon reservoir, and it is potentially one of the most reactive to human disturbance and climate change. [9]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil can act as a habitat for [[soil organisms]], a regulator of water quality, an atmosphere composition modifier, an engineering medium, a recycling system for organic wastes and nutrients, and a medium of plant growth. This makes it a very import provider of ecosystem services. Since soil has a tremendous range of available niches and habitats, it contains most of the Earth&#039;s genetic diversity. A gram of soil can contain billions of organisms, belonging to thousands of species, mostly microbial and in the main still unexplored. [21] &lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is typically 50% pores half/half occupied with water and gas, and solids like minerals or organic matter. [32] The pore space allows for the infiltration and movement of air and water, both of which are critical for life in soil. [34] Compaction creates problems for this.&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, soil will develop a soil profile which consists of multiple layers or [[soil horizons]] that differ in one or more properties ([[Soil Textures|texture]], structure, porosity, density, etc.). [9] They differ in thickness and don’t exhibit hard boundaries. The formation of these layers is reliant on the parent material, the modification processes of the parent materials, and soil forming factors that influence those processes. The biological influences on soil properties are strongest near the surface, while the geochemical influences on soil properties increase with depth. [[File:Soil Horizons.gif|thumb|A basic diagram of the most common Master Horizons of a soil profile, with the E Horizon omitted]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[soil texture]] is determined by the relative proportions of the individual particles of sand, silt, and clay that make up the soil. The interaction of the individual mineral particles with organic matter, water, gases via biotic and abiotic processes causes those particles to flocculate (stick together) to form aggregates or peds. [37] Where these [[Aggregate formation|aggregates]] can be identified, a soil can be said to be developed, and can be described further in terms of color, porosity, consistency, reaction (acidity), etc. [[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [9]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil formation, or [[[pedogenesis]], is a combination of the effects of chemical, biological, physical, and anthropogenic processes on soil parent material. Soil is formed when organic matter has accumulated and colloids are washed downward, leaving deposits of clay, humus, iron oxide, carbonate, and gypsum, producing a distinct layer called the B horizon. These constituents are moved from one level to another by water and animal activity. Resulting in the forming of layers. Movement of materials in the soil causes the forming of [[soil horizons]]. [70]&lt;br /&gt;
==Forming Factors==&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 factors that influence how soil is formed. Those being climate, organisms, relief (topography), parent material and time. These factors make up the soil formation equation S=f (cl, o, r, p, t).&lt;br /&gt;
===Parent Material===&lt;br /&gt;
Parent material is the mineral material that forms soil. Igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks are the source of mineral material within soils. The parent material is transformed into a soil through being transported, deposited, physically weathered and precipitated. [78] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Physical Properties==&lt;br /&gt;
The physical properties of soil include [[Soil Textures|texture]], [[Soil Structures|structure]], bulk density, consistency, temperature, porosity, color, and resistivity. [167] [[Soil Textures|Soil texture]] is determined by the mixture proportions of 3 soil mineral particles: sand, silt, and clay. At the next larger scale, [[soil structures]] called peds or more commonly soil [[Aggregate Formation|aggregates]] are created from the soil separates when iron oxides, carbonates, clay, silica and humus, coat particles and cause them to adhere into larger, relatively stable secondary structures. Bulk density is an estimate of soil compaction. Consistency is the ability for soil materials to stick to one another. Porosity is the empty space part of the soil volume which is occupied by water or gases. Temperature and color explain themselves. Resistivity has to do with the soils’ resistance to conduction of electric currents. Throughout the [[soil horizons]] these properties can vary. Soil aeration and water filtration ability can be determined from most of these properties. [172]&lt;br /&gt;
Influence of Soil Texture on Properties of Soils [54]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Property/behavior	&lt;br /&gt;
!Sand	&lt;br /&gt;
!Silt	!Clay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Water-holding capacity	&lt;br /&gt;
|Low	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium to high	&lt;br /&gt;
|High &lt;br /&gt;
-|&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|Aeration	&lt;br /&gt;
|Good	&lt;br /&gt;
|Medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor&lt;br /&gt;
-|&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Drainage rate&lt;br /&gt;
|High&lt;br /&gt;
|Slow to medium	&lt;br /&gt;
|Very slow &lt;br /&gt;
-|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Soil organic matter level	|Low	|Medium to high	|High to medium -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Decomposition of organic matter	|Rapid	|Medium	|Slow -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Warm-up in spring	|Rapid	|Moderate	|Slow -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Compactability	|Low	|Medium	|High -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Susceptibility to wind erosion	|Moderate (High if fine sand)	|High	|Low -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Susceptibility to water erosion	|Low (unless fine sand)	|High	|Low if aggregated, otherwise high -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Shrink/Swell Potential	|Very Low	|Low	|Moderate to very high -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Sealing of ponds, dams, and landfills	|Poor	|Poor	|Good -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Suitability for tillage after rain	|Good	|Medium	|Poor -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Pollutant leaching potential	|High	|Medium	|Low (unless cracked) -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Ability to store plant nutrients	|Poor	|Medium to High	|High -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Resistance to pH change	|Low	|Medium	|High -|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Voroney, R. Paul &amp;amp; Heck, Richard J. (2007). &amp;quot;The soil habitat&amp;quot;. In Paul, Eldor A. Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry (PDF) (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 25–49. &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	Taylor, Sterling A. &amp;amp; Ashcroft, Gaylen L. (1972). Physical edaphology: the physics of irrigated and nonirrigated soils. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	 McCarthy, David F. (2006). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. &lt;br /&gt;
5.	Gilluly, James; Waters, Aaron Clement &amp;amp; Woodford, Alfred Oswald (1975). Principles of geology (4th ed.). San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
6.	 &amp;quot;Glossary of Terms in Soil Science&amp;quot;. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
7.	Amundson, Ronald. &amp;quot;Soil preservation and the future of pedology&amp;quot; (PDF). Faculty of Natural Resources. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
8.	Simonson, Roy W. (1957). &amp;quot;What soils are&amp;quot;. The yearbook of agriculture 1957 (PDF) (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. &lt;br /&gt;
9.	 Davidson, Eric A. &amp;amp; Janssens, Ivan A. (2006). &amp;quot;Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change&amp;quot; (PDF). Nature. 440 (9 March 2006): 165‒73. Bibcode:2006Natur.440..165D. doi:10.1038/nature04514. PMID 16525463.&lt;br /&gt;
10.	 Torsvik, Vigdis &amp;amp; Øvreås, Lise (2002). &amp;quot;Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems&amp;quot; (PDF). Current Opinion in Microbiology. 5 (3): 240‒45. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
11.	McClellan, Tai. &amp;quot;Soil composition&amp;quot;. University of Hawai‘i – College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. Retrieved 29 April 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
12.	Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
13.	Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
14.	Buol, Stanley W.; Southard, Randal J.; Graham, Robert C. &amp;amp; McDaniel, Paul A. (2011). Soil genesis and classification (6th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0470960608.&lt;br /&gt;
15.	Bronick, Carol J. &amp;amp; Lal, Ratan (January 2005). &amp;quot;Soil structure and management: a review&amp;quot; (PDF). Geoderma. 124 (1/2): 3–22. Bibcode:2005Geode.124....3B. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.&lt;br /&gt;
16.	Bishop, Janice L.; Murchie, Scott L.; Pieters, Carlé L. &amp;amp; Zent, Aaron P. (2002). &amp;quot;A model for formation of dust, soil, and rock coatings on Mars: physical and chemical processes on the Martian surface&amp;quot; (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research. 107 (E11): 1–17. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5097B. doi:10.1029/2001JE001581&lt;br /&gt;
17.	Donahue, Miller &amp;amp; Shickluna 1977, pp. 20–21.&lt;br /&gt;
18.	Gardner, Catriona M.K.; Laryea, Kofi Buna &amp;amp; Unger, Paul W. (1999). Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production (PDF) (1st ed.). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
19.	Tamboli, Prabhakar Mahadeo (1961). The influence of bulk density and aggregate size on soil moisture retention (PDF). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.&lt;br /&gt;
20.	Brady, Nyle C. (1984). The nature and properties of soils (9th ed.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2365</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2365"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:55:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a mixture of minerals, liquids, gases, organisms, and organic matter that when together can support life. The Earth’s soil is called the pedosphere, which has 4 main functions: it is a means of water storage, purification and supply; it is a medium for plant growth; it is habitat for organisms that modify the soil; it is a modifier of Earth’s atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
Things like the lithosphere, the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the hydrosphere interact with soil. In soil there is a solid phase of organic matter and minerals, as well as a water and gas holding porous phase [1,2,3]. Soils are sometimes treated as a 3-state system of solid, liquids, and gases [4]. &lt;br /&gt;
Soil is influenced by temporally interacting with factors of the equation S= f (cl, o, r, p, t, …) where S is soil formation, f is for a function of, cl is climate, o is organisms, r is relief (topography), p is parent material, and t is time. The ‘…’ was left just in case there were more factors that could be considered in the future [5]. Soil is continually being subjected to many chemical, physical, and biological processes. This includes weathering with erosion. [[File:Jenny.png|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
A characteristic of most soils is that they have a dry bulk density between 1.1 and 1.6 g/cm^3, but while also having a particle density that can go from 2.6 to 2.7 g/cm^3.&lt;br /&gt;
Soil science has two basic branches of study: edaphology and pedology. Edaphology is concerned with the influence of soils on living things. [6] Pedology is focused on the formation, description (morphology), and classification of soils in their natural environment. [7] In engineering terms, soil is included in the broader concept of regolith, which also includes other loose material that lies above the bedrock. [8] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Function==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is a major component of the Earth&#039;s ecosystem. The world&#039;s ecosystems are impacted in far-reaching ways by the processes carried out in the soil, from ozone depletion and global warming, to rainforest destruction and water pollution. With respect to Earth&#039;s carbon cycle, soil is an important carbon reservoir, and it is potentially one of the most reactive to human disturbance and climate change. [9]&lt;br /&gt;
Soil can act as a habitat for [[soil organisms]], a regulator of water quality, an atmosphere composition modifier, an engineering medium, a recycling system for organic wastes and nutrients, and a medium of plant growth. This makes it a very import provider of ecosystem services. Since soil has a tremendous range of available niches and habitats, it contains most of the Earth&#039;s genetic diversity. A gram of soil can contain billions of organisms, belonging to thousands of species, mostly microbial and in the main still unexplored. [21] &lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil is typically 50% pores half/half occupied with water and gas, and solids like minerals or organic matter. [32] The pore space allows for the infiltration and movement of air and water, both of which are critical for life in soil. [34] Compaction creates problems for this.&lt;br /&gt;
Over time, soil will develop a soil profile which consists of multiple layers or [[soil horizons]] that differ in one or more properties ([[Soil Textures|texture]], structure, porosity, density, etc.). [9] They differ in thickness and don’t exhibit hard boundaries. The formation of these layers is reliant on the parent material, the modification processes of the parent materials, and soil forming factors that influence those processes. The biological influences on soil properties are strongest near the surface, while the geochemical influences on soil properties increase with depth. [[File:Soil Horizons.gif|thumb|A basic diagram of the most common Master Horizons of a soil profile, with the E Horizon omitted]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[soil texture]] is determined by the relative proportions of the individual particles of sand, silt, and clay that make up the soil. The interaction of the individual mineral particles with organic matter, water, gases via biotic and abiotic processes causes those particles to flocculate (stick together) to form aggregates or peds. [37] Where these [[Aggregate formation|aggregates]] can be identified, a soil can be said to be developed, and can be described further in terms of color, porosity, consistency, reaction (acidity), etc. [[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [9]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation==&lt;br /&gt;
Soil formation, or [[[pedogenesis]], is a combination of the effects of chemical, biological, physical, and anthropogenic processes on soil parent material. Soil is formed when organic matter has accumulated and colloids are washed downward, leaving deposits of clay, humus, iron oxide, carbonate, and gypsum, producing a distinct layer called the B horizon. These constituents are moved from one level to another by water and animal activity. Resulting in the forming of layers. Movement of materials in the soil causes the forming of [[soil horizons]]. [70]&lt;br /&gt;
==Forming Factors==&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 factors that influence how soil is formed. Those being climate, organisms, relief (topography), parent material and time. These factors make up the soil formation equation S=f (cl, o, r, p, t).&lt;br /&gt;
===Parent Material===&lt;br /&gt;
Parent material is the mineral material that forms soil. Igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks are the source of mineral material within soils. The parent material is transformed into a soil through being transported, deposited, physically weathered and precipitated. [78] &lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Physical Properties==&lt;br /&gt;
The physical properties of soil include [[Soil Textures|texture]], [[Soil Structures|structure]], bulk density, consistency, temperature, porosity, color, and resistivity. [167] [[Soil Textures|Soil texture]] is determined by the mixture proportions of 3 soil mineral particles: sand, silt, and clay. At the next larger scale, [[soil structures]] called peds or more commonly soil [[Aggregate Formation|aggregates]] are created from the soil separates when iron oxides, carbonates, clay, silica and humus, coat particles and cause them to adhere into larger, relatively stable secondary structures. Bulk density is an estimate of soil compaction. Consistency is the ability for soil materials to stick to one another. Porosity is the empty space part of the soil volume which is occupied by water or gases. Temperature and color explain themselves. Resistivity has to do with the soils’ resistance to conduction of electric currents. Throughout the [[soil horizons]] these properties can vary. Soil aeration and water filtration ability can be determined from most of these properties. [172]&lt;br /&gt;
Influence of Soil Texture on Properties of Soils [54]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Property/behavior	&lt;br /&gt;
!Sand	&lt;br /&gt;
!Silt	!Clay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Water-holding capacity	|Low	|Medium to high	|High -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Aeration	|Good	|Medium	|Poor -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Drainage rate	|High	|Slow to medium	|Very slow -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Soil organic matter level	|Low	|Medium to high	|High to medium -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Decomposition of organic matter	|Rapid	|Medium	|Slow -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Warm-up in spring	|Rapid	|Moderate	|Slow -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Compactability	|Low	|Medium	|High -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Susceptibility to wind erosion	|Moderate (High if fine sand)	|High	|Low -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Susceptibility to water erosion	|Low (unless fine sand)	|High	|Low if aggregated, otherwise high -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Shrink/Swell Potential	|Very Low	|Low	|Moderate to very high -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Sealing of ponds, dams, and landfills	|Poor	|Poor	|Good -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Suitability for tillage after rain	|Good	|Medium	|Poor -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Pollutant leaching potential	|High	|Medium	|Low (unless cracked) -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Ability to store plant nutrients	|Poor	|Medium to High	|High -|&lt;br /&gt;
|- |Resistance to pH change	|Low	|Medium	|High -|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Voroney, R. Paul &amp;amp; Heck, Richard J. (2007). &amp;quot;The soil habitat&amp;quot;. In Paul, Eldor A. Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry (PDF) (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 25–49. &lt;br /&gt;
2.	Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. &lt;br /&gt;
3.	Taylor, Sterling A. &amp;amp; Ashcroft, Gaylen L. (1972). Physical edaphology: the physics of irrigated and nonirrigated soils. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
4.	 McCarthy, David F. (2006). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. &lt;br /&gt;
5.	Gilluly, James; Waters, Aaron Clement &amp;amp; Woodford, Alfred Oswald (1975). Principles of geology (4th ed.). San Francisco, California: W.H. Freeman. &lt;br /&gt;
6.	 &amp;quot;Glossary of Terms in Soil Science&amp;quot;. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
7.	Amundson, Ronald. &amp;quot;Soil preservation and the future of pedology&amp;quot; (PDF). Faculty of Natural Resources. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
8.	Simonson, Roy W. (1957). &amp;quot;What soils are&amp;quot;. The yearbook of agriculture 1957 (PDF) (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. &lt;br /&gt;
9.	 Davidson, Eric A. &amp;amp; Janssens, Ivan A. (2006). &amp;quot;Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change&amp;quot; (PDF). Nature. 440 (9 March 2006): 165‒73. Bibcode:2006Natur.440..165D. doi:10.1038/nature04514. PMID 16525463.&lt;br /&gt;
