Difference between revisions of "Microarthropods"

From Soil Ecology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
=Extraction Methods=
 
=Extraction Methods=
  
Microarthropods are too small and numerous to be sampled as individuals so small pieces of habitat are collected and the microarthropods are then extracted from them in a laboratory. Most of the methods used for microarthropod extraction are either variations of the [[Tullgren funnel]], floatation in solvents, or filtration.
+
Microarthropods are too small and numerous to be sampled as individuals so small pieces of habitat are collected and the microarthropods are then extracted from the samples in a laboratory. Most of the methods used for microarthropod extraction are either variations of the [[Tullgren funnel]], floatation in solvents, or filtration.
  
 
[[File:tullgren.jpg|300px|thumb|left|Tullgren Funnel]]
 
[[File:tullgren.jpg|300px|thumb|left|Tullgren Funnel]]

Revision as of 10:09, 30 April 2021

Overview

Food Chain

Soil microarthropods include chelicerates (mites, spiders, and pseudoscorpions), myriapods (centipedes, millipedes, and symphylans), crustaceans (small aquatic forms often found in water features), springtails, and insects. Many groups do not have popular names; proturans and diplurans, for instance, are small soil arthropods related to insects.

Much of the microarthropod group are discovered in most types of soils. A square meter of woodland floor could contain hundreds of thousands of individuals representing thousands of different species, mainly mites and collembola. Microarthropods have a substantial impact on the decomposition process in the forest floor and are important reservoirs of biodiversity in forest ecosystems

Microarthropods form an important set of connections in food chains/webs. They feed on fungi and nematodes and are prey for macroarthropods such as spiders, beetles, ants, and centipedes.

Extraction Methods

Microarthropods are too small and numerous to be sampled as individuals so small pieces of habitat are collected and the microarthropods are then extracted from the samples in a laboratory. Most of the methods used for microarthropod extraction are either variations of the Tullgren funnel, floatation in solvents, or filtration.

Tullgren Funnel

Biodiversity

Soils, including the deepest horizons and the rhizosphere, constitute a huge reservoir of understudied biodiversity, yet our sampling techniques may be inadequate to assess the diversity and abundance of soil fauna.

Temperate forest floors with large accumulation of organic matter support high numbers of microarthropods compared to tropical forests where the organic layer is thin.

Mites outnumber collembolans but these become more abundant in some situations. Among the mites themselves, the oribatids usually dominate but the Prostigmata may develop large populations in cultivated soils with a surface crust of algae. After cultivation asigmatic mites have been seen to increase dramatically.

Soil arthropods are significant reservoirs of biodiversity. In an extensive review, reports show that at most 10% of soil microarthropod populations have been explored and 10% of species described.

Microarthropod Biodiversity

Role in Soil Ecology

While soil fauna is generally acknowledged as being important for soil aggregation, direct empirical evidence is scarce for microarthropods, including mites and collembolans, the two most abundant and diverse groups. This is surprising given that these animals can occur at high densities, and given their role in the processing of organic matter via chemical, physical and biological mechanisms

Due to their relatively small body size and total biomass, which is lower than that of fungi, bacteria and other taxa such as nematodes and protozoa, microarthropods may rather indirectly than directly affect soil structure. However, in some cases the impact of the production of assumedly large amounts of organic material in form of eggs might play an important role as direct starting points for microaggregate formation.

References

  • [1] “Berlese Funnels - Collecting Methods - Mississippi Entomological Museum Home.” Camponotus(Tanaemyrmex) Castaneus (Latreille) , mississippientomologicalmuseum.org.msstate.edu/collecting.preparation.methods/Berlesefunnel.htm#.WvLuxUxFzIV.
  • [2] “Proper Soil Sampling Techniques.” Volusia County, www.volusia.org/services/community-services/extension/agriculture/proper-soil-sampling-techniques.stml.
  • [3] Christian, E., 1978. The jump of the springtails. Naturwissenschaften 65:495-496.
  • [4] Piper, Ross (2007). Extraordinary animals: an encyclopedia of curious and unusual animals. Santa Barbara, California: Greenwood Press.
  • [5] "The incredible shrinking springtail". Science. 341 (6149): 945. 30 August 2013. doi:10.1126/science.341.6149.945-a.