10.	 Torsvik, Vigdis &amp;amp; Øvreås, Lise (2002). &amp;quot;Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems&amp;quot; (PDF). Current Opinion in Microbiology. 5 (3): 240‒45. doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
11.	McClellan, Tai. &amp;quot;Soil composition&amp;quot;. University of Hawai‘i – College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. Retrieved 29 April 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
12.	Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
13.	Vannier, Guy (1987). &amp;quot;The porosphere as an ecological medium emphasized in Professor Ghilarov&#039;s work on soil animal adaptations&amp;quot;. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 3 (1): 39–44. doi:10.1007/BF00260577.&lt;br /&gt;
14.	Buol, Stanley W.; Southard, Randal J.; Graham, Robert C. &amp;amp; McDaniel, Paul A. (2011). Soil genesis and classification (6th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0470960608.&lt;br /&gt;
15.	Bronick, Carol J. &amp;amp; Lal, Ratan (January 2005). &amp;quot;Soil structure and management: a review&amp;quot; (PDF). Geoderma. 124 (1/2): 3–22. Bibcode:2005Geode.124....3B. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.&lt;br /&gt;
16.	Bishop, Janice L.; Murchie, Scott L.; Pieters, Carlé L. &amp;amp; Zent, Aaron P. (2002). &amp;quot;A model for formation of dust, soil, and rock coatings on Mars: physical and chemical processes on the Martian surface&amp;quot; (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research. 107 (E11): 1–17. Bibcode:2002JGRE..107.5097B. doi:10.1029/2001JE001581&lt;br /&gt;
17.	Donahue, Miller &amp;amp; Shickluna 1977, pp. 20–21.&lt;br /&gt;
18.	Gardner, Catriona M.K.; Laryea, Kofi Buna &amp;amp; Unger, Paul W. (1999). Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production (PDF) (1st ed.). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
19.	Tamboli, Prabhakar Mahadeo (1961). The influence of bulk density and aggregate size on soil moisture retention (PDF). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.&lt;br /&gt;
20.	Brady, Nyle C. (1984). The nature and properties of soils (9th ed.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2350</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2350"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:39:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Soil is the uppermost layer of the earth&#039;s crust and is comprised of minerals, organic matter, gases, liquids, and organisms. Soil forms the pedosphere which interacts with the atmosphere, lithosphere, and hydrosphere. [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation of soil==&lt;br /&gt;
Pedogenesis is the term for the formation of soil from parent material through a few different stages. These stages are best summarized through the use of the [[Jenny Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Functions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types and classification of soil==&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;You do know that I chose Soil as my third topic right? Matt B&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Chesworth, Ward (2008). Encyclopedia of soil science (PDF). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. ISBN 978-1402039942.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Jenny, Hans (1941). Factors of soil formation: a system of quantitative pedology (PDF). New York, New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2348</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2348"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:38:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Soil is the uppermost layer of the earth&#039;s crust and is comprised of minerals, organic matter, gases, liquids, and organisms. Soil forms the pedosphere which interacts with the atmosphere, lithosphere, and hydrosphere. [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation of soil==&lt;br /&gt;
Pedogenesis is the term for the formation of soil from parent material through a few different stages. These stages are best summarized through the use of the [[Jenny Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Functions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types and classification of soil==&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Dude, you do know that I chose Soil as my third topic right? Matt B&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Chesworth, Ward (2008). Encyclopedia of soil science (PDF). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. ISBN 978-1402039942.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Jenny, Hans (1941). Factors of soil formation: a system of quantitative pedology (PDF). New York, New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2347</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2347"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:38:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Soil is the uppermost layer of the earth&#039;s crust and is comprised of minerals, organic matter, gases, liquids, and organisms. Soil forms the pedosphere which interacts with the atmosphere, lithosphere, and hydrosphere. [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation of soil==&lt;br /&gt;
Pedogenesis is the term for the formation of soil from parent material through a few different stages. These stages are best summarized through the use of the [[Jenny Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Functions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types and classification of soil==&lt;br /&gt;
==Dude, you do know that I chose Soil as my third topic right? Matt B==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Chesworth, Ward (2008). Encyclopedia of soil science (PDF). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. ISBN 978-1402039942.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Jenny, Hans (1941). Factors of soil formation: a system of quantitative pedology (PDF). New York, New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2346</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2346"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:37:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Soil is the uppermost layer of the earth&#039;s crust and is comprised of minerals, organic matter, gases, liquids, and organisms. Soil forms the pedosphere which interacts with the atmosphere, lithosphere, and hydrosphere. [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation of soil==&lt;br /&gt;
Pedogenesis is the term for the formation of soil from parent material through a few different stages. These stages are best summarized through the use of the [[Jenny Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Functions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types and classification of soil==&lt;br /&gt;
==Dude, you do know that I chose Soil as my third topic right?&lt;br /&gt;
-Matt B==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Chesworth, Ward (2008). Encyclopedia of soil science (PDF). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. ISBN 978-1402039942.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Jenny, Hans (1941). Factors of soil formation: a system of quantitative pedology (PDF). New York, New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2344</id>
		<title>Soil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil&amp;diff=2344"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:37:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Soil is the uppermost layer of the earth&#039;s crust and is comprised of minerals, organic matter, gases, liquids, and organisms. Soil forms the pedosphere which interacts with the atmosphere, lithosphere, and hydrosphere. [2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Formation of soil==&lt;br /&gt;
Pedogenesis is the term for the formation of soil from parent material through a few different stages. These stages are best summarized through the use of the [[Jenny Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Soil Functions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types and classification of soil==&lt;br /&gt;
=Dude, you do know that I chose Soil as my third topic right?&lt;br /&gt;
-Matt B=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Danoff-Burg, James A. &amp;quot;The terrestrial influence: geology and soils&amp;quot;. Earth Institute Center for Environmental Sustainability. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Chesworth, Ward (2008). Encyclopedia of soil science (PDF). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. ISBN 978-1402039942.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Jenny, Hans (1941). Factors of soil formation: a system of quantitative pedology (PDF). New York, New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved 17 December 2017.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Periodical_Cicadas&amp;diff=1521</id>
		<title>Periodical Cicadas</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Periodical_Cicadas&amp;diff=1521"/>
		<updated>2018-04-19T22:28:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Periodical Cicadas==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:cicada.jpg|280px|thumb|right|Periodical Cicada [18]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Periodical cicadas of eastern Northern America fall within the genus Magicicada. This 13-year and 17-year species are often referred to as “locusts” which is incorrect. Cicadas fall into the order Hemiptera while locusts fall into the order Orthoptera like grasshoppers [1].&lt;br /&gt;
The 13 and 17-year lives of cicadas is spent primarily underground where they consume the xylem from the roots of eastern U.S. deciduous trees [2]. Mature cicada nymphs crawl up to the surface and emerge in the springtime after 13 or 17 years at any location, simultaneously in massive numbers. These mature adults are only active for about 4 to 6 weeks after emergence [3]. To attract mates, males conglomerate into a noisy chorus. This lifecycle is finished after about 2 months of the initial emergence, where at this point the adult cicadas are absent for another 13 or 17-year period and the eggs have been laid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
The periodical cicada has a black dorsal thorax, red eyes, and translucent wings with orange veins. Depending on the species, the abdomen underside can be black, orange, or striped with orange and black [4].&lt;br /&gt;
Adults are usually 2.4 to 3.3 cm, which is a little smaller than most annual cicada species found in the same location of the United States. Females are larger than males at maturity [5]. &lt;br /&gt;
Males of the Magicicada attract females by forming large aggregations that “sing” in a chorus. This chorus typically sounds like loud buzzing, ticking, or both. The characteristics of these chorus “songs” vary depending on the species [6].&lt;br /&gt;
Cicadas are not known for biting or stinging. They have mouthparts that are used to pierce plants and suck their sap like other Auchenorrhyncha bugs. The only way a cicada can be harmful is that when being handled their proboscis can painfully pierce human skin. There is no evidence that they transmit disease and are venomous. Mature vegetation experience little threat from periodical cicadas, but planting new trees and shrubs is better to be pushed off until after their expected emergence. Twig die-off or flagging can result from egg-laying [7]. To prevent damage to young trees or shrubs during the egg-laying period, which starts a week after emergence of the first adult and lasts until females have died, they can be covered with cheesecloth or another similar material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lifecycle==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:cycle.png|150px|thumb|right|Transformation of the periodical cicada from the mature nymph to the adult [19]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:molting.jpg|150px|thumb|left|Molting Cicada [20]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:finalmolt.jpg|150px|thumb|left|Cicada in final molting stage [21]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:eggslits.jpg|150px|thumb|right|Cicada egg slits [22]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every cicada spends many years as a juvenile underground, but then emerges above ground for a small adult period that can last several weeks to a few months. All the adults of the 7 periodical cicada species emerge in any one location all at once in the same year, in a synchronized fashion. Their lifecycle of periodicity are a very long 13 to 17 years. Annual cicadas are not synchronized; some adults mature every summer while the rest of the population develops underground.&lt;br /&gt;
During the juvenile stage periodical cicada nymphs live underground within 2 ft of the surface and feed on plant root juices [8]. These nymphs in their underground development undergo 5 instar stages (arthropod developmental stages). The difference in the 13 and 17-year lifecycle is the time taken for the maturity of the second instar. As the nymphs feed they move deeper below ground to get to larger roots during their time underground [9].&lt;br /&gt;
Nymphs emerge when the soil temperature at about 20 cm deep is above 17.9 °C in the spring. The time of the emergence varies depending on location. In the far south the emergence occurs in late April or early May, in the far north they emerge late May to early June. When they emerge, nymphs move to complete their transformation into adults by climbing to a suitable place on nearby vegetation. After their final molt, they spend 6 days in the trees waiting for the hardening of their exoskeletons to complete. &lt;br /&gt;
As adults, periodical cicadas only live for a few weeks; having disappeared by mid-July. Their adult lives are short lived, with the singular purpose of reproduction. Using their tymbals, males “sing” a species-specific mating song. When males “sing” they usually aggregate together which is typically sexually attractive to females. These males alternate singing and short flights from tree to tree to find females [10].&lt;br /&gt;
Receptive females respond to these males with timed wing-flicks that attract them for mating [11]. The sound created by a chorus can reach a deafening 100 decibels. Other than their calling song, when approaching an individual female males produce a courtship song that is distinctive [4].&lt;br /&gt;
Mating can happen multiple times for both male and females, but females mostly mate just once. The female after mating cuts V-shaped slits in bark of young twigs and lays around 20 eggs in each slit. Totaling of around 600 or more eggs. The eggs hatch into newborn nymphs that drop to the ground after about 6 to 10 weeks, where they then burrow into the ground to start another 13 or 17-year cycle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Survival Strategy==&lt;br /&gt;
===Predator Satiation=== &lt;br /&gt;
Cicada nymphs emerge synchronously in large numbers, more than 1.5 million individuals per acre sometimes [12]. This large emergence is a survival trait called predator satiation. Early after their emergence, the periodical cicadas are easy prey for birds, reptiles, cats, and other small and large mammals [3]. The overall survival mechanism of the cicadas is just to simply overwhelm predators with their large numbers, allowing for most individuals to survive. Their large period before emergence is most likely a predator avoidance strategy. This being adopted to eliminate the possibility of predators having periodic population boosts that would be synchronized with the cicada emergence [13]. Another view of why their developmental period is so long is to prevent hybridization between broods of differing cycles. This adaptation most likely resulted from cycles during a period of heavy selection pressure that were brought on by lowered and isolated populations [14].&lt;br /&gt;
Cicada population cycles are momentous enough to affect other animals and plants. Tree growth has been observed to decrease the year before the emergence of a cicada brood, due to the increased eating by nymphs on roots [15]. The mole uses them as a food source and has shown to do well the year before an emergence, but do poorly the following year due to the reduced source of food [16]. The carcasses that are uneaten decompose on the ground providing nutrients to the soil [15]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Distribution==&lt;br /&gt;
The 17-year cicadas are found across the eastern, upper Midwestern, and Great Plains states of the U.S., but with some overlap the 13-year cicadas are found in the southern and Mississippi Valley States. Efforts are currently underway to generate new distribution maps of all periodical cicada broods. This effort makes use of crowdsourced records and records collected by entomologists [17].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]&amp;quot;Periodical Cicada&amp;quot;. magicicada.org.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Lloyd, M. &amp;amp; H.S. Dybas (1966). &amp;quot;The periodical cicada problem. I. Population ecology&amp;quot;. Evolution. 20 (2): 133–149. doi:10.2307/2406568. JSTOR 2406568.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Williams, K.S. &amp;amp; C. Simon (1995). &amp;quot;The ecology, behavior, and evolution of periodical cicadas&amp;quot; (PDF). Annual Review of Entomology. 40: 269–295. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.001413.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Alexander, Richard D.; Moore, Thomas E. (1962). &amp;quot;The Evolutionary Relationships of 17-Year and 13-Year Cicadas, and Three New Species (Homoptera, Cicadidae,Magicicada)&amp;quot; (PDF). University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. Retrieved 9 June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Capinera, John L. (2008). Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer. pp. 2785–2794. ISBN 1-4020-6242-7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] Stranahan, Nancy. &amp;quot;Nature Notes from the Eastern Forest&amp;quot;. Arc of Appalachia. Archived from the originalon 5 October 2011. Retrieved 10 June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] Cook, William M.; Robert D. Holt (2002). &amp;quot;Periodical cicada (Magicicada cassini) oviposition damage: visually impressive yet dynamically irrelevant&amp;quot; (PDF). American Midland Naturalist. 147 (2): 214–224. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2002)147[0214:PCMCOD]2.0.CO;2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 August 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Marlatt, C. L. (1907). The Periodical Cicada (Bulletin No. 71 - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. pp. 123–125.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9] White, J; Lloyd, M. (1979). &amp;quot;Seventeen year cicadas emerging after eighteen years-a new brood?&amp;quot;. Evolution. 33: 1193–1199. doi:10.2307/2407477.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10] &amp;quot;Magicicada Broods III and XXII will emerge in 2014&amp;quot;. www.magicicada.org.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[11] &amp;quot;Sexual Signals in Periodical Cicadas&amp;quot; (PDF). Behaviour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[12] Dybas, H. S.; Davis, D. D. (1962). &amp;quot;A populations census of seventeen-year periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada)&amp;quot;. Ecology. 43 (3): 432–444. doi:10.2307/1933372. JSTOR 1933372.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[13] Goles, E.; Schulz, O.; Markus, M. (2001). &amp;quot;Prime number selection of cycles in a predator-prey model&amp;quot;. Complexity. 6 (4): 33–38. doi:10.1002/cplx.1040.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[14] Cox, R. T. &amp;amp; C. E. Carlton (1988). &amp;quot;Paleoclimatic influences in the evolution of periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada spp.)&amp;quot;. American Midland Naturalist. 120 (1): 183–193. doi:10.2307/2425898. JSTOR 2425898.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[15] Yang, Louie H. (2004). &amp;quot;Periodical cicadas as resource pulses in North American forests&amp;quot;. Science. 306(5701): 1565–1567. Bibcode:2004Sci...306.1565Y. doi:10.1126/science.1103114. PMID 15567865.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[16] National Geographic: Cicada Outbreaks Linked to Other Animals&#039; Booms, Busts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[17] http://www.magicicada.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[18] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWr8fzUz-Yw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[19] &#039;&#039;Insects, their way and means of living&#039;&#039;, R. E. Snodgrass. http://www.archive.org/details/39088001578236&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[20] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cicada_Molting.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[21] http://bugoftheweek.com/blog/2013/6/10/egg-laying-in-the-treetops-imagicicadai-brood-ii&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[22] http://plotfiftyfive.blogspot.com/2016/05/magicicada.html&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Periodical_Cicadas&amp;diff=1518</id>
		<title>Periodical Cicadas</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Periodical_Cicadas&amp;diff=1518"/>
		<updated>2018-04-19T22:22:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Periodical Cicadas==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:cicada.jpg|280px|thumb|right|Periodical Cicada]]&lt;br /&gt;
Periodical cicadas of eastern Northern America fall within the genus Magicicada. This 13-year and 17-year species are often referred to as “locusts” which is incorrect. Cicadas fall into the order Hemiptera while locusts fall into the order Orthoptera like grasshoppers [1].&lt;br /&gt;
The 13 and 17-year lives of cicadas is spent primarily underground where they consume the xylem from the roots of eastern U.S. deciduous trees [2]. Mature cicada nymphs crawl up to the surface and emerge in the springtime after 13 or 17 years at any location, simultaneously in massive numbers. These mature adults are only active for about 4 to 6 weeks after emergence [3]. To attract mates, males conglomerate into a noisy chorus. This lifecycle is finished after about 2 months of the initial emergence, where at this point the adult cicadas are absent for another 13 or 17-year period and the eggs have been laid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
The periodical cicada has a black dorsal thorax, red eyes, and translucent wings with orange veins. Depending on the species, the abdomen underside can be black, orange, or striped with orange and black [4].&lt;br /&gt;
Adults are usually 2.4 to 3.3 cm, which is a little smaller than most annual cicada species found in the same location of the United States. Females are larger than males at maturity [5]. &lt;br /&gt;
Males of the Magicicada attract females by forming large aggregations that “sing” in a chorus. This chorus typically sounds like loud buzzing, ticking, or both. The characteristics of these chorus “songs” vary depending on the species [6].&lt;br /&gt;
Cicadas are not known for biting or stinging. They have mouthparts that are used to pierce plants and suck their sap like other Auchenorrhyncha bugs. The only way a cicada can be harmful is that when being handled their proboscis can painfully pierce human skin. There is no evidence that they transmit disease and are venomous. Mature vegetation experience little threat from periodical cicadas, but planting new trees and shrubs is better to be pushed off until after their expected emergence. Twig die-off or flagging can result from egg-laying [7]. To prevent damage to young trees or shrubs during the egg-laying period, which starts a week after emergence of the first adult and lasts until females have died, they can be covered with cheesecloth or another similar material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lifecycle==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:cycle.png|150px|thumb|right|Transformation of the periodical cicada from the mature nymph to the adult]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:molting.jpg|150px|thumb|left|Molting Cicada]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:finalmolt.jpg|150px|thumb|left|Cicada in final molting stage]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:eggslits.jpg|150px|thumb|right|Cicada egg slits]]&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every cicada spends many years as a juvenile underground, but then emerges above ground for a small adult period that can last several weeks to a few months. All the adults of the 7 periodical cicada species emerge in any one location all at once in the same year, in a synchronized fashion. Their lifecycle of periodicity are a very long 13 to 17 years. Annual cicadas are not synchronized; some adults mature every summer while the rest of the population develops underground.&lt;br /&gt;
During the juvenile stage periodical cicada nymphs live underground within 2 ft of the surface and feed on plant root juices [8]. These nymphs in their underground development undergo 5 instar stages (arthropod developmental stages). The difference in the 13 and 17-year lifecycle is the time taken for the maturity of the second instar. As the nymphs feed they move deeper below ground to get to larger roots during their time underground [9].&lt;br /&gt;
Nymphs emerge when the soil temperature at about 20 cm deep is above 17.9 °C in the spring. The time of the emergence varies depending on location. In the far south the emergence occurs in late April or early May, in the far north they emerge late May to early June. When they emerge, nymphs move to complete their transformation into adults by climbing to a suitable place on nearby vegetation. After their final molt, they spend 6 days in the trees waiting for the hardening of their exoskeletons to complete. &lt;br /&gt;
As adults, periodical cicadas only live for a few weeks; having disappeared by mid-July. Their adult lives are short lived, with the singular purpose of reproduction. Using their tymbals, males “sing” a species-specific mating song. When males “sing” they usually aggregate together which is typically sexually attractive to females. These males alternate singing and short flights from tree to tree to find females [10].&lt;br /&gt;
Receptive females respond to these males with timed wing-flicks that attract them for mating [11]. The sound created by a chorus can reach a deafening 100 decibels. Other than their calling song, when approaching an individual female males produce a courtship song that is distinctive [4].&lt;br /&gt;
Mating can happen multiple times for both male and females, but females mostly mate just once. The female after mating cuts V-shaped slits in bark of young twigs and lays around 20 eggs in each slit. Totaling of around 600 or more eggs. The eggs hatch into newborn nymphs that drop to the ground after about 6 to 10 weeks, where they then burrow into the ground to start another 13 or 17-year cycle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Survival Strategy==&lt;br /&gt;
===Predator Satiation=== &lt;br /&gt;
Cicada nymphs emerge synchronously in large numbers, more than 1.5 million individuals per acre sometimes [12]. This large emergence is a survival trait called predator satiation. Early after their emergence, the periodical cicadas are easy prey for birds, reptiles, cats, and other small and large mammals [3]. The overall survival mechanism of the cicadas is just to simply overwhelm predators with their large numbers, allowing for most individuals to survive. Their large period before emergence is most likely a predator avoidance strategy. This being adopted to eliminate the possibility of predators having periodic population boosts that would be synchronized with the cicada emergence [13]. Another view of why their developmental period is so long is to prevent hybridization between broods of differing cycles. This adaptation most likely resulted from cycles during a period of heavy selection pressure that were brought on by lowered and isolated populations [14].&lt;br /&gt;
Cicada population cycles are momentous enough to affect other animals and plants. Tree growth has been observed to decrease the year before the emergence of a cicada brood, due to the increased eating by nymphs on roots [15]. The mole uses them as a food source and has shown to do well the year before an emergence, but do poorly the following year due to the reduced source of food [16]. The carcasses that are uneaten decompose on the ground providing nutrients to the soil [15]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Distribution==&lt;br /&gt;
The 17-year cicadas are found across the eastern, upper Midwestern, and Great Plains states of the U.S., but with some overlap the 13-year cicadas are found in the southern and Mississippi Valley States. Efforts are currently underway to generate new distribution maps of all periodical cicada broods. This effort makes use of crowdsourced records and records collected by entomologists [17].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]&amp;quot;Periodical Cicada&amp;quot;. magicicada.org.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Lloyd, M. &amp;amp; H.S. Dybas (1966). &amp;quot;The periodical cicada problem. I. Population ecology&amp;quot;. Evolution. 20 (2): 133–149. doi:10.2307/2406568. JSTOR 2406568.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Williams, K.S. &amp;amp; C. Simon (1995). &amp;quot;The ecology, behavior, and evolution of periodical cicadas&amp;quot; (PDF). Annual Review of Entomology. 40: 269–295. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.001413.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Alexander, Richard D.; Moore, Thomas E. (1962). &amp;quot;The Evolutionary Relationships of 17-Year and 13-Year Cicadas, and Three New Species (Homoptera, Cicadidae,Magicicada)&amp;quot; (PDF). University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. Retrieved 9 June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Capinera, John L. (2008). Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer. pp. 2785–2794. ISBN 1-4020-6242-7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] Stranahan, Nancy. &amp;quot;Nature Notes from the Eastern Forest&amp;quot;. Arc of Appalachia. Archived from the originalon 5 October 2011. Retrieved 10 June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] Cook, William M.; Robert D. Holt (2002). &amp;quot;Periodical cicada (Magicicada cassini) oviposition damage: visually impressive yet dynamically irrelevant&amp;quot; (PDF). American Midland Naturalist. 147 (2): 214–224. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2002)147[0214:PCMCOD]2.0.CO;2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 August 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Marlatt, C. L. (1907). The Periodical Cicada (Bulletin No. 71 - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. pp. 123–125.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9] White, J; Lloyd, M. (1979). &amp;quot;Seventeen year cicadas emerging after eighteen years-a new brood?&amp;quot;. Evolution. 33: 1193–1199. doi:10.2307/2407477.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10] &amp;quot;Magicicada Broods III and XXII will emerge in 2014&amp;quot;. www.magicicada.org.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[11] &amp;quot;Sexual Signals in Periodical Cicadas&amp;quot; (PDF). Behaviour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[12] Dybas, H. S.; Davis, D. D. (1962). &amp;quot;A populations census of seventeen-year periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada)&amp;quot;. Ecology. 43 (3): 432–444. doi:10.2307/1933372. JSTOR 1933372.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[13] Goles, E.; Schulz, O.; Markus, M. (2001). &amp;quot;Prime number selection of cycles in a predator-prey model&amp;quot;. Complexity. 6 (4): 33–38. doi:10.1002/cplx.1040.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[14] Cox, R. T. &amp;amp; C. E. Carlton (1988). &amp;quot;Paleoclimatic influences in the evolution of periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada spp.)&amp;quot;. American Midland Naturalist. 120 (1): 183–193. doi:10.2307/2425898. JSTOR 2425898.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[15] Yang, Louie H. (2004). &amp;quot;Periodical cicadas as resource pulses in North American forests&amp;quot;. Science. 306(5701): 1565–1567. Bibcode:2004Sci...306.1565Y. doi:10.1126/science.1103114. PMID 15567865.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[16] National Geographic: Cicada Outbreaks Linked to Other Animals&#039; Booms, Busts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[17] http://www.magicicada.org&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Periodical_Cicadas&amp;diff=1513</id>
		<title>Periodical Cicadas</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Periodical_Cicadas&amp;diff=1513"/>
		<updated>2018-04-19T22:15:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Periodical Cicadas==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:cicada.jpg|280px|thumb|right|Periodical Cicada]]&lt;br /&gt;
Periodical cicadas of eastern Northern America fall within the genus Magicicada. This 13-year and 17-year species are often referred to as “locusts” which is incorrect. Cicadas fall into the order Hemiptera while locusts fall into the order Orthoptera like grasshoppers [1].&lt;br /&gt;
The 13 and 17-year lives of cicadas is spent primarily underground where they consume the xylem from the roots of eastern U.S. deciduous trees [2]. Mature cicada nymphs crawl up to the surface and emerge in the springtime after 13 or 17 years at any location, simultaneously in massive numbers. These mature adults are only active for about 4 to 6 weeks after emergence [3]. To attract mates, males conglomerate into a noisy chorus. This lifecycle is finished after about 2 months of the initial emergence, where at this point the adult cicadas are absent for another 13 or 17-year period and the eggs have been laid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
The periodical cicada has a black dorsal thorax, red eyes, and translucent wings with orange veins. Depending on the species, the abdomen underside can be black, orange, or striped with orange and black [4].&lt;br /&gt;
Adults are usually 2.4 to 3.3 cm, which is a little smaller than most annual cicada species found in the same location of the United States. Females are larger than males at maturity [5]. &lt;br /&gt;
Males of the Magicicada attract females by forming large aggregations that “sing” in a chorus. This chorus typically sounds like loud buzzing, ticking, or both. The characteristics of these chorus “songs” vary depending on the species [6].&lt;br /&gt;
Cicadas are not known for biting or stinging. They have mouthparts that are used to pierce plants and suck their sap like other Auchenorrhyncha bugs. The only way a cicada can be harmful is that when being handled their proboscis can painfully pierce human skin. There is no evidence that they transmit disease and are venomous. Mature vegetation experience little threat from periodical cicadas, but planting new trees and shrubs is better to be pushed off until after their expected emergence. Twig die-off or flagging can result from egg-laying [7]. To prevent damage to young trees or shrubs during the egg-laying period, which starts a week after emergence of the first adult and lasts until females have died, they can be covered with cheesecloth or another similar material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lifecycle==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:cycle.png|150px|thumb|right|Transformation of the periodical cicada from the mature nymph to the adult]]&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every cicada spends many years as a juvenile underground, but then emerges above ground for a small adult period that can last several weeks to a few months. All the adults of the 7 periodical cicada species emerge in any one location all at once in the same year, in a synchronized fashion. Their lifecycle of periodicity are a very long 13 to 17 years. Annual cicadas are not synchronized; some adults mature every summer while the rest of the population develops underground.&lt;br /&gt;
During the juvenile stage periodical cicada nymphs live underground within 2 ft of the surface and feed on plant root juices [8]. These nymphs in their underground development undergo 5 instar stages (arthropod developmental stages). The difference in the 13 and 17-year lifecycle is the time taken for the maturity of the second instar. As the nymphs feed they move deeper below ground to get to larger roots during their time underground [9].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:molting.jpg|280px|thumb|left|Molting Cicada]]&lt;br /&gt;
Nymphs emerge when the soil temperature at about 20 cm deep is above 17.9 °C in the spring. The time of the emergence varies depending on location. In the far south the emergence occurs in late April or early May, in the far north they emerge late May to early June. When they emerge, nymphs move to complete their transformation into adults by climbing to a suitable place on nearby vegetation. After their final molt, they spend 6 days in the trees waiting for the hardening of their exoskeletons to complete. &lt;br /&gt;
As adults, periodical cicadas only live for a few weeks; having disappeared by mid-July. Their adult lives are short lived, with the singular purpose of reproduction. Using their tymbals, males “sing” a species-specific mating song. When males “sing” they usually aggregate together which is typically sexually attractive to females. These males alternate singing and short flights from tree to tree to find females [10].&lt;br /&gt;
Receptive females respond to these males with timed wing-flicks that attract them for mating [11]. The sound created by a chorus can reach a deafening 100 decibels. Other than their calling song, when approaching an individual female males produce a courtship song that is distinctive [4].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:eggslits.jpg|280px|thumb|left|Cicada egg slits]]&lt;br /&gt;
Mating can happen multiple times for both male and females, but females mostly mate just once. The female after mating cuts V-shaped slits in bark of young twigs and lays around 20 eggs in each slit. Totaling of around 600 or more eggs. The eggs hatch into newborn nymphs that drop to the ground after about 6 to 10 weeks, where they then burrow into the ground to start another 13 or 17-year cycle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Survival Strategy==&lt;br /&gt;
===Predator Satiation=== &lt;br /&gt;
Cicada nymphs emerge synchronously in large numbers, more than 1.5 million individuals per acre sometimes [12]. This large emergence is a survival trait called predator satiation. Early after their emergence, the periodical cicadas are easy prey for birds, reptiles, cats, and other small and large mammals [3]. The overall survival mechanism of the cicadas is just to simply overwhelm predators with their large numbers, allowing for most individuals to survive. Their large period before emergence is most likely a predator avoidance strategy. This being adopted to eliminate the possibility of predators having periodic population boosts that would be synchronized with the cicada emergence [13]. Another view of why their developmental period is so long is to prevent hybridization between broods of differing cycles. This adaptation most likely resulted from cycles during a period of heavy selection pressure that were brought on by lowered and isolated populations [14].&lt;br /&gt;
Cicada population cycles are momentous enough to affect other animals and plants. Tree growth has been observed to decrease the year before the emergence of a cicada brood, due to the increased eating by nymphs on roots [15]. The mole uses them as a food source and has shown to do well the year before an emergence, but do poorly the following year due to the reduced source of food [16]. The carcasses that are uneaten decompose on the ground providing nutrients to the soil [15]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Distribution==&lt;br /&gt;
The 17-year cicadas are found across the eastern, upper Midwestern, and Great Plains states of the U.S., but with some overlap the 13-year cicadas are found in the southern and Mississippi Valley States. Efforts are currently underway to generate new distribution maps of all periodical cicada broods. This effort makes use of crowdsourced records and records collected by entomologists [17].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]&amp;quot;Periodical Cicada&amp;quot;. magicicada.org.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Lloyd, M. &amp;amp; H.S. Dybas (1966). &amp;quot;The periodical cicada problem. I. Population ecology&amp;quot;. Evolution. 20 (2): 133–149. doi:10.2307/2406568. JSTOR 2406568.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Williams, K.S. &amp;amp; C. Simon (1995). &amp;quot;The ecology, behavior, and evolution of periodical cicadas&amp;quot; (PDF). Annual Review of Entomology. 40: 269–295. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.001413.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Alexander, Richard D.; Moore, Thomas E. (1962). &amp;quot;The Evolutionary Relationships of 17-Year and 13-Year Cicadas, and Three New Species (Homoptera, Cicadidae,Magicicada)&amp;quot; (PDF). University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. Retrieved 9 June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Capinera, John L. (2008). Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer. pp. 2785–2794. ISBN 1-4020-6242-7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] Stranahan, Nancy. &amp;quot;Nature Notes from the Eastern Forest&amp;quot;. Arc of Appalachia. Archived from the originalon 5 October 2011. Retrieved 10 June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] Cook, William M.; Robert D. Holt (2002). &amp;quot;Periodical cicada (Magicicada cassini) oviposition damage: visually impressive yet dynamically irrelevant&amp;quot; (PDF). American Midland Naturalist. 147 (2): 214–224. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2002)147[0214:PCMCOD]2.0.CO;2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 August 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Marlatt, C. L. (1907). The Periodical Cicada (Bulletin No. 71 - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. pp. 123–125.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9] White, J; Lloyd, M. (1979). &amp;quot;Seventeen year cicadas emerging after eighteen years-a new brood?&amp;quot;. Evolution. 33: 1193–1199. doi:10.2307/2407477.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10] &amp;quot;Magicicada Broods III and XXII will emerge in 2014&amp;quot;. www.magicicada.org.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[11] &amp;quot;Sexual Signals in Periodical Cicadas&amp;quot; (PDF). Behaviour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[12] Dybas, H. S.; Davis, D. D. (1962). &amp;quot;A populations census of seventeen-year periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada)&amp;quot;. Ecology. 43 (3): 432–444. doi:10.2307/1933372. JSTOR 1933372.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[13] Goles, E.; Schulz, O.; Markus, M. (2001). &amp;quot;Prime number selection of cycles in a predator-prey model&amp;quot;. Complexity. 6 (4): 33–38. doi:10.1002/cplx.1040.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[14] Cox, R. T. &amp;amp; C. E. Carlton (1988). &amp;quot;Paleoclimatic influences in the evolution of periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada spp.)&amp;quot;. American Midland Naturalist. 120 (1): 183–193. doi:10.2307/2425898. JSTOR 2425898.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[15] Yang, Louie H. (2004). &amp;quot;Periodical cicadas as resource pulses in North American forests&amp;quot;. Science. 306(5701): 1565–1567. Bibcode:2004Sci...306.1565Y. doi:10.1126/science.1103114. PMID 15567865.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[16] National Geographic: Cicada Outbreaks Linked to Other Animals&#039; Booms, Busts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[17] http://www.magicicada.org&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:Finalmolt.jpg&amp;diff=1502</id>
		<title>File:Finalmolt.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:Finalmolt.jpg&amp;diff=1502"/>
		<updated>2018-04-19T21:42:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:Eggslits.jpg&amp;diff=1501</id>
		<title>File:Eggslits.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:Eggslits.jpg&amp;diff=1501"/>
		<updated>2018-04-19T21:42:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:Molting.jpg&amp;diff=1500</id>
		<title>File:Molting.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:Molting.jpg&amp;diff=1500"/>
		<updated>2018-04-19T21:41:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:Cycle.png&amp;diff=1499</id>
		<title>File:Cycle.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:Cycle.png&amp;diff=1499"/>
		<updated>2018-04-19T21:41:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:Cicada.jpg&amp;diff=1498</id>
		<title>File:Cicada.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:Cicada.jpg&amp;diff=1498"/>
		<updated>2018-04-19T21:39:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Periodical_Cicadas&amp;diff=1497</id>
		<title>Periodical Cicadas</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Periodical_Cicadas&amp;diff=1497"/>
		<updated>2018-04-19T21:38:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: Created page with &amp;quot;==Periodical Cicadas== Periodical cicadas of eastern Northern America fall within the genus Magicicada. This 13-year and 17-year species are often referred to as “locusts”...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Periodical Cicadas==&lt;br /&gt;
Periodical cicadas of eastern Northern America fall within the genus Magicicada. This 13-year and 17-year species are often referred to as “locusts” which is incorrect. Cicadas fall into the order Hemiptera while locusts fall into the order Orthoptera like grasshoppers [1].&lt;br /&gt;
The 13 and 17-year lives of cicadas is spent primarily underground where they consume the xylem from the roots of eastern U.S. deciduous trees [2]. Mature cicada nymphs crawl up to the surface and emerge in the springtime after 13 or 17 years at any location, simultaneously in massive numbers. These mature adults are only active for about 4 to 6 weeks after emergence [3]. To attract mates, males conglomerate into a noisy chorus. This lifecycle is finished after about 2 months of the initial emergence, where at this point the adult cicadas are absent for another 13 or 17-year period and the eggs have been laid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
The periodical cicada has a black dorsal thorax, red eyes, and translucent wings with orange veins. Depending on the species, the abdomen underside can be black, orange, or striped with orange and black [4].&lt;br /&gt;
Adults are usually 2.4 to 3.3 cm, which is a little smaller than most annual cicada species found in the same location of the United States. Females are larger than males at maturity [5]. &lt;br /&gt;
Males of the Magicicada attract females by forming large aggregations that “sing” in a chorus. This chorus typically sounds like loud buzzing, ticking, or both. The characteristics of these chorus “songs” vary depending on the species [6].&lt;br /&gt;
Cicadas are not known for biting or stinging. They have mouthparts that are used to pierce plants and suck their sap like other Auchenorrhyncha bugs. The only way a cicada can be harmful is that when being handled their proboscis can painfully pierce human skin. There is no evidence that they transmit disease and are venomous. Mature vegetation experience little threat from periodical cicadas, but planting new trees and shrubs is better to be pushed off until after their expected emergence. Twig die-off or flagging can result from egg-laying [7]. To prevent damage to young trees or shrubs during the egg-laying period, which starts a week after emergence of the first adult and lasts until females have died, they can be covered with cheesecloth or another similar material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lifecycle==&lt;br /&gt;
Almost every cicada spends many years as a juvenile underground, but then emerges above ground for a small adult period that can last several weeks to a few months. All the adults of the 7 periodical cicada species emerge in any one location all at once in the same year, in a synchronized fashion. Their lifecycle of periodicity are a very long 13 to 17 years. Annual cicadas are not synchronized; some adults mature every summer while the rest of the population develops underground.&lt;br /&gt;
During the juvenile stage periodical cicada nymphs live underground within 2 ft of the surface and feed on plant root juices [8]. These nymphs in their underground development undergo 5 instar stages (arthropod developmental stages). The difference in the 13 and 17-year lifecycle is the time taken for the maturity of the second instar. As the nymphs feed they move deeper below ground to get to larger roots during their time underground [9].&lt;br /&gt;
Nymphs emerge when the soil temperature at about 20 cm deep is above 17.9 °C in the spring. The time of the emergence varies depending on location. In the far south the emergence occurs in late April or early May, in the far north they emerge late May to early June. When they emerge, nymphs move to complete their transformation into adults by climbing to a suitable place on nearby vegetation. After their final molt, they spend 6 days in the trees waiting for the hardening of their exoskeletons to complete. &lt;br /&gt;
As adults, periodical cicadas only live for a few weeks; having disappeared by mid-July. Their adult lives are short lived, with the singular purpose of reproduction. Using their tymbals, males “sing” a species-specific mating song. When males “sing” they usually aggregate together which is typically sexually attractive to females. These males alternate singing and short flights from tree to tree to find females [10].&lt;br /&gt;
Receptive females respond to these males with timed wing-flicks that attract them for mating [11]. The sound created by a chorus can reach a deafening 100 decibels. Other than their calling song, when approaching an individual female males produce a courtship song that is distinctive [4].&lt;br /&gt;
Mating can happen multiple times for both male and females, but females mostly mate just once. The female after mating cuts V-shaped slits in bark of young twigs and lays around 20 eggs in each slit. Totaling of around 600 or more eggs. The eggs hatch into newborn nymphs that drop to the ground after about 6 to 10 weeks, where they then burrow into the ground to start another 13 or 17-year cycle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Survival Strategy==&lt;br /&gt;
===Predator Satiation=== &lt;br /&gt;
Cicada nymphs emerge synchronously in large numbers, more than 1.5 million individuals per acre sometimes [12]. This large emergence is a survival trait called predator satiation. Early after their emergence, the periodical cicadas are easy prey for birds, reptiles, cats, and other small and large mammals [3]. The overall survival mechanism of the cicadas is just to simply overwhelm predators with their large numbers, allowing for most individuals to survive. Their large period before emergence is most likely a predator avoidance strategy. This being adopted to eliminate the possibility of predators having periodic population boosts that would be synchronized with the cicada emergence [13]. Another view of why their developmental period is so long is to prevent hybridization between broods of differing cycles. This adaptation most likely resulted from cycles during a period of heavy selection pressure that were brought on by lowered and isolated populations [14].&lt;br /&gt;
Cicada population cycles are momentous enough to affect other animals and plants. Tree growth has been observed to decrease the year before the emergence of a cicada brood, due to the increased eating by nymphs on roots [15]. The mole uses them as a food source and has shown to do well the year before an emergence, but do poorly the following year due to the reduced source of food [16]. The carcasses that are uneaten decompose on the ground providing nutrients to the soil [15]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Distribution==&lt;br /&gt;
The 17-year cicadas are found across the eastern, upper Midwestern, and Great Plains states of the U.S., but with some overlap the 13-year cicadas are found in the southern and Mississippi Valley States. Efforts are currently underway to generate new distribution maps of all periodical cicada broods. This effort makes use of crowdsourced records and records collected by entomologists [17].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]&amp;quot;Periodical Cicada&amp;quot;. magicicada.org.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Lloyd, M. &amp;amp; H.S. Dybas (1966). &amp;quot;The periodical cicada problem. I. Population ecology&amp;quot;. Evolution. 20 (2): 133–149. doi:10.2307/2406568. JSTOR 2406568.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Williams, K.S. &amp;amp; C. Simon (1995). &amp;quot;The ecology, behavior, and evolution of periodical cicadas&amp;quot; (PDF). Annual Review of Entomology. 40: 269–295. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.001413.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Alexander, Richard D.; Moore, Thomas E. (1962). &amp;quot;The Evolutionary Relationships of 17-Year and 13-Year Cicadas, and Three New Species (Homoptera, Cicadidae,Magicicada)&amp;quot; (PDF). University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. Retrieved 9 June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Capinera, John L. (2008). Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer. pp. 2785–2794. ISBN 1-4020-6242-7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] Stranahan, Nancy. &amp;quot;Nature Notes from the Eastern Forest&amp;quot;. Arc of Appalachia. Archived from the originalon 5 October 2011. Retrieved 10 June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] Cook, William M.; Robert D. Holt (2002). &amp;quot;Periodical cicada (Magicicada cassini) oviposition damage: visually impressive yet dynamically irrelevant&amp;quot; (PDF). American Midland Naturalist. 147 (2): 214–224. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2002)147[0214:PCMCOD]2.0.CO;2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 August 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Marlatt, C. L. (1907). The Periodical Cicada (Bulletin No. 71 - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology). Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office. pp. 123–125.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9] White, J; Lloyd, M. (1979). &amp;quot;Seventeen year cicadas emerging after eighteen years-a new brood?&amp;quot;. Evolution. 33: 1193–1199. doi:10.2307/2407477.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10] &amp;quot;Magicicada Broods III and XXII will emerge in 2014&amp;quot;. www.magicicada.org.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[11] &amp;quot;Sexual Signals in Periodical Cicadas&amp;quot; (PDF). Behaviour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[12] Dybas, H. S.; Davis, D. D. (1962). &amp;quot;A populations census of seventeen-year periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada)&amp;quot;. Ecology. 43 (3): 432–444. doi:10.2307/1933372. JSTOR 1933372.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[13] Goles, E.; Schulz, O.; Markus, M. (2001). &amp;quot;Prime number selection of cycles in a predator-prey model&amp;quot;. Complexity. 6 (4): 33–38. doi:10.1002/cplx.1040.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[14] Cox, R. T. &amp;amp; C. E. Carlton (1988). &amp;quot;Paleoclimatic influences in the evolution of periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada spp.)&amp;quot;. American Midland Naturalist. 120 (1): 183–193. doi:10.2307/2425898. JSTOR 2425898.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[15] Yang, Louie H. (2004). &amp;quot;Periodical cicadas as resource pulses in North American forests&amp;quot;. Science. 306(5701): 1565–1567. Bibcode:2004Sci...306.1565Y. doi:10.1126/science.1103114. PMID 15567865.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[16] National Geographic: Cicada Outbreaks Linked to Other Animals&#039; Booms, Busts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[17] http://www.magicicada.org&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=1435</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=1435"/>
		<updated>2018-04-19T16:58:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;[[Soil Ecology]] WIKI from the University at Buffalo&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;=&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rhizo.jpg|230px|thumb|left|Soil ecology encompasses interactions between plants, soils, and the organisms that live within them.]]  [[Soil]] is a vast reservoir for a wide [[diversity]] of [[organisms]].  [[Plant roots]] explore this [[diversity]] daily.  Various other [[animals]] consume [[smaller creatures]] either intentionally or unintentionally by [[foraging]] on [[plant roots]], [[insects]], and [[microorganisms]].&lt;br /&gt;
Soil ecology is the study of how these [[soil organisms]] interact with other organisms and their environment - their influence on and response to numerous [[soil processes]] and [[properties]] form the basis for delivering [[essential ecosystem services]].  Some of the key processes in soil are [[nutrient cycling]], soil [[aggregate formation]], and [[biodiversity interactions]]. Sometimes, individual species can strongly influence overall soil ecology, such as [[Black Willow]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[diversity]] and abundance of [[soil life]] exceeds that of any other ecosystem.  [[Plant establishment]], competitiveness, and growth is governed largely by the [[ecology belowground]], with many interactions attributed to the interconnectivity of [[Plant Roots]] due to [[Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi]] and [[Ectomycorrhizal Fungi]].  Therefore, a deep understanding of these systems are an essential component of plant sciences and [[terrestrial ecology]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the concepts of soil ecology were developed by Hans Jenny and his creation of the [[Jenny Equation]].  These concepts envelop the ideas of the abiotic interactions of [[Organisms]] and plants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=List of Possible Topics:=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Ecosystem Services]], [[Vegetable Mould]], [[Founders of Soil Concepts]], [[Pedogenesis]], [[Jenny Equation]], [[Water Behavior in Soils]], [[Soil Horizons]], [[Soil Textures]], [[Monocots]], [[Dicots]], [[Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi]], [[Rhizodeposition]], [[Soil Sampling Methods]], [[Zygomycota]], [[Glomeromycota]], [[Ascomycota]], [[Basidiomycota]], [[Humus]], [[Clay]], [[Silt]], [[Loam]], [[Soil Structures]], [[Flavonoids]] , [[Diazotrophs]], [[Black Willow]], [[Cryprogamic Soil Crust]], [[Ciliates]], [[Nutrient Cycling]], [[Isopods]], [[Nematodes]], [[Actinorhiza]], [[Erythraeidae]] [[Amynthas_agrestis]] [[Lichen]] [[Tardigrades]] [[Ectomycorrizae]] , [[Periodical Cicadas]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;If you dudes/dudettes have any questions, email me at krzidell and I&#039;ll do everything I can.&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=929</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=929"/>
		<updated>2018-03-12T17:43:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like &#039;&#039;&#039;texture by feel&#039;&#039;&#039;, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as &#039;&#039;&#039;the hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include sand, silt, and clay. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of sand, silt, and clay. Class systems most used are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems which both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Texture Classifications==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle [9]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include sand, sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt, sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of sand, silt, and clay present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size (clay, silt, sand) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). Loam is a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of sand, silt, and a smaller amount of clay. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than loam itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of sand, silt, and clay within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay that you have in your given soil sample (see &#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say silt, and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent silt and 35 percent clay then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
Texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Particle Sizes==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wentworth Grain size.png|230px|thumb|right|The terminology for grain size naming adapted from Wentworth by the USGS [8]]]&lt;br /&gt;
For soil, there are specific particle size ranges that determine what its components are classified as. Be it clay, silt, or sand. Clay particles are amongst the smallest, having diameters of less than 0.002 mm. Clay is structured in a plate-like manner which also allows for its hydroplastic properties induced by the increased surface area due to its small particle size [4]. Following clay are silt particles having diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm with the USDA classification. Sand has the largest of the particle sizes with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm. Sand is divided further due its large diameter range into the categories of very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, and very coarse sand. The USDA and WRB classifications differ only slightly in the ranges of particle diameter, but both classify clay particles with the same value. The chart to the right provides a more detailed description of the soil particles and their classifications [8].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Soil particle names&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
USDA classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
WRB classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Clay&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Silt&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.063&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.05 - 0.10&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.063 - 0.125&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.10 - 0.25&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.125 - 0.20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Medium sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.25 - 0.50&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.20 - 0.63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.50 - 1.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.63 - 1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 1.00 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.25 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Methods of Determining Soil Texture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Texture by feel Method===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Texture_by_Feel.png|280px|thumb|right|Texture by feel flowchart [10]]]&lt;br /&gt;
This method of determining soil texture is very qualitative. It allows for a quick hands-on approach to assess an estimate as to what soil class you may have. No equipment is required, just some knowledge of particular soil characteristics is needed. These soil characteristics are laid out within the texture by feel flowchart to the right [10]. The flowchart is relatively easy to follow and will help you determine your soil type [5]. Although you will be able to roughly determine what class your soil sample resides in, you won’t directly know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay are present.&lt;br /&gt;
To use the texture by feel flowchart, simply start by taking a small portion of your soil sample, wetting it, and trying to form it into a ribbon. This can be done by forming the soil portion into a ball and then pressing it with your fingers until it has a longer flat shape to it. If the ball resists being formed into a ribbon (falling apart) then your soil sample is most likely sand. If the ball doesn’t fall apart but also doesn’t form into a ribbon, then your soil may be a loamy sand. If the soil sample does form a ribbon, then you must determine roughly what length the ribbon is that was able to be formed. Once this is determined, follow the flowchart in the respective path of the ribbon length. Further classification is then found by feeling how gritty or smooth the soil sample feels after you excessively wet it in your palm [1]. The method of texture by feel of course takes practice, but is very useful when lab equipment is not at your disposal or if you are working in the field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Hydrometer Method===&lt;br /&gt;
The hydrometer method, developed in 1927 [7], is a very widely used way to determine soil texture through quantitative means. This method provides percentage estimates of the sand, silt, and clay within a given soil [6]. The major requirement for this method is the use of the chemical compound sodium hexametaphosphate. Sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent to separate aggregates of soil. To carry out this method, start by mixing some of the soil with hexametaphosphate in a test tube. Then place the solution into an orbital shaker overnight or shake the tube with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, remove the stone, and then place it in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution is then transferred to 1 liter graduated cylinders and then filled with water. The soil is then mixed to help separate the soil particles [6]. The particles separate based on their size and sink. The largest being sand particles with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm sink to the bottom first. Following are the medium-sized silt particles with diameters ranging from 0.002 mm to 0.05 mm. Then finally the smallest particles being clay with diameters less than 0.002 mm settle out above the silt layer. A soil hydrometer is then used to take the soil measurements. A soil hydrometer measures the density of a liquid compared to the density of water, or the relative density of the liquid. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution. To start the measurements, place the hydrometer into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at varying time frames. For sand, place it in for 45 seconds to measure that content. For silt, place it in for 1.5 hours. Then for clay, place it in for 6-24 hours. The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded [6].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows [6]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]	 Soil Science Division Staff. 2017. Soil survey manual. C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H.C. Monger (eds.). USDA Handbook 18. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]	Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture. pp. 63–65. Retrieved 30 August 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]	Lindbo, Hayes, Adewunmi (2012). Know Soil Know Life: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation. Soil Science Society of America. p. 17. ISBN 9780891189541.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]	 Foth, Henry D. (1990). Fundamentals of Soil Science 8th Edition. Canada: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons. p. 23. ISBN 0-471-52279-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]	Thien, Steven. &amp;quot;Determining Soil Texture by the &amp;quot;Feel Method&amp;quot;&amp;quot; (PDF). NDHealth.gov.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]	Bouyoucos, George. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]	Bouyoucos G. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. American Society of Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]	Wentworth grain size chart from United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006- 1195, &amp;quot;Surficial sediment character of the Louisiana offshore continental shelf region: A GIS Compilation&amp;quot; by Jeffress Williams, Matthew A. Arsenault, Brian J. Buczkowski, Jane A. Reid, James G. Flocks, Mark A. Kulp, Shea Penland, and Chris J. Jenkins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]	A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10]	Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/edu/?cid=nrcs142p2_054311&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Structures&amp;diff=851</id>
		<title>Soil Structures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Structures&amp;diff=851"/>
		<updated>2018-03-10T20:43:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil Structure&#039;&#039;&#039;     &lt;br /&gt;
Soil structure refers to an arrangement or groups of particles. These arrangements can be composed of any size particles ranging from nonstructural such as loose, coarse grains, to aggregates such as chunks of sod (5). Soil structures also encompass the pore space between soil particles. Soil structure is achieved when soil particles experience cohesion forces that are greater than adhesion. Cohesion forces allow soil particles to clump, bind, and aggregate. Stabilization is achieved through bonding agents such as plant, microbial polysaccharides, and gums (5).  Roots and Fungal Hyphae such as mycorrhizal fungi can act as bonding agents. Some soils have a lack of structure; this occurs when no particles stay in place with an introduction of a disturbance such as a shovel blade (7). Soil structure influences ecosystem properties such as water retention, soil water movement, erosion, nutrient recycling, root penetration, and crop yield (2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil structure can be observed as a soil mass when, under stress, it breaks along planes. These planes form the boundary of structural units called a “ped”, which have different spatial soil particle arrangements (7). Clods are formed through artificial human caused disturbances such as a mechanical disturbance (tilling a field).  Such disturbances allow denser particles to be configured to the surface in the layer (7). One soil may have various peds based on shape in the subsurface and surface horizons (5).  Peds are shaped by temperature, moisture, chemical, and biological conditions. Each of these conditions may vary depending on the level in the soil horizon (5). The Pedon is the area of soil structure being categorized. It can be as small as 1 square meter or as large as 10 square meters (5). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil Structure Formation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil structure is shaped by the input of organic compounds into the soil, plants, fungi, microbes, soil compaction, freezing-thawing, wetting, and drying events (5).  Aggregates are the physical and biological compounds in which soil particles coheir to. Aggregation can be increased through root activity. Roots release Polygalacturonic Acid which acts to stabilize aggregates through a higher bond strength and a slower wetting rate (2). The more fibrous a root is, the more macro-aggregation that will occur within the rhizosphere (2). One of the most important biotic influences on aggregates is AMF or Arbuscular Mycorrhiza through the release of Glomalin, a glycoprotein which acts to stabilize aggregates (2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil agg.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1&#039;&#039;&#039; Soil Microaggregates. Note the influence of root fibers, hyphae, and microbial debris. &#039;&#039;Image From Tisdall &amp;amp; Oades, 1982&#039;&#039; (10) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Classification&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soil structures can be classified by their size, structure, shape, and grade&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil structure.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; The various soil structure types. (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil_structures_picture.png ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Soil structure types looking at soil samples (9)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil Grade:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Grade referrers to the distinctness of soils. Three classes are chosen based on ese of separation into specific units and the particles ability to stick together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Strong:&#039;&#039;&#039; Soil units separating cleanly into whole units with disturbance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Moderate:&#039;&#039;&#039; Soil units are noticed as well formed pre disturbance. Post disturbance, soil will separate into a mixture of primarily whole units, broken units and some material not in a unit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Weak:&#039;&#039;&#039; Soil units, when disturbed, are mostly not in units while some stay in units. Most soil particles will show no planes of weakness. If the soil surface arrangement differs from the particles within, this is still a soil structure compared to a uniform consistency showing no planes of weakness which is most likely a structure less soil sample. (7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Soil classification.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 4:&#039;&#039;&#039; A soil structure classification table incorporating Shape/arrangement, structure class, and grade. (8)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;References&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1: &amp;quot;BlackHillsGarden.com.&amp;quot; SOIL STRUCTURE. » BlackHillsGarden.com - Gardening Experience in the Black Hills, 2018. Web. 08 Mar. 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2: Bronick, C.J., and R. La. &amp;quot;Soil Structure and Management: A Review.&amp;quot; Shibboleth Authentication Request. The Ohio State University, Jan. 2005. Web. 07 Mar. 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3:Buckman, H. O., &amp;amp; Brady, N. C. (1960). The nature and properties of soils: A college text of edaphology. New York: Macmillan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4: Cakmak, A. S. Soil-structure Interaction. Vol. 43;43.;. New York;Southampton;Amsterdam;Boston;: Elsevier, 1987. Web. 6 Mar. 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5: Coleman, D. C., D., A. C. J., &amp;amp; Hendrix, P. F. (2004). Fundamentals of soil ecology. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6: Gao W, Hodgkinson L, Jin K, Watts CW, Ashton RW, Shen J, Ren T, Dodd IC, Binley A, Phillips AL, Hedden P, Hawkesford MJ, Whalley WR (2016a) Deep &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
roots and soil structure. Plant Cell Environ 39:1662–1668&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7:&amp;quot;Natural Resources Conservation Service.&amp;quot; SSM - Ch. 3. Examination and Description of Soil Profiles | NRCS Soils. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Mar. 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8:&amp;quot;Soil Structure: Classification, Genesis and Evaluation.&amp;quot; Soil Management. N.p., 20 July 2016. Web. 08 Mar. 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9:&amp;quot;Soil Structure | Nature of Soil | Soil Definition | Components of Soil.&amp;quot; ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ENGINEERING. N.p., 25 Dec. 2017. Web. 8 Mar. 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10:TISDALL, J. M., and J. M. OADES. &amp;quot;Organic Matter and Water‐stable Aggregates in Soils.&amp;quot; Journal of Soil Science. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 28 July &lt;br /&gt;
2006. Web. 08 Mar. 2018.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=453</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=453"/>
		<updated>2018-03-08T04:34:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like &#039;&#039;&#039;texture by feel&#039;&#039;&#039;, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as &#039;&#039;&#039;the hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include sand, silt, and clay. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of sand, silt, and clay. Class systems most used are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems which both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Texture Classifications==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include sand, sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt, sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of sand, silt, and clay present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size (clay, silt, sand) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). Loam is more of a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of sand, silt, and a smaller amount of clay. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than loam itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of sand, silt, and clay within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay that you have in your given soil sample (see &#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say silt, and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent silt and 35 percent clay then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
The texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;br /&gt;
==Particle Sizes==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wentworth Grain size.png|230px|thumb|right|The terminology for grain size naming adapted from Wentworth by the USGS]]&lt;br /&gt;
For soil, there are specific particle size ranges that determine what its components are classified as. Be it clay, silt, or sand. Clay particles are amongst the smallest having diameters less than 0.002 mm. Clay is structured in a plate like manner which also allows for its hydroplastic properties induced by the increased surface area due to its small particle size [4]. Following clay are silt particles having diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm with the USDA classification. Sand has the largest of the particle sizes with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm. Sand is divided further due its large diameter range into the categories of very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, and very coarse sand. The USDA and WRB classifications differ only slightly in the ranges of particle diameter, but both classify clay particles with the same value. The chart to the right provides a more detailed description of the soil particles and their classifications [8].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Soil particle names&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
USDA classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
WRB classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Clay&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Silt&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.063&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.05 - 0.10&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.063 - 0.125&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.10 - 0.25&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.125 - 0.20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Medium sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.25 - 0.50&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.20 - 0.63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.50 - 1.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.63 - 1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 1.00 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.25 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==Methods of Determining Soil Texture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Texture by feel Method===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Texture_by_Feel.png|280px|thumb|right|Texture by feel flowchart]]&lt;br /&gt;
This method of determining soil texture is very qualitative. It allows for a quick hands-on approach to assess an estimate as to what soil class you may have. No equipment is required, just some knowledge of particular soil characteristics is needed. These soil characteristics are laid out within the texture by feel flowchart to the right [10]. The flowchart is relatively easy to follow and will help you determine your soil type [5]. Although you will be able to roughly determine what class your soil sample resides in, you won’t directly know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay are present.&lt;br /&gt;
To use the texture by feel flowchart simply start by taking a small portion of your soil sample, wetting it, and trying to form it into a ribbon. This can be done by forming the soil portion into a ball and then pressing it with your fingers until it has a longer flat shape to it. If the ball resists being formed into a ribbon (falling apart) then your soil sample is most likely sand. If the ball doesn’t fall apart but also doesn’t form into a ribbon, then your soil may be a loamy sand. If the soil sample does form a ribbon, then you must determine roughly what length the ribbon is able to be formed. Once this is determined follow the flowchart in the respective path of the ribbon length. Further classification is then found by feeling how gritty or smooth the soil sample feels after you excessively wet it in your palm [1]. The method of texture by feel of course takes practice, but is very useful when lab equipment is not at your disposal or if you are working in the field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Hydrometer Method===&lt;br /&gt;
The hydrometer method, developed in 1927 [7], is a very widely used way to determine soil texture through quantitative means. This method provides percentage estimates of the sand, silt, and clay within a given soil [6]. The major requirement for this method is the use of the chemical compound sodium hexametaphosphate. Sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent to separate aggregates of soil. To carry out this method, start by mixing some of the soil with hexametaphosphate in a test tube. Then place the solution into an orbital shaker overnight or shake the tube with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, remove the stone, and then place it in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution is then transferred to 1 liter graduated cylinders and then filled with water. The soil is then mixed to help separate the soil particles [6]. The particles separate based on their size and sink. The largest being sand particles with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm sink to the bottom first. Following are the medium-sized silt particles with diameters ranging from 0.002 mm to 0.05 mm. Then finally the smallest particles being clay with diameters less than 0.002 mm settle out above the silt layer. A soil hydrometer is then used to take the soil measurements. A soil hydrometer measures the density of a liquid compared to the density of water, or the relative density of the liquid. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution. To start the measurements, place the hydrometer into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at varying time frames. For sand, place it in for 45 seconds to measure that content. For silt, place it in for 1.5 hours. Then for clay, place it in for 6-24 hours. The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded [6].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows [6]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]	 Soil Science Division Staff. 2017. Soil survey manual. C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H.C. Monger (eds.). USDA Handbook 18. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]	Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture. pp. 63–65. Retrieved 30 August 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]	Lindbo, Hayes, Adewunmi (2012). Know Soil Know Life: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation. Soil Science Society of America. p. 17. ISBN 9780891189541.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]	 Foth, Henry D. (1990). Fundamentals of Soil Science 8th Edition. Canada: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons. p. 23. ISBN 0-471-52279-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]	Thien, Steven. &amp;quot;Determining Soil Texture by the &amp;quot;Feel Method&amp;quot;&amp;quot; (PDF). NDHealth.gov.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]	Bouyoucos, George. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]	Bouyoucos G. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. American Society of Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]	Wentworth grain size chart from United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006- 1195, &amp;quot;Surficial sediment character of the Louisiana offshore continental shelf region: A GIS Compilation&amp;quot; by Jeffress Williams, Matthew A. Arsenault, Brian J. Buczkowski, Jane A. Reid, James G. Flocks, Mark A. Kulp, Shea Penland, and Chris J. Jenkins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]	A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10]	Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/edu/?cid=nrcs142p2_054311&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=451</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=451"/>
		<updated>2018-03-08T04:33:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like &#039;&#039;&#039;texture by feel&#039;&#039;&#039;, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as &#039;&#039;&#039;the hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include sand, silt, and clay. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of sand, silt, and clay. Class systems most used are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems which both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Texture Classifications==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include sand, sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt, sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of sand, silt, and clay present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size (clay, silt, sand) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). Loam is more of a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of sand, silt, and a smaller amount of clay. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than loam itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of sand, silt, and clay within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay that you have in your given soil sample (see &#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say silt, and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent silt and 35 percent clay then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
The texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Particle Sizes&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wentworth Grain size.png|230px|thumb|right|The terminology for grain size naming adapted from Wentworth by the USGS]]&lt;br /&gt;
For soil, there are specific particle size ranges that determine what its components are classified as. Be it clay, silt, or sand. Clay particles are amongst the smallest having diameters less than 0.002 mm. Clay is structured in a plate like manner which also allows for its hydroplastic properties induced by the increased surface area due to its small particle size [4]. Following clay are silt particles having diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm with the USDA classification. Sand has the largest of the particle sizes with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm. Sand is divided further due its large diameter range into the categories of very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, and very coarse sand. The USDA and WRB classifications differ only slightly in the ranges of particle diameter, but both classify clay particles with the same value. The chart to the right provides a more detailed description of the soil particles and their classifications [8].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Soil particle names&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
USDA classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
WRB classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Clay&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Silt&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.063&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.05 - 0.10&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.063 - 0.125&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.10 - 0.25&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.125 - 0.20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Medium sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.25 - 0.50&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.20 - 0.63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.50 - 1.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.63 - 1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 1.00 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.25 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Methods of Determining Soil Texture&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Texture by feel Method===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Texture_by_Feel.png|280px|thumb|right|Texture by feel flowchart]]&lt;br /&gt;
This method of determining soil texture is very qualitative. It allows for a quick hands-on approach to assess an estimate as to what soil class you may have. No equipment is required, just some knowledge of particular soil characteristics is needed. These soil characteristics are laid out within the texture by feel flowchart to the right [10]. The flowchart is relatively easy to follow and will help you determine your soil type [5]. Although you will be able to roughly determine what class your soil sample resides in, you won’t directly know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay are present.&lt;br /&gt;
To use the texture by feel flowchart simply start by taking a small portion of your soil sample, wetting it, and trying to form it into a ribbon. This can be done by forming the soil portion into a ball and then pressing it with your fingers until it has a longer flat shape to it. If the ball resists being formed into a ribbon (falling apart) then your soil sample is most likely sand. If the ball doesn’t fall apart but also doesn’t form into a ribbon, then your soil may be a loamy sand. If the soil sample does form a ribbon, then you must determine roughly what length the ribbon is able to be formed. Once this is determined follow the flowchart in the respective path of the ribbon length. Further classification is then found by feeling how gritty or smooth the soil sample feels after you excessively wet it in your palm [1]. The method of texture by feel of course takes practice, but is very useful when lab equipment is not at your disposal or if you are working in the field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Hydrometer Method===&lt;br /&gt;
The hydrometer method, developed in 1927 [7], is a very widely used way to determine soil texture through quantitative means. This method provides percentage estimates of the sand, silt, and clay within a given soil [6]. The major requirement for this method is the use of the chemical compound sodium hexametaphosphate. Sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent to separate aggregates of soil. To carry out this method, start by mixing some of the soil with hexametaphosphate in a test tube. Then place the solution into an orbital shaker overnight or shake the tube with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, remove the stone, and then place it in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution is then transferred to 1 liter graduated cylinders and then filled with water. The soil is then mixed to help separate the soil particles [6]. The particles separate based on their size and sink. The largest being sand particles with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm sink to the bottom first. Following are the medium-sized silt particles with diameters ranging from 0.002 mm to 0.05 mm. Then finally the smallest particles being clay with diameters less than 0.002 mm settle out above the silt layer. A soil hydrometer is then used to take the soil measurements. A soil hydrometer measures the density of a liquid compared to the density of water, or the relative density of the liquid. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution. To start the measurements, place the hydrometer into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at varying time frames. For sand, place it in for 45 seconds to measure that content. For silt, place it in for 1.5 hours. Then for clay, place it in for 6-24 hours. The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded [6].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows [6]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]	 Soil Science Division Staff. 2017. Soil survey manual. C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H.C. Monger (eds.). USDA Handbook 18. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]	Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture. pp. 63–65. Retrieved 30 August 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]	Lindbo, Hayes, Adewunmi (2012). Know Soil Know Life: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation. Soil Science Society of America. p. 17. ISBN 9780891189541.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]	 Foth, Henry D. (1990). Fundamentals of Soil Science 8th Edition. Canada: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons. p. 23. ISBN 0-471-52279-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]	Thien, Steven. &amp;quot;Determining Soil Texture by the &amp;quot;Feel Method&amp;quot;&amp;quot; (PDF). NDHealth.gov.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]	Bouyoucos, George. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]	Bouyoucos G. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. American Society of Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]	Wentworth grain size chart from United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006- 1195, &amp;quot;Surficial sediment character of the Louisiana offshore continental shelf region: A GIS Compilation&amp;quot; by Jeffress Williams, Matthew A. Arsenault, Brian J. Buczkowski, Jane A. Reid, James G. Flocks, Mark A. Kulp, Shea Penland, and Chris J. Jenkins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]	A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10]	Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/edu/?cid=nrcs142p2_054311&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=448</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=448"/>
		<updated>2018-03-08T04:30:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like &#039;&#039;&#039;texture by feel&#039;&#039;&#039;, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as &#039;&#039;&#039;the hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include sand, silt, and clay. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of sand, silt, and clay. Class systems most used are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems which both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Texture Classifications&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include sand, sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt, sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of sand, silt, and clay present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size (clay, silt, sand) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). Loam is more of a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of sand, silt, and a smaller amount of clay. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than loam itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of sand, silt, and clay within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay that you have in your given soil sample (see &#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say silt, and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent silt and 35 percent clay then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
The texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Particle Sizes&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wentworth Grain size.png|230px|thumb|right|The terminology for grain size naming adapted from Wentworth by the USGS]]&lt;br /&gt;
For soil, there are specific particle size ranges that determine what its components are classified as. Be it clay, silt, or sand. Clay particles are amongst the smallest having diameters less than 0.002 mm. Clay is structured in a plate like manner which also allows for its hydroplastic properties induced by the increased surface area due to its small particle size [4]. Following clay are silt particles having diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm with the USDA classification. Sand has the largest of the particle sizes with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm. Sand is divided further due its large diameter range into the categories of very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, and very coarse sand. The USDA and WRB classifications differ only slightly in the ranges of particle diameter, but both classify clay particles with the same value. The chart to the right provides a more detailed description of the soil particles and their classifications [8].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Soil particle names&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
USDA classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
WRB classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Clay&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Silt&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.063&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.05 - 0.10&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.063 - 0.125&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.10 - 0.25&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.125 - 0.20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Medium sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.25 - 0.50&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.20 - 0.63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.50 - 1.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.63 - 1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 1.00 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.25 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Methods of Determining Soil Texture&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;&#039;Texture by feel Method&#039;&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Texture_by_Feel.png|280px|thumb|right|Texture by feel flowchart]]&lt;br /&gt;
This method of determining soil texture is very qualitative. It allows for a quick hands-on approach to assess an estimate as to what soil class you may have. No equipment is required, just some knowledge of particular soil characteristics is needed. These soil characteristics are laid out within the texture by feel flowchart to the right [10]. The flowchart is relatively easy to follow and will help you determine your soil type [5]. Although you will be able to roughly determine what class your soil sample resides in, you won’t directly know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay are present.&lt;br /&gt;
To use the texture by feel flowchart simply start by taking a small portion of your soil sample, wetting it, and trying to form it into a ribbon. This can be done by forming the soil portion into a ball and then pressing it with your fingers until it has a longer flat shape to it. If the ball resists being formed into a ribbon (falling apart) then your soil sample is most likely sand. If the ball doesn’t fall apart but also doesn’t form into a ribbon, then your soil may be a loamy sand. If the soil sample does form a ribbon, then you must determine roughly what length the ribbon is able to be formed. Once this is determined follow the flowchart in the respective path of the ribbon length. Further classification is then found by feeling how gritty or smooth the soil sample feels after you excessively wet it in your palm [1]. The method of texture by feel of course takes practice, but is very useful when lab equipment is not at your disposal or if you are working in the field.&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer Method&#039;&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
The hydrometer method, developed in 1927 [7], is a very widely used way to determine soil texture through quantitative means. This method provides percentage estimates of the sand, silt, and clay within a given soil [6]. The major requirement for this method is the use of the chemical compound sodium hexametaphosphate. Sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent to separate aggregates of soil. To carry out this method, start by mixing some of the soil with hexametaphosphate in a test tube. Then place the solution into an orbital shaker overnight or shake the tube with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, remove the stone, and then place it in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution is then transferred to 1 liter graduated cylinders and then filled with water. The soil is then mixed to help separate the soil particles [6]. The particles separate based on their size and sink. The largest being sand particles with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm sink to the bottom first. Following are the medium-sized silt particles with diameters ranging from 0.002 mm to 0.05 mm. Then finally the smallest particles being clay with diameters less than 0.002 mm settle out above the silt layer. A soil hydrometer is then used to take the soil measurements. A soil hydrometer measures the density of a liquid compared to the density of water, or the relative density of the liquid. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution. To start the measurements, place the hydrometer into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at varying time frames. For sand, place it in for 45 seconds to measure that content. For silt, place it in for 1.5 hours. Then for clay, place it in for 6-24 hours. The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded [6].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows [6]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]	 Soil Science Division Staff. 2017. Soil survey manual. C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H.C. Monger (eds.). USDA Handbook 18. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]	Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture. pp. 63–65. Retrieved 30 August 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]	Lindbo, Hayes, Adewunmi (2012). Know Soil Know Life: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation. Soil Science Society of America. p. 17. ISBN 9780891189541.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]	 Foth, Henry D. (1990). Fundamentals of Soil Science 8th Edition. Canada: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons. p. 23. ISBN 0-471-52279-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]	Thien, Steven. &amp;quot;Determining Soil Texture by the &amp;quot;Feel Method&amp;quot;&amp;quot; (PDF). NDHealth.gov.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]	Bouyoucos, George. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]	Bouyoucos G. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. American Society of Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]	Wentworth grain size chart from United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006- 1195, &amp;quot;Surficial sediment character of the Louisiana offshore continental shelf region: A GIS Compilation&amp;quot; by Jeffress Williams, Matthew A. Arsenault, Brian J. Buczkowski, Jane A. Reid, James G. Flocks, Mark A. Kulp, Shea Penland, and Chris J. Jenkins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]	A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10]	Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/edu/?cid=nrcs142p2_054311&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=447</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=447"/>
		<updated>2018-03-08T04:29:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like &#039;&#039;&#039;texture by feel&#039;&#039;&#039;, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as &#039;&#039;&#039;the hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include sand, silt, and clay. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of sand, silt, and clay. Class systems most used are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems which both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Texture Classifications&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include sand, sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt, sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of sand, silt, and clay present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size (clay, silt, sand) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). Loam is more of a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of sand, silt, and a smaller amount of clay. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than loam itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of sand, silt, and clay within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay that you have in your given soil sample (see &#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say silt, and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent silt and 35 percent clay then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
The texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Particle Sizes&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wentworth Grain size.png|230px|thumb|right|The terminology for grain size naming adapted from Wentworth by the USGS]]&lt;br /&gt;
For soil, there are specific particle size ranges that determine what its components are classified as. Be it clay, silt, or sand. Clay particles are amongst the smallest having diameters less than 0.002 mm. Clay is structured in a plate like manner which also allows for its hydroplastic properties induced by the increased surface area due to its small particle size [4]. Following clay are silt particles having diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm with the USDA classification. Sand has the largest of the particle sizes with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm. Sand is divided further due its large diameter range into the categories of very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, and very coarse sand. The USDA and WRB classifications differ only slightly in the ranges of particle diameter, but both classify clay particles with the same value. The chart to the right provides a more detailed description of the soil particles and their classifications [8].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Soil particle names&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
USDA classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
WRB classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Clay&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Silt&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.063&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.05 - 0.10&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.063 - 0.125&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.10 - 0.25&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.125 - 0.20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Medium sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.25 - 0.50&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.20 - 0.63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.50 - 1.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.63 - 1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 1.00 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.25 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Methods of Determining Soil Texture&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;&#039;Texture by feel Method&#039;&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Texture_by_Feel.png|280px|thumb|right|Texture by feel flowchart]]&lt;br /&gt;
This method of determining soil texture is very qualitative. It allows for a quick hands-on approach to assess an estimate as to what soil class you may have. No equipment is required, just some knowledge of particular soil characteristics is needed. These soil characteristics are laid out within the texture by feel flowchart to the right [10]. The flowchart is relatively easy to follow and will help you determine your soil type [5]. Although you will be able to roughly determine what class your soil sample resides in, you won’t directly know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay are present.&lt;br /&gt;
To use the texture by feel flowchart simply start by taking a small portion of your soil sample, wetting it, and trying to form it into a ribbon. This can be done by forming the soil portion into a ball and then pressing it with your fingers until it has a longer flat shape to it. If the ball resists being formed into a ribbon (falling apart) then your soil sample is most likely sand. If the ball doesn’t fall apart but also doesn’t form into a ribbon, then your soil may be a loamy sand. If the soil sample does form a ribbon, then you must determine roughly what length the ribbon is able to be formed. Once this is determined follow the flowchart in the respective path of the ribbon length. Further classification is then found by feeling how gritty or smooth the soil sample feels after you excessively wet it in your palm [1]. The method of texture by feel of course takes practice, but is very useful when lab equipment is not at your disposal or if you are working in the field.&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer Method&#039;&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
The hydrometer method, developed in 1927 [7], is a very widely used way to determine soil texture through quantitative means. This method provides percentage estimates of the sand, silt, and clay within a given soil [6]. The major requirement for this method is the use of the chemical compound sodium hexametaphosphate. Sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent to separate aggregates of soil. To carry out this method, start by mixing some of the soil with hexametaphosphate in a test tube. Then place the solution into an orbital shaker overnight or shake the tube with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, remove the stone, and then place it in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution is then transferred to 1 liter graduated cylinders and then filled with water. The soil is then mixed to help separate the soil particles [6]. The particles separate based on their size and sink. The largest being sand particles with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm sink to the bottom first. Following are the medium-sized silt particles with diameters ranging from 0.002 mm to 0.05 mm. Then finally the smallest particles being clay with diameters less than 0.002 mm settle out above the silt layer. A soil hydrometer is then used to take the soil measurements. A soil hydrometer measures the density of a liquid compared to the density of water, or the relative density of the liquid. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution. To start the measurements, place the hydrometer into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at varying time frames. For sand, place it in for 45 seconds to measure that content. For silt, place it in for 1.5 hours. Then for clay, place it in for 6-24 hours. The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded [6].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows [6]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;References&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]	 Soil Science Division Staff. 2017. Soil survey manual. C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H.C. Monger (eds.). USDA Handbook 18. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]	Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture. pp. 63–65. Retrieved 30 August 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]	Lindbo, Hayes, Adewunmi (2012). Know Soil Know Life: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation. Soil Science Society of America. p. 17. ISBN 9780891189541.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]	 Foth, Henry D. (1990). Fundamentals of Soil Science 8th Edition. Canada: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons. p. 23. ISBN 0-471-52279-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]	Thien, Steven. &amp;quot;Determining Soil Texture by the &amp;quot;Feel Method&amp;quot;&amp;quot; (PDF). NDHealth.gov.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]	Bouyoucos, George. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]	Bouyoucos G. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. American Society of Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]	Wentworth grain size chart from United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006- 1195, &amp;quot;Surficial sediment character of the Louisiana offshore continental shelf region: A GIS Compilation&amp;quot; by Jeffress Williams, Matthew A. Arsenault, Brian J. Buczkowski, Jane A. Reid, James G. Flocks, Mark A. Kulp, Shea Penland, and Chris J. Jenkins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]	A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10]	Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/edu/?cid=nrcs142p2_054311&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=445</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=445"/>
		<updated>2018-03-08T04:28:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like texture by feel, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as the hydrometer method, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include sand, silt, and clay. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of sand, silt, and clay. Class systems most used are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems which both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Texture Classifications&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include sand, sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt, sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of sand, silt, and clay present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size (clay, silt, sand) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). Loam is more of a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of sand, silt, and a smaller amount of clay. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than loam itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of sand, silt, and clay within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay that you have in your given soil sample (see &#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer method&#039;&#039;&#039;). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say silt, and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent silt and 35 percent clay then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
The texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Particle Sizes&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wentworth Grain size.png|230px|thumb|right|The terminology for grain size naming adapted from Wentworth by the USGS]]&lt;br /&gt;
For soil, there are specific particle size ranges that determine what its components are classified as. Be it clay, silt, or sand. Clay particles are amongst the smallest having diameters less than 0.002 mm. Clay is structured in a plate like manner which also allows for its hydroplastic properties induced by the increased surface area due to its small particle size [4]. Following clay are silt particles having diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm with the USDA classification. Sand has the largest of the particle sizes with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm. Sand is divided further due its large diameter range into the categories of very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, and very coarse sand. The USDA and WRB classifications differ only slightly in the ranges of particle diameter, but both classify clay particles with the same value. The chart to the right provides a more detailed description of the soil particles and their classifications [8].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Soil particle names&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
USDA classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
WRB classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Clay&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Silt&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.063&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.05 - 0.10&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.063 - 0.125&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.10 - 0.25&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.125 - 0.20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Medium sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.25 - 0.50&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.20 - 0.63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.50 - 1.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.63 - 1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 1.00 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.25 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Methods of Determining Soil Texture&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;&#039;Texture by feel Method&#039;&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Texture_by_Feel.png|280px|thumb|right|Texture by feel flowchart]]&lt;br /&gt;
This method of determining soil texture is very qualitative. It allows for a quick hands-on approach to assess an estimate as to what soil class you may have. No equipment is required, just some knowledge of particular soil characteristics is needed. These soil characteristics are laid out within the texture by feel flowchart to the right [10]. The flowchart is relatively easy to follow and will help you determine your soil type [5]. Although you will be able to roughly determine what class your soil sample resides in, you won’t directly know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay are present.&lt;br /&gt;
To use the texture by feel flowchart simply start by taking a small portion of your soil sample, wetting it, and trying to form it into a ribbon. This can be done by forming the soil portion into a ball and then pressing it with your fingers until it has a longer flat shape to it. If the ball resists being formed into a ribbon (falling apart) then your soil sample is most likely sand. If the ball doesn’t fall apart but also doesn’t form into a ribbon, then your soil may be a loamy sand. If the soil sample does form a ribbon, then you must determine roughly what length the ribbon is able to be formed. Once this is determined follow the flowchart in the respective path of the ribbon length. Further classification is then found by feeling how gritty or smooth the soil sample feels after you excessively wet it in your palm [1]. The method of texture by feel of course takes practice, but is very useful when lab equipment is not at your disposal or if you are working in the field.&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer Method&#039;&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
The hydrometer method, developed in 1927 [7], is a very widely used way to determine soil texture through quantitative means. This method provides percentage estimates of the sand, silt, and clay within a given soil [6]. The major requirement for this method is the use of the chemical compound sodium hexametaphosphate. Sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent to separate aggregates of soil. To carry out this method, start by mixing some of the soil with hexametaphosphate in a test tube. Then place the solution into an orbital shaker overnight or shake the tube with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, remove the stone, and then place it in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution is then transferred to 1 liter graduated cylinders and then filled with water. The soil is then mixed to help separate the soil particles [6]. The particles separate based on their size and sink. The largest being sand particles with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm sink to the bottom first. Following are the medium-sized silt particles with diameters ranging from 0.002 mm to 0.05 mm. Then finally the smallest particles being clay with diameters less than 0.002 mm settle out above the silt layer. A soil hydrometer is then used to take the soil measurements. A soil hydrometer measures the density of a liquid compared to the density of water, or the relative density of the liquid. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution. To start the measurements, place the hydrometer into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at varying time frames. For sand, place it in for 45 seconds to measure that content. For silt, place it in for 1.5 hours. Then for clay, place it in for 6-24 hours. The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded [6].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows [6]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;References&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]	 Soil Science Division Staff. 2017. Soil survey manual. C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H.C. Monger (eds.). USDA Handbook 18. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]	Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture. pp. 63–65. Retrieved 30 August 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]	Lindbo, Hayes, Adewunmi (2012). Know Soil Know Life: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation. Soil Science Society of America. p. 17. ISBN 9780891189541.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]	 Foth, Henry D. (1990). Fundamentals of Soil Science 8th Edition. Canada: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons. p. 23. ISBN 0-471-52279-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]	Thien, Steven. &amp;quot;Determining Soil Texture by the &amp;quot;Feel Method&amp;quot;&amp;quot; (PDF). NDHealth.gov.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]	Bouyoucos, George. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]	Bouyoucos G. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. American Society of Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]	Wentworth grain size chart from United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006- 1195, &amp;quot;Surficial sediment character of the Louisiana offshore continental shelf region: A GIS Compilation&amp;quot; by Jeffress Williams, Matthew A. Arsenault, Brian J. Buczkowski, Jane A. Reid, James G. Flocks, Mark A. Kulp, Shea Penland, and Chris J. Jenkins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]	A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10]	Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/edu/?cid=nrcs142p2_054311&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=444</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=444"/>
		<updated>2018-03-08T04:27:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like texture by feel, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as the hydrometer method, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include sand, silt, and clay. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of sand, silt, and clay. Class systems most used are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems which both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Texture Classifications&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include sand, sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt, sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of sand, silt, and clay present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size (clay, silt, sand) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). Loam is more of a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of sand, silt, and a smaller amount of clay. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than loam itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of sand, silt, and clay within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay that you have in your given soil sample (see Hydrometer method). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say silt, and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent silt and 35 percent clay then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
The texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Particle Sizes&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wentworth Grain size.png|230px|thumb|right|The terminology for grain size naming adapted from Wentworth by the USGS]]&lt;br /&gt;
For soil, there are specific particle size ranges that determine what its components are classified as. Be it clay, silt, or sand. Clay particles are amongst the smallest having diameters less than 0.002 mm. Clay is structured in a plate like manner which also allows for its hydroplastic properties induced by the increased surface area due to its small particle size [4]. Following clay are silt particles having diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm with the USDA classification. Sand has the largest of the particle sizes with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm. Sand is divided further due its large diameter range into the categories of very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, and very coarse sand. The USDA and WRB classifications differ only slightly in the ranges of particle diameter, but both classify clay particles with the same value. The chart to the right provides a more detailed description of the soil particles and their classifications [8].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Soil particle names&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
USDA classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Diameter Ranges (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
WRB classification&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Clay&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
| less than 0.002&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Silt&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.002 - 0.063&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.05 - 0.10&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.063 - 0.125&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fine sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.10 - 0.25&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.125 - 0.20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Medium sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.25 - 0.50&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.20 - 0.63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 0.50 - 1.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.63 - 1.25&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very coarse sand &lt;br /&gt;
| 1.00 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.25 - 2.00&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Methods of Determining Soil Texture&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;&#039;Texture by feel Method&#039;&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Texture_by_Feel.png|280px|thumb|right|Texture by feel flowchart]]&lt;br /&gt;
This method of determining soil texture is very qualitative. It allows for a quick hands-on approach to assess an estimate as to what soil class you may have. No equipment is required, just some knowledge of particular soil characteristics is needed. These soil characteristics are laid out within the texture by feel flowchart to the right [10]. The flowchart is relatively easy to follow and will help you determine your soil type [5]. Although you will be able to roughly determine what class your soil sample resides in, you won’t directly know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay are present.&lt;br /&gt;
To use the texture by feel flowchart simply start by taking a small portion of your soil sample, wetting it, and trying to form it into a ribbon. This can be done by forming the soil portion into a ball and then pressing it with your fingers until it has a longer flat shape to it. If the ball resists being formed into a ribbon (falling apart) then your soil sample is most likely sand. If the ball doesn’t fall apart but also doesn’t form into a ribbon, then your soil may be a loamy sand. If the soil sample does form a ribbon, then you must determine roughly what length the ribbon is able to be formed. Once this is determined follow the flowchart in the respective path of the ribbon length. Further classification is then found by feeling how gritty or smooth the soil sample feels after you excessively wet it in your palm [1]. The method of texture by feel of course takes practice, but is very useful when lab equipment is not at your disposal or if you are working in the field.&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;&#039;The Hydrometer Method&#039;&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
The hydrometer method, developed in 1927 [7], is a very widely used way to determine soil texture through quantitative means. This method provides percentage estimates of the sand, silt, and clay within a given soil [6]. The major requirement for this method is the use of the chemical compound sodium hexametaphosphate. Sodium hexametaphosphate acts as a dispersing agent to separate aggregates of soil. To carry out this method, start by mixing some of the soil with hexametaphosphate in a test tube. Then place the solution into an orbital shaker overnight or shake the tube with a mixing stone for about 5 minutes, remove the stone, and then place it in a centrifuge for 15 minutes. The solution is then transferred to 1 liter graduated cylinders and then filled with water. The soil is then mixed to help separate the soil particles [6]. The particles separate based on their size and sink. The largest being sand particles with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm sink to the bottom first. Following are the medium-sized silt particles with diameters ranging from 0.002 mm to 0.05 mm. Then finally the smallest particles being clay with diameters less than 0.002 mm settle out above the silt layer. A soil hydrometer is then used to take the soil measurements. A soil hydrometer measures the density of a liquid compared to the density of water, or the relative density of the liquid. The hydrometer will need to be placed into a water filled graduated cylinder to allow for proper calibration before measurements can be taken. Record the value of the hydrometer for this “blank” solution. To start the measurements, place the hydrometer into the graduated cylinder with the soil mixture at varying time frames. For sand, place it in for 45 seconds to measure that content. For silt, place it in for 1.5 hours. Then for clay, place it in for 6-24 hours. The number visible on the hydrometer is the value to be recorded [6].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With these values the percentages of sand, silt, and clay can be calculated as follows [6]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Silt = (dried soil mass - (sand hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Clay = (clay hydrometer value – blank hydrometer value)/ (dried soil mass) * 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
%Sand = 100 – (%Clay + %Silt)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;References&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[1]	 Soil Science Division Staff. 2017. Soil survey manual. C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H.C. Monger (eds.). USDA Handbook 18. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]	Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture. pp. 63–65. Retrieved 30 August 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]	Lindbo, Hayes, Adewunmi (2012). Know Soil Know Life: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation. Soil Science Society of America. p. 17. ISBN 9780891189541.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]	 Foth, Henry D. (1990). Fundamentals of Soil Science 8th Edition. Canada: John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons. p. 23. ISBN 0-471-52279-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]	Thien, Steven. &amp;quot;Determining Soil Texture by the &amp;quot;Feel Method&amp;quot;&amp;quot; (PDF). NDHealth.gov.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]	Bouyoucos, George. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science. Vol 42 Issue 3: pp 225-230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]	Bouyoucos G. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. American Society of Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]	Wentworth grain size chart from United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006- 1195, &amp;quot;Surficial sediment character of the Louisiana offshore continental shelf region: A GIS Compilation&amp;quot; by Jeffress Williams, Matthew A. Arsenault, Brian J. Buczkowski, Jane A. Reid, James G. Flocks, Mark A. Kulp, Shea Penland, and Chris J. Jenkins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]	A soil texture diagram redrawn from the USDA webpage. Retrieved 22 October 2011, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SoilTexture_USDA.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10]	Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/edu/?cid=nrcs142p2_054311&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=443</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=443"/>
		<updated>2018-03-08T03:55:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like texture by feel, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as the hydrometer method, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include sand, silt, and clay. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of sand, silt, and clay. Class systems most used are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems which both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Texture Classifications&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png|280px|thumb|right|USDA Soil Texture Triangle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include sand, sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt, sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of sand, silt, and clay present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size (clay, silt, sand) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). Loam is more of a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of sand, silt, and a smaller amount of clay. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than loam itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of sand, silt, and clay within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay that you have in your given soil sample (see Hydrometer method). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say silt, and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent silt and 35 percent clay then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
The texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Particle Sizes&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For soil, there are specific particle size ranges that determine what its components are classified as. Be it clay, silt, or sand. Clay particles are amongst the smallest having diameters less than 0.002 mm. Clay is structured in a plate like manner which also allows for its hydroplastic properties induced by the increased surface area due to its small particle size [4]. Following clay are silt particles having diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm with the USDA classification. Sand has the largest of the particle sizes with diameters ranging from 0.05 mm to 2.00 mm. Sand is divided further due its large diameter range into the categories of very fine sand, fine sand, medium sand, coarse sand, and very coarse sand. The USDA and WRB classifications differ only slightly in the ranges of particle diameter, but both classify clay particles with the same value. The chart to the right provides a more detailed description of the soil particles and their classifications [8].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen Shot 2018-03-04 at 12.56.44 PM.png|thumb|]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:Texture_by_Feel.png&amp;diff=442</id>
		<title>File:Texture by Feel.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:Texture_by_Feel.png&amp;diff=442"/>
		<updated>2018-03-08T03:47:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png&amp;diff=441</id>
		<title>File:USDA Soil Texture.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=File:USDA_Soil_Texture.png&amp;diff=441"/>
		<updated>2018-03-08T03:46:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: USDA Soil Texture Triangle&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;USDA Soil Texture Triangle&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=440</id>
		<title>Soil Textures</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Soil_Textures&amp;diff=440"/>
		<updated>2018-03-08T03:43:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Soil texture&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classifi...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture&#039;&#039;&#039; is a parameter used in both the field and laboratory as an instrument of classification. The physical texture of the soil is used to determine such classification. This texture can be determined using qualitative methods like texture by feel, and also by using multiple quantitative methods such as the hydrometer method, the pipette method, the POM (particulate organic matter) method, or the rapid method. The hydrometer method is the most widely used of the quantitative methods. Soil texture focuses primarily on particle sizes that are less than 2 mm in diameter. Those that fit this criterion include sand, silt, and clay. Classification systems are typically based on the observed percentages of sand, silt, and clay. Class systems most used are the USDA soil taxonomy and WRB soil classification systems which both use 12 classes of texture, and also the UK-ADAS system which uses 11 classes [1]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;&#039;Texture Classifications&#039;&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US has 12 soil texture classifications that are defined by the USDA [1]. These classifications include sand, sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt, sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty clay, and clay [2]. The classifications are all determined by the fractions of sand, silt, and clay present for a particular soil sample. They are typically named for the dominating soil particle size (clay, silt, sand) or a combination of the most abundant ones (sandy clay, silty clay). Loam is more of a mixture of particle sizes composed mostly of sand, silt, and a smaller amount of clay. By weight, its mineral composition is about 40–40–20% concentration of sand-silt-clay, respectively. These proportions can vary, resulting in 5 of the previously mentioned classifications other than loam itself (clay loam, sandy loam, etc..).&lt;br /&gt;
When one wants to determine soil texture, assistance from a soil texture triangle is usually needed [2]. The image to the right is an example of a typical texture triangle [9]. Each side of the triangle represents the percentages of sand, silt, and clay within a given soil sample. The closer you get to one side of the triangle, the percentage of that soil particle size will be greater. The triangle provides aid only if you know what percentages of sand, silt, and clay that you have in your given soil sample (see Hydrometer method). Once those percentages are found the triangle can be used in a very grid like fashion to determine which of the 12 classifications your sample falls into. To use the triangle, start with one of your particle size percentages, let’s say silt, and locate where that is on its side of the triangle. Then follow the slanted line down to the left until you arrive at your percentage of clay. That point’s location will tell you what soil class you have. Essentially after you choose your starting particle size side, move parallel to your second particle size side to locate your point. For example, if you find that your soil sample is 60 percent silt and 35 percent clay then your soil is classified as silty clay loam. This method can be used in a similar manner starting from any side of the texture triangle. The triangle can also be used inversely to see what percentages of each particle size is generally present for each soil class if one is using the texture by feel method.&lt;br /&gt;
The texture is also related to chemical and physical properties of the soil. The distribution and particle sizes have an effect on the soil’s capacity for holding nutrients and water. Soils with finer textures will exhibit a higher water retention capacity, but this will decrease as particle size increases with a coarser soil texture [3].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=154</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://soil.evs.buffalo.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=154"/>
		<updated>2018-03-04T18:17:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mtbrenna: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;[[Soil Ecology]] WIKI from the University at Buffalo&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;=&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rhizo.jpg|230px|thumb|left|Soil ecology encompasses interactions between plants, soils, and the organisms that live within them.]]  [[Soil]] is a vast reservoir for a wide [[diversity]] of [[organisms]].  [[Plant roots]] explore this [[diversity]] daily.  Various other [[animals]] consume [[smaller creatures]] either intentionally or unintentionally by [[foraging]] on [[plant roots]], [[insects]], and [[microorganisms]].&lt;br /&gt;
Soil ecology is the study of how these [[soil organisms]] interact with other organisms and their environment - their influence on and response to numerous [[soil processes]] and [[properties]] form the basis for delivering [[essential ecosystem services]].  Some of the key processes in soil are [[nutrient cycling]], soil [[aggregate formation]], and [[biodiversity interactions]].&lt;br /&gt;
The [[diversity]] and abundance of [[soil life]] exceeds that of any other ecosystem.  [[Plant establishment]], competitiveness, and growth is governed largely by the [[ecology belowground]], so understanding this system is an essential component of plant sciences and [[terrestrial ecology]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=List of Possible Topics:=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Ecosystem Services]], [[Vegetable Mould]], [[Founders of Soil Concepts]], [[Pedogenesis]], [[Jenny Equation]], [[Water Behavior in Soils]], [[Soil Horizons]], [[Soil Textures]], [[Monocots]], [[Dicots]], [[Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi]], [[Rhizodeposition]], [[Soil Sampling Methods]], [[Zygomycota]], [[Glomeromycota]], [[Ascomycota]], [[Basidiomycota]], [[Humus]], [[Clay]], [[Silt]], [[Loam]], [[Soil Structures]], [[Flavonoids]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;If you still don&#039;t have access to this page, email me at krzidell and I&#039;ll hook you up.  If you already emailed me, you&#039;re ready to rock &amp;amp; roll.&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mtbrenna</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>